On Monday, 25 March 2024 23:14:50 GMT Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 21:48:24 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote:
> > > The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs structure -
> > > therefore make sure you select the
Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 02:58:21 GMT Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I've mentioned before that I build my packages in a chroot. I have a OS
>> copy on a separate drive. I do this because of the long compile times
>> of some packages. On occasion tho, I catch the tree in a bad
On 2024-03-25, Michael wrote:
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 21:48:24 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote:
>>
>>> The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs structure -
>>> therefore make sure you select the appropriate profile in a new
On Monday, 25 March 2024 21:48:24 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote:
> > The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs structure -
> > therefore make sure you select the appropriate profile in a new
> > installation.
> I was wondering
On 2024.03.25 17:48, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote:
> The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs
structure -
> therefore make sure you select the appropriate profile in a new
installation.
That specifically says for a new
On Monday, 25 March 2024 16:52:19 GMT Michael wrote:
> The default OpenRC installation now assumes a merged-usr fs structure -
> therefore make sure you select the appropriate profile in a new installation.
I was wondering about that. Now that we have 23.0 in place, are we meant to
change to
Am Montag, 25. März 2024, 16:30:41 CET schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Hello list,
>
> It would be good if a stage-3 tarball were available with profile 23.x built
> in. Sooner or later someone will want to build a new system with such a
> profile.
>
> Is this in the offing?
All builders now have
Le lun. 25 mars 2024, 18:44, Michael a écrit :
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 17:37:40 GMT Jacques Montier wrote:
> > Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 18:18, Michael a
> écrit :
>
> > > Therefore, you can fetch binaries from the mirrors when these have the
> > > same
> > > configuration as your locally
On Monday, 25 March 2024 17:37:40 GMT Jacques Montier wrote:
> Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 18:18, Michael a écrit :
> > Therefore, you can fetch binaries from the mirrors when these have the
> > same
> > configuration as your locally compiled software to make the whole upgrade
> > complete faster,
Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 18:18, Michael a écrit :
> On Monday, 25 March 2024 17:00:18 GMT Jacques Montier wrote:
> > Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 15:41, Peter Humphrey a
> >
> > écrit :
> > > On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:42:29 GMT Michael wrote:
> > > > I suggest it would be best to take heed of the
On Monday, 25 March 2024 17:00:18 GMT Jacques Montier wrote:
> Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 15:41, Peter Humphrey a
>
> écrit :
> > On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:42:29 GMT Michael wrote:
> > > I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work and read
> >
> > the
> >
> > > instructions
Le lun. 25 mars 2024 à 15:41, Peter Humphrey a
écrit :
> On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:42:29 GMT Michael wrote:
>
> > I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work and read
> the
> > instructions they have provided instead of winging it:
> >
> >
On Monday, 25 March 2024 15:30:41 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> It would be good if a stage-3 tarball were available with profile 23.x built
> in. Sooner or later someone will want to build a new system with such a
> profile.
>
> Is this in the offing?
It is already there; e.g.
Hello list,
It would be good if a stage-3 tarball were available with profile 23.x built
in. Sooner or later someone will want to build a new system with such a
profile.
Is this in the offing?
--
Regards,
Peter.
Hello,
I'm upgrading to the new profile, so I need to get initramfs working, but
genkernel does not create the image needed.
the output is:
* Gentoo Linux Genkernel; Version 4.3.10
* Using genkernel configuration from '/etc/genkernel.conf' ...
* Running with options:
On Monday, 25 March 2024 07:04:57 GMT Dale wrote:
> Overall, the devs did a really good job with the instructions. Just
> have to update first as it says. It works better. ;-) I just wonder
> who went through the torture of figuring out what went in what order. O_O
Indeed, they've done a
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 20:45:03 GMT Dale wrote:
--->8
> I saw where Peter mentioned in another thread gcc failing with no error
> message for him. This could be related.
Nope. I was all fingers and thumbs at the time, now all straightened out.
--
Regards,
Peter.
On Saturday, 23 March 2024 17:42:29 GMT Michael wrote:
> I suggest it would be best to take heed of the devs hard work and read the
> instructions they have provided instead of winging it:
>
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/23.0_update_instructions
Of course I was doing that,
On 23/03/2024 09:20, Neil Bothwick wrote:
tmpfs only uses the space it needs, so it would appear to the ebuild that
there is plenty of space, but it would only use and extra gig or two of
your RAM.
For me, avoiding tmpfs for big ebuilds is the least hassle, using
package.env.
I've yet to set
Il 25/03/24 08:04, Dale ha scritto:
Here is my update. I wanted to skip the system update and change
profiles first. Then do the emerge -e world which would also update
anything that was new as well. I'd only have to compile once tho.
Well, that may have caused a problem. It may work for
On Monday, 25 March 2024 07:04:57 GMT Dale wrote:
> Paul Colquhoun wrote:
> > I had the gcc compile fail, but was successful after removing the "objc"
> > use flag.
> >
> > Unfortunately, it seemd to be required by app-arch/unar during step 16,
> > rebuild world.
> >
> > I'm re-enbleing it and
On Monday, 25 March 2024 02:58:21 GMT Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've mentioned before that I build my packages in a chroot. I have a OS
> copy on a separate drive. I do this because of the long compile times
> of some packages. On occasion tho, I catch the tree in a bad place.
> Some conflict
Paul Colquhoun wrote:
> I had the gcc compile fail, but was successful after removing the "objc" use
> flag.
>
> Unfortunately, it seemd to be required by app-arch/unar during step 16,
> rebuild world.
>
> I'm re-enbleing it and will see how it all goes.
>
>
Here is my update. I wanted to
23 matches
Mail list logo
