x2goserver emerged with notice:
ERROR: preinst
Installation of a symlink is blocked by a directory:
'/etc/x2go/xinitrc.d'
This symlink will be merged with a different name:
'/etc/x2go/xinitrc.d.backup.'
What does it mean?
--
Thelma
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:46:58 +0400 (GMT+04:00), Sergey Filatov wrote:
> I don't know if vfat is safe to be mounted twice, but to solve this I'd
> go with mount bind. You can use it in /etc/fstab as well. Mount the
> /boot as usual, for /mnt/rescue/boot use /boot as a source and add
> "bind" to
On Saturday, 15 July 2023 09:42:55 BST Dale wrote:
> I tend to agree with the others. It is likely safe but bind mounting
> may be safer.
Thanks all. I'm glad I asked. :)
--
Regards,
Peter.
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> My little Celeron LAN server lives on /dev/sda5, with /boot on /dev/sda2. It's
> a UEFI system so /dev/sda2 is VFAT. Other partitions exist but they're not
> germane here.
>
> The poor wee thing takes about four hours to compile a kernel using both its
>
I don't know if vfat is safe to be mounted twice, but to solve this I'd go with
mount bind. You can use it in /etc/fstab as well. Mount the /boot as usual, for
/mnt/rescue/boot use /boot as a source and add "bind" to options section. This
is definitely safer
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 03:01:05 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Now, my question is: is it safe for me to mount the boot partition on
> /boot and /mnt/rescue/boot simultaneously? The man page hints that it
> is, and I can see them both:
>
> $ cat /proc/mounts | grep boot
> /dev/sda2 /mnt/rescue/boot
6 matches
Mail list logo
