After update I get:
* IMPORTANT: config file '/etc/mtab' needs updating.
What is this, don't remember seeing it before.
cfg-update -u
doesn't give me an option to view it.
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 15:53 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is: make oldconfig same as: make olddefconfig ?
No. olddefconfig accepts the default answer for each new configuration
item, non-interactively. oldconfig is interactive.
I can't really give you guidance with your original
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 22:10 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 4/10/23 18:53, Dale wrote:
>
>
> I've asked ChatGPT for explanation and here is what I got:
>
> Here are the differences between emerge -U and emerge -N:
>
> emerge -U: This option upgrades the specified package(s) to the
>
On 4/10/23 18:53, Dale wrote:
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U
might be better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
.
I always do
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2023-04-11, Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>> I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'. I started using
>> Gentoo back in 2003. Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
>> until I got a good
On 2023-04-11, Dale wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>
> I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'. I started using
> Gentoo back in 2003. Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
> until I got a good sane system that works as
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>
> I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U
> might be better option but it takes longer.
> Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
>
> .
>
I always do both except I use the
On 4/10/23 17:29, Jack wrote:
On 2023.04.10 18:22, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.
Is: make oldconfig same as: make olddefconfig ?
Xorg.0.log showing;
[ 673.829] (II) Loading
On 2023.04.10 18:22, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.
Is: make oldconfig same as: make olddefconfig ?
Xorg.0.log showing;
[ 673.829] (II) Loading
On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.
Is: make oldconfig same as: make olddefconfig ?
Xorg.0.log showing;
[ 673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
[ 673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org
After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.
Is: make oldconfig same as: make olddefconfig ?
Xorg.0.log showing;
[ 673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
[ 673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[ 673.829]compiled for
Some hero fixed Ruby, all good atm.
Chromium still absolutely b0rk3d. All tabs spew crash dumps to disk at
extremely high frequency, no functionality. "Error 11" not exactly same
as signal 11, but very similar.
Seamonkey works fine for e-mail and non-multimedia pages; any multimedia
->
On 4/10/23 11:11, hitachi303 wrote:
Am 10.04.23 um 18:44 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be
better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling
Am 10.04.23 um 18:44 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U
might be better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
Just out of curiosity: Is
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 10:44 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>
> I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be
> better option but it takes longer.
> Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
>
Since
Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be
better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
On 23/04/10 02:38AM, Efe İzbudak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> So since this weekend whenever I try to join a zoom call, my firefox
> crashes and so does my librewolf. I've tried using both
> firefox-bin-102.9.0 and firefox-bin-111.0.1 and also
> librewolf-bin-110.0_p2.
>
> This doesn't happen when
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 22:37, wrote:
>
> My system pulled IN two versions of webkit-gtk (slot 4 and 5)
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
>
> Running:
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
> * These packages depend on net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500:
>
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 14:37:26 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> My system pulled IN two versions of webkit-gtk (slot 4 and 5)
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
>
> Running:
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
> * These packages depend on
Hi everyone,
So since this weekend whenever I try to join a zoom call, my firefox
crashes and so does my librewolf. I've tried using both
firefox-bin-102.9.0 and firefox-bin-111.0.1 and also
librewolf-bin-110.0_p2.
This doesn't happen when I disable webgl.
I'm using dwl-0.4 and I'm on stable.
20 matches
Mail list logo
