Daniel van Ham Colchete skrev:
actually it's the 965, but the link Tim sent me shows that it's not a
chipset limitation... It's a 32bits design limitation...
Thats not true, I run 32bit Gentoo with 4 GB Memory and has no slowdown
issues I can measure with the naked eye.
Seems to me like you
Every day for around a hour the same op comes around and their is always
trouble for some reason in that short period. The channel works
perfectly the other 23 hours a day... So one has to wonder if the op is
creating the problems...
Things like kicking someone reading impaired, because they are
Bo Ørsted Andresen skrev:
On Friday 17 August 2007 10:24:55 Steen Eugen Poulsen wrote:
Could we please re-educate the #Gentoo ops and get them to have a bit
more professionalism and tact or maybe consider that not everyone has
the skills to be a good community representative.
Sooo.. have
Steen Eugen Poulsen skrev:
Every day for around a hour the same op comes around and their is always
trouble for some reason in that short period. The channel works
perfectly the other 23 hours a day... So one has to wonder if the op is
creating the problems...
Things like kicking someone
I find it hard to make sure that I deal with restarting software after I
upgrade, so since I found the debian package debian-goodies contains a
tool called checkrestart, that checks if any in memory applications is
referencing old code, I converted it to using qfile and qlist from
portage-utils.
Steen Eugen Poulsen skrev:
Code can be found at:
http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
Yeah Yeah, I know, I'm talking to myself, but I created a new version
based on upstreams debain-goodies 0.29 (old one was based on upstream 0.27).
Changelog:
0.29: Better layout of the report
Dan Johansson skrev:
Great tool, thanks!!!
Yes, best thing since sliced bread, I'm glad I found it.
BUT! It runs on four out of five boxes here. This is the error I get on the
fifth box (I'm not a phyton programmer).
Neither am I, but that wont stop me. o.O
# bin/checkrestart
Found 54
Alan McKinnon skrev:
What is this desktop search engine thingy whereof the OP speaks? I do
not know of such a thing...
Desktop search engines is this centuries wheel invention.
It's simply put a major breakthrough in how we work with our desktop.
Now the wheel didn't start out all that nice
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. skrev:
LOL
Wow, I've got my dose of hype for the next month (or more).
Sometimes it's not that hard to see the future if you have a clue, some
things is just darn good.
Fire, Wheel, Internet, The Web, Desktop Search Engines.
People all laughed at them, but they
Volker Armin Hemmann skrev:
because I have seen more than one non-booting totally f* up kernel created by
genkernel. I won't touch it ever again. If something sucked in the past, the
change is great that it sucks again in the future. Plus it doesn't really
make things easier, does it?
Ryan Sims skrev:
I think Volker's point about genkernel not making things easier is
just that it seems to be a source of confusion and complexity in this
Go read his post please, he is making things up and blaming the tool for
an idiot using it wrong.
He somehow thinks that genkernel is
Ryan Sims skrev:
Please stop using inflammatory language. Everyone. If you must have
an argument, start a new thread or take it off list. It's perfectly
fine for someone to criticize genkernel, or portage, or a hammer, or a
car, or any other tool. It's also fine if you disagree with their
Mihamina (R12y) Rakotomandimby skrev:
I have a computer with a intel 4965 wireless chipset on which I want to
run Xen and only use ebuilds.
Think I'm missing something here. Xen is in, as masked ebuilds, but it's
there.
So, I need a recent gentoo kernel (some 2.6.22 but I dont know which
Thomas de Grenier de Latour found a codeing mistake in checkrestart,
that allowed a shell user to trick checkrestart into running code.
This bug exist in debian-goodies at least as far back as 0.23 and I
inherited it into my modified version of checkrestart that I announced here.
I've
Kevin O'Gorman skrev:
My 00_default_vhost.conf:
=== start 00_default_vhost.conf ==
# If your host doesn't have a registered DNS name, enter its IP address
here.
#
#ServerName www.example.com:80 http://www.example.com:80
ServerName www.kosmanor.com:80
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman skrev:
Typical problems
Out of memory
Gentoo doesn't have any default limits, so I don't know how this rumor
came about.
You find system wide defaults in /etc/security/limits.conf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman skrev:
Great, thanks for the data. Would you mind that I contact you privately, so we
can compare notes?
It's my first time going public with an NTP server, and the input from a fellow
Gentooer will be
greatly appreciatted!
You can find details of my US located
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman skrev:
Would you mind sharing your ntp.conf too?
# /etc/ntp.conf, configuration for ntpd
# 1-3 Servers for a client. 5 servers for a pool.ntp.org server.
server x.x.x.x
server x.x.x.x
server x.x.x.x
server x.x.x.x
server x.x.x
# Default access configuration
#
Norberto Bensa skrev:
Quoting Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2007-09-18 at 18:56 -0500, Albert Hopkins wrote:
Well, I hate to sound like a ricer, but apparently it's my CFLAGS :|
CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -msse3 -ggdb -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
I have an Athlon 64 X2,
Hmmm...
Marzan, Richard non Unisys skrev:
How can I disable portage dropping or overriding my MAKEOPTS variable
setting when building certain programs?
Isn't that self defeating, when an ebuild contains enforced -j1 it's
because the program can't compile with -j2 or higher. The makefile is
written
Grant skrev:
Do you back up anything other than /etc and /home on a standard system?
In a Gentoo system nothing is really standard, so I backup everything
from / and then have a small exclude list with things like:
/dev, /proc, /sys, /exports, /var/cache/squid, /srv/BackupPC.
/var contains
Daniel Pielmeier skrev:
For the correct usage of layman take a look here [1].
[1] http://projects.gunnarwrobel.de/scripts/wiki/layman
He is using layman correctly... so this is less than helpful.
The overlay he is trying to add seems to be missing/not working in some
way, maybe the project
Dale wrote:
OK. I masked that specific version and got a older version. Will try
that and see what blows up. ;-)
I've not had time to look into this yet, but it's my understand that
from 2.6.19+ things changed in the kernel, there is now a make headers
install feature, so the package
23 matches
Mail list logo
