On Monday, 13 January 2020 22:40:14 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:15:31 +, Mick wrote:
> > According to my emerge --info output I have sandbox, usersandbox and
> > userpriv, all set. The owner of my portage directory and all files
> > therein is root:root. Should the
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:24:51 +, (Nuno Silva) wrote:
> >> Here is the list of the bounced messages:
> >> - 189231
>
> How does one get to the message from that number?
Look at the List-Help header in any message. Following that returns a
list of commands you can send to the listserv.
--
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:37:11 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> >>> The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors. A newer fs
> >>> snapshot won't include the tree itself, but it will include the new
> >>> default fs locations for the portage directory.
> >>
> >> Not sure what you mean ... you
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:15:31 +, Mick wrote:
> According to my emerge --info output I have sandbox, usersandbox and
> userpriv, all set. The owner of my portage directory and all files
> therein is root:root. Should the ownership be portage:portage? What
> is the default?
As it happens, I
On 2020-01-13, james wrote:
> On 1/13/20 11:32 AM, gentoo-user+ow...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
>>
>> Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
>> message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
>> information.
>>
>> Here is the list of the bounced
Mick wrote:
> On Monday, 13 January 2020 19:38:33 GMT Dale wrote:
>
>> I hope I did this right. If not, tell me what to run. This is what I
>> get and I changed a few parts so I don't get hacked, or them trying to
>> at least.
>>
>>
>> root@fireball / # traceroute6 2606:4700:1::6813:894b
>>
Friends,
Back in 2015, I created several working ebuilds from tar files for
Mesos. It's been a while, so I was wondering what new
documentation/guides there are for creating ebuilds, current with EAPI-7
or even some simple examples to follow. I found lots of links, but
nothing
On 1/13/20 11:32 AM, gentoo-user+ow...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this
message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your
information.
Here is the list of the bounced messages:
- 189231
Anyone else getting these?
On Monday, 13 January 2020 19:38:33 GMT Dale wrote:
> I hope I did this right. If not, tell me what to run. This is what I
> get and I changed a few parts so I don't get hacked, or them trying to
> at least.
>
>
> root@fireball / # traceroute6 2606:4700:1::6813:894b
> traceroute to
Mick wrote:
>
> The evowise.com DNS has a valid record:
>
> $ dig @8.8.8.8 evowise.com
>
> ; <<>> DiG 9.14.8 <<>> @8.8.8.8 evowise.com
> ; (1 server found)
> ;; global options: +cmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15906
> ;; flags: qr rd ra;
On Sunday, 12 January 2020 17:50:22 GMT Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:24 AM Wols Lists
>
> wrote:
> > On 12/01/20 16:36, Mick wrote:
> > > Hmm ... I can see how Microsoft's move to cloud computing for home
>
> users can
>
> > > quickly escalate to a spiral of confusion and
On Monday, 13 January 2020 15:26:47 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday, 13 January 2020 11:00:23 GMT Dale wrote:
> > Dale wrote:
> >
> > Well, this has to be fixed or turned off completely. When I try to
> > emerge and it tries to download new packages, it is trying to use IPv6
> >
> >
mysqld goes into infinite hang when I try to boot my damn manchine.
I found how to get the thing to boot into "safe mode" then I had to unix
the unholy hell out of it just to get the MFing root partition mounted
in RW mode then I had to remember how to use rc-config to evict mysqld
from the boot
On Monday, 13 January 2020 11:00:23 GMT Dale wrote:
> Dale wrote:
> Well, this has to be fixed or turned off completely. When I try to
> emerge and it tries to download new packages, it is trying to use IPv6
> addresses which fail. It spits out this:
> >>> Downloading
>
>
On 2020-01-13 11:48, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:42:23 +0100, n952162 wrote:
The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors. A newer fs
snapshot won't include the tree itself, but it will include the new
default fs locations for the portage directory.
Not sure what
On Monday, 13 January 2020 10:42:57 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:17:06 +, Mick wrote:
> > Right, I haven't changed them on this installation either and emerge
> > FEATURES include
> >
> > '... userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync'.
> >
> > With 'userpriv' portage is
Dale wrote:
>
> If no one here has any ideas on this thing, it has to be serious. I'm
> thinking it is a upstream thing because someone on this list would know
> it if was something on my end. ;-)
>
> @Peter, link helped me understand a bit but still can't figure out my
> problem. The extra
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:42:23 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> > The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors. A newer fs
> > snapshot won't include the tree itself, but it will include the new
> > default fs locations for the portage directory.
>
>
> Not sure what you mean ... you mean
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:17:06 +, Mick wrote:
> Right, I haven't changed them on this installation either and emerge
> FEATURES include
>
> '... userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync'.
>
> With 'userpriv' portage is meant to drop privileges to the owner of the
> gentoo repo directory, but
On 2020-01-13 11:17, Mick wrote:
I just noticed that there's a new stag3, from 2020/01/12 instead of
2020/01/08 so - since this is a fresh install - I'm just going to start
from there.
The portage tree is sync'ed to the portage tree mirrors. A newer fs snapshot
won't include the tree itself,
On Monday, 13 January 2020 08:34:01 GMT n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-01-13 09:22, Mick wrote:
> >>> Same result. But I didn't delete "the whole portage tree". What does
> >>> that mean?
> >>>
> >>> rm -rf /var/db/repos?
> >>
> >> If you're using the new default location, I think it is
> >>
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday, 12 January 2020 23:32:16 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:41:43 +0100, n952162 wrote:
I had a similar issue with the .tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
continually appearing, deleting it made no difference. In the end I
deleted the whole
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:34:01 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> >> If you're using the new default location, I think it is
> >> /var/db/repos/gentoo, but someone should confirm that.
> > Yes, the new location for the portage ebuilds is:
> >
> > $ ls -la /var/db/repos/gentoo/.*
> > /var/db/repos/gentoo/.:
On 2020-01-13 09:22, Mick wrote:
Same result. But I didn't delete "the whole portage tree". What does
that mean?
rm -rf /var/db/repos?
If you're using the new default location, I think it is
/var/db/repos/gentoo, but someone should confirm that.
Yes, the new location for the portage
On 2020-01-12 16:48, james wrote:
I also install and re-install, as many of the gentoo systems get
"attacked" before I can complete a secure install, or the hackers
just read much more than I do.
I guess I'm still popular, in very negative way.
Hmmm. Is that "attacked" to be interpreted in
On Sunday, 12 January 2020 23:32:16 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 23:41:43 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> > > I had a similar issue with the .tmp-unverified-download-quarantine
> > > continually appearing, deleting it made no difference. In the end I
> > > deleted the whole portage tree
26 matches
Mail list logo
