On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 20:11:57 -0400
Jack wrote:
> It seems the problem is that the enviroment file in the temp dir of
> the build area is sourced when you run ebuild/emerge. (It's among
> the first output when you run ebuild.) Since that file was created
> based on the state of the ebuild when
Michael wrote:
>> Nice to know I'm not alone. I forgot to mention, it wanted to update
>> glibc first. The news item said NOT to let it do that and use the
>> --nodeps option instead. So, the command I used had that option. I've
>> since restarted it, just in case it finishes. I'll post back
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 21:28:27 GMT Dale wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > On Saturday, 23 March 2024 20:45:03 GMT Dale wrote:
> >> I saw where Peter mentioned in another thread gcc failing with no error
> >> message for him. This could be related. A solution to this may help
> >> more than just
Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 20:45:03 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I'm doing this in a chroot. This is *not* my live system. This is the
>> mount info, in case it matters.
>>
>> <<>>
>>
>>
>> I saw where Peter mentioned in another thread gcc failing with no error
>> message
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 20:45:03 GMT Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm doing this in a chroot. This is *not* my live system. This is the
> mount info, in case it matters.
>
>
> root@fireball / # mount | grep gentoo
> /proc on /backup/gentoo-build/proc type proc (rw,relatime)
> sysfs on
Howdy,
I'm doing this in a chroot. This is *not* my live system. This is the
mount info, in case it matters.
root@fireball / # mount | grep gentoo
/proc on /backup/gentoo-build/proc type proc (rw,relatime)
sysfs on /backup/gentoo-build/sys type sysfs
(rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime)
debugfs
Il 23/03/24 20:18, Michael ha scritto:
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 19:10:28 GMT you wrote:
Il 23/03/24 19:43, Michael ha scritto:
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 18:29:58 GMT ralfconn wrote:
Il 23/03/24 18:42, Michael ha scritto:
> I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work
Michael wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:33:17 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 15:08:56 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 18:29:58 GMT ralfconn wrote:
> Il 23/03/24 18:42, Michael ha scritto:
> > I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work and
>
> read the
>
> > instructions they have provided instead of winging it:
> >
> >
Il 23/03/24 18:42, Michael ha scritto:
> I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work and
read the
> instructions they have provided instead of winging it:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/23.0_update_instructions
>
I'm currently running a local merged
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:33:17 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 23 March 2024 15:08:56 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >>> Hello list,
> >>>
> >>> Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 15:08:56 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it
>>> just now on a small rescue system and it
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 15:08:56 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it
> > just now on a small rescue system and it failed on installing the
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 15:08:56 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it
> > just now on a small rescue system and it failed on installing the
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 14:59:15 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it
> just now on a small rescue system and it failed on installing the first
> binary package, complaining that my disk layout was split-usr.
>
>
Hello list,
Has anyone tried the profile upgrade that was notified today? I tried it just
now on a small rescue system and it failed on installing the first binary
package, complaining that my disk layout was split-usr.
My /var is on a separate partition, for easy of file recovery, but /usr is
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:01:44PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I looked in x11-terms and there is a few options, I think. I tried
> looking at home pages and such but none of them mention a feature like
> this but it may have it. I was wondering if anyone knows of a terminal
> emulator that
On 2024-03-23, Mickaël Bucas wrote:
> I think it's not a terminal emulator feature, but rather a shell
> feature.
>
> Some terminal programs are designed to interact with the mouse, but
> bash command line, based on readline, doesn't react to mouse clicks.
Agreed.
> I've tried Midnight
Le ven. 22 mars 2024 à 21:02, Dale a écrit :
>
> Howdy,
>
> I've been using Konsole, part of KDE, for command line stuff ever since
> I started using Linux. Linux is all I've ever used. No windoze. ;-)
> While Konsole is good enough for almost everything, there is one feature
> I wish it had.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:32:28 -0400, Jack wrote:
> > Why not add more to the ramdisk, assuming it is a tmpfs. If it needs
> > more
> > than your physical memory, it will use swap, but that won't happen
> > because you only need the extra space.
> That's actually what I did. The problem is not
20 matches
Mail list logo
