I can't answer why it works in this particular case, but the generic
answer is that using a -j greater than one risks the launching of a job
that requires some output of another job not yet completed, or even
run. I suspect if you hunt through the build log, you will find the
missing
In case anyone encounters the same issue, the problem was solved by
single threaded build using MAKEOPTS="-j1". No other config changes.
Why this works but not otherwise remains a mystery. I also had the same
problem earlier today with dev-python/matplotlib-2.2.2-r1 except the
linker was
Am Dienstag, 5. Mai 2020, 18:38:26 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> On 05/05 11:22, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> > On 2020-05-05 10:38, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> > > Is Firefox/Waterfox able to interface with jackd?
> >
> > Disclaimer, I do not use Jack.
> >
> > Firefox builds, in my personal
Michael wrote:
> On Thursday, 7 May 2020 16:11:03 BST Dale wrote:
>> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Wed, 6 May 2020 22:31:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
There used to be a package that caused some serious problems with
upgrades. It was really tricky but I can't recall the name of it since
it
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 16:11:03 BST Dale wrote:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 22:31:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> There used to be a package that caused some serious problems with
> >> upgrades. It was really tricky but I can't recall the name of it since
> >> it was ages ago.
> >
Petr Vaněk wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:23:34AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> Petr Vaněk wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:15:39AM -0500, Dale wrote:
I'll dig out my magnifying glass in a bit. lol
>>> https://linuxfiend.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/gentoo10-19.jpg
>> Now that is better.
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:23:34AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Petr Vaněk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:15:39AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> >> I'll dig out my magnifying glass in a bit. lol
> > https://linuxfiend.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/gentoo10-19.jpg
>
> Now that is better. I tried clicking
Petr Vaněk wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:15:39AM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> I'll dig out my magnifying glass in a bit. lol
> https://linuxfiend.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/gentoo10-19.jpg
>
>
Now that is better. I tried clicking some stuff on the old link, even
tried ctrl + to increase the
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:15:39AM -0500, Dale wrote:
> I'll dig out my magnifying glass in a bit. lol
https://linuxfiend.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/gentoo10-19.jpg
hitachi303 wrote:
> Am 07.05.2020 um 05:39 schrieb Dale:
>> Well, it is about Gentoo and the perception someone had that Gentoo
>> is dying, which has been claimed for many, many years now.
>
>
> Personally I like this graphic about gentoo being extinct.
>
>
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 22:31:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
>
>> There used to be a package that caused some serious problems with
>> upgrades. It was really tricky but I can't recall the name of it since
>> it was ages ago.
> expat? I recall that causing some hair loss.
>
>
It's
On 5/6/20 11:39 PM, Dale wrote:
Pengcheng Xu wrote:
Sorry for possible necroposting, but I'm pretty interested what's happening in this
thread, as there seems to be detailed discussion on topics under this "Is Gentoo
dead?" clickbait subject. The whole conversation list does not even fit in
Ah, thanks for pointing this out! It appears I'm blind ...
It's rather surprising though, as sci-libs/lapack was neither upgraded
nor rebuilt. Since sci-libs/scipy wasn't upgraded either it ought to
link just fine as it had previously been built against the same version
of sci-libs/lapack. I'm
On 07.05.20 13:59, Franz Fellner wrote:
On Thu May 7 10:04:37 2020, Dan Johansson wrote:
Today when I tried to do my daily "emerge --update ... @world", portage
spitted out a lot of "Multiple package instances within a single package
slot have been pulled" messages.
So THIS would have been
Am 07.05.2020 um 05:39 schrieb Dale:
Well, it is about Gentoo and the perception someone had that Gentoo is
dying, which has been claimed for many, many years now.
Personally I like this graphic about gentoo being extinct.
https://linuxfiend.wordpress.com/2009/12/05/is-gentoo-dying/
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 14:31:41 BST Victor Ivanov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For some reason SciPy fails to compile after today's Python 3.6 ->
> Python 3.7 global update. It was the only package that failed out of all.
>
> Normally build.log (attached) is helpful enough to get me to resolve the
>
On Thu May 7 10:04:37 2020, Dan Johansson wrote:
> Today when I tried to do my daily "emerge --update ... @world", portage
> spitted out a lot of "Multiple package instances within a single package
> slot have been pulled" messages.
So THIS would have been the issue you should have given us
On Wed, 6 May 2020 22:31:54 -0500, Dale wrote:
> There used to be a package that caused some serious problems with
> upgrades. It was really tricky but I can't recall the name of it since
> it was ages ago.
expat? I recall that causing some hair loss.
--
Neil Bothwick
"Ubuntu" is an ancient
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 6:35 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 10:14 PM Caveman Al Toraboran
> toraboracave...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > are you referring to python's dependence on expat
> > and glibc?
>
> More like bash's dependence. Well, and in the case of glibc just
> about
On Thu, 7 May 2020 10:04:37 +0200, Dan Johansson wrote:
> Today when I tried to do my daily "emerge --update ... @world", portage
> spitted out a lot of "Multiple package instances within a single
> package slot have been pulled" messages.
>
> I thought this could be due to the depreciation of
Today when I tried to do my daily "emerge --update ... @world", portage
spitted out a lot of "Multiple package instances within a single package
slot have been pulled" messages.
I thought this could be due to the depreciation of python3_6 so I added
*/* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_6 python3_7
*/*
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:31 AM, Dale wrote:
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> OP, odds are the emerge failure is what triggered the problem. If it had
> completed without failure, it would likely have been a clean update. This is
> why I set up a chroot and do my updates there and use the -k option
On Thursday, 7 May 2020 04:50:41 BST Caveman Al Toraboran wrote:
> On Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:31 AM, Dale wrote:
> > Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > OP, odds are the emerge failure is what triggered the problem. If it had
> > completed without failure, it would likely have been a clean update.
On Thursday, May 7, 2020 5:43 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Are you overriding something, or were you running this right in the
> middle of an update?
emerge was updating, then some ebuild failed and i
didn't have --keep-going. then next time i tried
to sync layman it failed.
i'm now re-running
24 matches
Mail list logo
