Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On 2/9/20 7:26 PM, Michael Jones wrote: On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:55 PM james > wrote: Sure the many of the wonderful folks that visit gentoo-user would participate, just a little bit? I would be willing to help. However, if left to my own devices, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Number of open Bugzilla bugs (Was: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions)

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 7:23 PM Michael Jones wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> Bugs get closed all the time. Bugs also get opened and and linger all >> the time. I couldn't tell you the ratio, but that is the nature of >> things. >> >> If you don't report an

Re: [gentoo-user] Number of open Bugzilla bugs (Was: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions)

[top posting just because ... and clearly personal opinion] I file and deal with bugs on both bugs.gentoo.org and bugs.kde.orf, and one thing I can say with conviction is that the response to a bug varies greatly, and seems to depend on who receives it, possibly being per application, per

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:55 PM james wrote: > Sure the many of the wonderful folks that visit gentoo-user would > participate, just a little bit? I would be willing to help. However, if left to my own devices, I would just close anything with no activity for 10 years, and remind the cc list

[gentoo-user] Number of open Bugzilla bugs (Was: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions)

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:43 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > Bugs get closed all the time. Bugs also get opened and and linger all > the time. I couldn't tell you the ratio, but that is the nature of > things. > > If you don't report an issue, and nobody else is aware of it, I can > pretty much

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On 2/9/20 4:08 PM, Michael Jones wrote: On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 3:04 PM Michael Jones > wrote: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?limit=0=changed

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:04 PM Michael Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:25 PM Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Michael Jones wrote: >> > >> > Honestly I'd rather see the 30 day stabilization policy apply to LTS >> > kernels vs. being stabilized faster. Maybe

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

Michael Jones wrote: > > Again, no animosity against anyone: > > But Rich, Linux-4.19.97 was released on Jan 17th, and then > gentoo-sources-4.19.97 was released on Jan 18th, > whereas https://bugs.gentoo.org/706036 was acknowledged to be fixed by > Linux-4.19.99 on Jan 29th, and it's now Feb 9th

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 3:04 PM Michael Jones wrote: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?limit=0=changed > > > Apparently better than it used to be. The

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Question about gentoo-sources kernel release versions

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:25 PM Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:34 PM Michael Jones wrote: > > > > Here's an example of how 4.19.97 being stabilized might have exposed > users to functionality breaking bugs: https://bugs.gent was released on > Jan 18thoo.org/706036

Re: [gentoo-user] OT> Python 2x deprecated: Alternative to bleachbit ?

 Why look for an alternative? Just because the current version - that went stable just in dezember, btw - depends on py2.7? Upstream seems to be active - if you would had looked a little bit when visiting the homepage -> they just released a v3.2! And clicking that you can read - py3 update is in