On Friday, 9 February 2024 15:48:45 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> ... And I'm not worried about a double failure - yes it could happen,
> but ...
>
> Given that my brother's ex-employer was quite happily running a raid-6
> with maybe petabytes of data, over a double disk failure (until an
> employee
On 09/02/2024 12:57, J. Roeleveld wrote:
I don't understand it exactly, but what I think happens is when I create
the snapshot it allocates, let's say, 1GB. As I write to the master
copy, it fills up that 1GB with CoW blocks, and the original blocks are
handed over to the backup snapshot. And
On Thursday, February 8, 2024 6:44:50 PM CET Wols Lists wrote:
> On 08/02/2024 06:38, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > ZFS doesn't have this "max amount of changes", but will happily fill up
> > the
> > entire pool keeping all versions available.
> > But it was easier to add zpool monitoring for this on
On Thursday, February 8, 2024 6:36:56 PM CET Wols Lists wrote:
> On 08/02/2024 06:32, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >> After all, there's nothing stopping*you* from combining Linux and ZFS,
> >> it's just that somebody else can't do that for you, and then give you
> >> the resulting binary.
> >
> >
4 matches
Mail list logo
