Re: [gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-18 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
by selecting a suitable
process scheduler and configuring your HZ to 1000

It is already done. (the Hz).
Well thanks very much for these information (you and other people on this
thread). I believe what you say but I believe too what I see with my own
eyes. If we will ever meet on a Gentoo conference or anything, I'll show my
faster X11 with negative nice level. ;) Anyway I'm running it with default
nice level (0) for some days because X11 is very unstable with -15 niceness.

2008/5/15 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Thursday 15 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  I know X runs always as root. But setting the X server process'
  priority to for example -10 makes graphical software response faster.
  It works for me!! (no matter the system hangs sometimes :).
  I think you have a fast machine, try it with a very slow computer
  (sempron processor and radeon xpress200m+fglrx).

 Please don't top post in this forum.

 Look, you are talking about running the X session as root. That doesn't
 make sense as an X session is e.g. gnome or kde which runs as the
 user. I fail to see how the X client programs have any effect on the
 the responsiveness of the server, yet this is exactly what you are
 saying. Then you talk about vulnerabilities in the client apps with an
 implication that this can somehow affect the server which runs as root.
 But that is just not true, except if a client can exploit a
 vulnerability in the server (which is to my mind not what you are
 saying).

 Finally, there is very little point in debating this topic. If Linus
 says that niceness has never had a whole lot of effect in Linux, and
 that perceived differences are entirely due to reducing the latency a
 specific app experiences, then I am going to go with the one guy that
 knows the subject and consider your experiences to be anecdotal.

 You'll probably get better results with X by selecting a suitable
 process scheduler and configuring your HZ to 1000




  2008/5/14 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
   On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Josh Cepek wrote:
 lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X
   
As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less
than 0 can only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad
idea to run your entire X session as root. X (and applications
running under X) involve a lot of code, and vulnerabilities can
exist in this code.
  
   I think you don't know how X runs.
  
   X *always* runs as root on Linux so whether you nice it to 19 or
   -19 is not relevant. It was only very very recently that someone
   got X to run as a user. Do you disagree or should I elaborate?
  
   --
   Alan McKinnon
   alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
  
   --
   gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-15 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Thanks, these are already okay.

2008/5/14 Justin Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On AD 2008 May 13 Tuesday 09:50:24 PM +0200, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
  (this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
  Debian).

 Before trying this, there are some kernel modifications you can try:

 preemptible kernel
 timer frequency - 1000 Hz


 Justin
 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-15 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
I know X runs always as root. But setting the X server process' priority to
for example -10 makes graphical software response faster. It works for me!!
(no matter the system hangs sometimes :).
I think you have a fast machine, try it with a very slow computer (sempron
processor and radeon xpress200m+fglrx).

2008/5/14 Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Josh Cepek wrote:
   lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X
 
  As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less than 0
  can only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad idea to run
  your entire X session as root. X (and applications running under X)
  involve a lot of code, and vulnerabilities can exist in this code.

 I think you don't know how X runs.

 X *always* runs as root on Linux so whether you nice it to 19 or -19 is
 not relevant. It was only very very recently that someone got X to run
 as a user. Do you disagree or should I elaborate?

 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-15 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
You really don't know what I was talking about. (sorry for my bad English).

I'm NOT running my X11 session as root (only X server), but as normal user.
Setting the nice level of X server below 0 (for example -10 or -15) made all
X11 clients (the graphical programs) response faster. Everything responses
smoother. This is not about RUNNING faster, but along with my preemptible
kernel my whole X11 session become smoother. (this is important for me
because I own a very slow computer..sh*t sempron processor..).

Not ages ago (sarge or sid in 2006 for example) Debian asked me if I want X
server to run with higher priority. (when installing x11 package with
debconf set to low). This gave me the idea.

My X11 session works good. There was 2 system hangups while playing video
with Mplayer. Maybe that was because of the very high priority. I will play
with the values, -15 proved to be dangerous.

2008/5/14 Josh Cepek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Abraham Gyorgy wrote:

 Well I did a little Google'ing, and i found a blog. There the author
 wrote:

 lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X


 As already pointed out, running process with a nice value less than 0 can
 only be done by root, and it's usually a really bad idea to run your entire
 X session as root. X (and applications running under X) involve a lot of
 code, and vulnerabilities can exist in this code. You don't want any
 vulnerabilities to be potentially exploited as the root user. Take the
 multiple X-terminal vulnerabilities reported last week by the Gentoo
 security team that could allow local attackers to hijack X11 terminals of
 other users. The moral is don't run as root unless you actually need to (and
 I'd argue that you should never need to run X sessions as root.)

  After doing this, I ran htop and it told me that my X11 was running with
 -15 niceness. I experience better responsiblity under all of X11 (kde,
 firefox, konsole, anything). For example switching from an existing Firefox
 window to (for ex.) Konsole or Xchat is much faster.
 I have to add, I own a very slow computer, so I have to do everything to
 speed up my system. It is very slow even with WinXP+official drivers.


 If the goal is to lower the priority of other tasks the computer may be
 doing at the same time, perhaps setting a higher nice value for them would
 offer similar results. In the case of compiling, portage provides an easy
 way to lower the priority with the PORTAGE_NICENESS value.

  2008/5/14 Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Andrey Falko wrote:
 On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level
for X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster,
at least when I used Debian).
 
   Nice factor for X makes graphical software run fater? I don't
  thinl so. Not at all.

 Nice factor gives X priority, so if you are compiling something and
 X's priority is high, you'll be using X as if nothing was being
 compiled.

Only if you are root. As a normal user, you can only lower the
priority of a process.


 --
 Josh





Re: [gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-14 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Well I did a little Google'ing, and i found a blog. There the author wrote:

lapitopi gyuszk # snice -15 X

After doing this, I ran htop and it told me that my X11 was running with -15
niceness. I experience better responsiblity under all of X11 (kde,
firefox, konsole, anything). For example switching from an existing Firefox
window to (for ex.) Konsole or Xchat is much faster.
I have to add, I own a very slow computer, so I have to do everything to
speed up my system. It is very slow even with WinXP+official drivers.


2008/5/14 Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Andrey Falko wrote:
  On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Tuesday 13 May 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
 Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level
 for X11? (this makes all graphical software run much faster,
 at least when I used Debian).
  
Nice factor for X makes graphical software run fater? I don't
   thinl so. Not at all.
 
  Nice factor gives X priority, so if you are compiling something and
  X's priority is high, you'll be using X as if nothing was being
  compiled.

 Only if you are root. As a normal user, you can only lower the
 priority of a process.

 Uwe

 --
 Ignorance killed the cat, sir, curiosity was framed!
 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




[gentoo-user] Nice level for X11

2008-05-13 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Hello guys, in which configuration file can I set a nice level for X11?
(this makes all graphical software run much faster, at least when I used
Debian).

Thanks in advance


Re: [gentoo-user] Best anti-virus

2008-05-09 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
If you want open source antivirus, you can only use ClamAV.
Anyway there are a number of free or commercial antivirus solutions for
Linux. (I don't know if any of these supports Thunderbird).

http://www.linux.com/articles/22899

This is a good article about antivirus solutions. You can use ClamAV along
with Sylpheed(Claws) because it has integration for it.

Bye, Gyuszk

2008/5/9 Tony Caudel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I am currently using the clamv anti-virus program.  I was wondering if
 there is a better one for Gentoo, especially one that integrates well with
 Thunderbird.  That has been my one disappointment with clamav.  Not
 necessarily clamav's fault since T/B maintains its emails in one long file.

 Tony

 --
 Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
  -- Benjamin Franklin


Re: [gentoo-user] [off-topic] Hello all!

2008-05-04 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Ask a question and you'll be answered. But first look at
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Main_Page ! It has tons of tips! ;)

2008/5/4, Akselii [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hello all, this is my first time trying these lists, and i found them
 quite handy already.
 Any tips or tricks for me?

 Sorry for off-topic!
 --
 Akseli Ollikainen

 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] march=k8 for AthlonX2?

2008-05-03 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Omg, we really can use march=native ?? That would be great if true.
(sorry for my bad english :)

2008/5/3, Neil Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Mark Knecht wrote:

  Would I be making a reasonably good setting using this in make.conf?
 
  CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
  CXXFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
 
 

 That's what I would be using on my single, dual and quad cores if I
 weren't using -march=native. ;)


 Be lucky,

 Neil


 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.


 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] march=k8 for AthlonX2?

2008-05-03 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Thanks. Unfortunately I'm not using 4.2, but 4.1
http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-devel/gcc
4.2 is in testing for amd64.

2008/5/3, Neil Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Abraham Gyorgy wrote:

  Omg, we really can use march=native ?? That would be great if true.
 

 Yes, as long as you are using a recent version of gcc which has support
 for it. I think it came in with gcc 4.2.

  (sorry for my bad english :)
 

 Your English seems fine to me - better than some native English speakers I
 know. ;)


 Be lucky,

 Neil


 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
 believed to be clean.


 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] SMB protocol for Krusader

2008-05-02 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Well thanks. :)

lapitopi gyuszk # emerge -pv kdebase

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N] sys-apps/xinetd-2.3.14  USE=perl tcpd 295 kB
[ebuild  N] net-fs/samba-3.0.28  USE=acl cups ipv6 pam python readline
-ads -async -automount -caps -doc -examples -fam -ldap -quotas (-selinux)
-swat -syslog -winbind LINGUAS=-ja -pl 17,735 kB
[ebuild   R   ] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6  USE=cups pam samba* xscreensaver
-arts -branding -debug -hal -ieee1394 -java -joystick -kdeenablefinal
-kdehiddenvisibility -ldap -lm_sensors -logitech-mouse -openexr -opengl
-xcomposite -xinerama 23,671 kB

Total: 3 packages (2 new, 1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 41,700 kB
lapitopi gyuszk #

I think it's going to work.

2008/5/2, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Freitag, 2. Mai 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  Hello Gentoo users,
 
  I'm trying to enable smb:// support for Krusader. Searching the net I
 got a
  solution: I have to emerge kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves. (on Ubuntu I had
 to
  install a very similarly named package to do this).
 
  But unfortunately doing this isnt a good idea, because:
 
  lapitopi gyuszk # emerge -pv kdebase-kioslaves
 
  These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
 
  Calculating dependencies... done!
  [ebuild  N] kde-base/kdialog-3.5.8  USE=-arts -debug
 -kdeenablefinal
  -kdehiddenvisibility -xinerama 23,633 kB
  [ebuild  N] kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5.8  USE=-arts -debug -hal
  -kdeenablefinal -kdehiddenvisibility -ldap -openexr -samba -xinerama 20
 kB
  [blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5* (is blocking
  kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6)
  [blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.5* (is blocking
  kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5.8, kde-base/kdialog-3.5.8)
  [blocks B ] =kde-base/kdialog-3.5* (is blocking
  kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6)
 
  Total: 2 packages (2 new, 3 blocks), Size of downloads: 23,653 kB
 
 
  Maybe kdebase has a use flag for kioslaves...?
 
  lapitopi gyuszk # emerge -pv kdebase
 
  These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
 
  Calculating dependencies... done!
  [ebuild   R   ] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6  USE=cups pam xscreensaver
 -arts
  -branding -debug -hal -ieee1394 -java -joystick -kdeenablefinal
  -kdehiddenvisibility -ldap -lm_sensors -logitech-mouse -openexr -opengl
  -samba -xcomposite -xinerama 23,671 kB
 
 
  No. :(
 
  Information: I'm running Gentoo amd64, everything up-to-date. Installed
  monolythic kde (emerge kde).
  Can anybody help? Thanks a lot.


 there is no flag, because kio-slaves are an integral part of KDE and
 always
 installed with kdebase. So you don't need to install anything.
 BUT you need to re-emerge kdebase with the samba useflag. lmsensors,
 opengl,
 hal, java, kdehiddenvisibility, xcomposity would be good ideas too.



 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




[gentoo-user] SMB protocol for Krusader

2008-05-01 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Hello Gentoo users,

I'm trying to enable smb:// support for Krusader. Searching the net I got a
solution: I have to emerge kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves. (on Ubuntu I had to
install a very similarly named package to do this).

But unfortunately doing this isnt a good idea, because:

lapitopi gyuszk # emerge -pv kdebase-kioslaves

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kdialog-3.5.8  USE=-arts -debug -kdeenablefinal
-kdehiddenvisibility -xinerama 23,633 kB
[ebuild  N] kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5.8  USE=-arts -debug -hal
-kdeenablefinal -kdehiddenvisibility -ldap -openexr -samba -xinerama 20 kB
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5* (is blocking
kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6)
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdebase-3.5* (is blocking
kde-base/kdebase-kioslaves-3.5.8, kde-base/kdialog-3.5.8)
[blocks B ] =kde-base/kdialog-3.5* (is blocking
kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6)

Total: 2 packages (2 new, 3 blocks), Size of downloads: 23,653 kB


Maybe kdebase has a use flag for kioslaves...?

lapitopi gyuszk # emerge -pv kdebase

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild   R   ] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.8-r6  USE=cups pam xscreensaver -arts
-branding -debug -hal -ieee1394 -java -joystick -kdeenablefinal
-kdehiddenvisibility -ldap -lm_sensors -logitech-mouse -openexr -opengl
-samba -xcomposite -xinerama 23,671 kB


No. :(

Information: I'm running Gentoo amd64, everything up-to-date. Installed
monolythic kde (emerge kde).
Can anybody help? Thanks a lot.


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: init 1, root device is busy :(

2008-04-20 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Dirk Heinrichs wrote:

Am Samstag, den 19.04.2008, 21:53 +0200 schrieb Abraham Gyorgy:
  
Now all my partitions are set to 
never fsck at boot time. :)



Never do this unless you're using xfs.

Bye...

Dirk
  

Why? never fsck at boot time -

/dev/hda1   /boot   ext3noauto,noatime  0 0
/dev/hda2   /   ext3noatime 0 0
/dev/hda3   /home   ext3noatime 0 0


Now it is set to:

/dev/hda1   /boot   ext3noauto,noatime  0 2
/dev/hda2   /   ext3noatime 0 1
/dev/hda3   /home   ext3noatime 0 2

(I've read in fstab manpage that root device should be 1, other 
partition should be 2.

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: init 1, root device is busy :(

2008-04-19 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Francesco Talamona wrote:

On Saturday 19 April 2008, Gyuszk wrote:
  

I can unmount my /boot and /home partitions but I just can't
remount my root device to be readonly. (Linux says it is busy.) What
should I do with this?

1.) Should I edit my Grub menu.lst to make a new entry with single
ro kernel parameteres?
2.) Of course I can fsck from (for example) a LiveCD (like Gentoo
minimal cd), but at the present I don't have any of these.
3.) Other solution?



Of course: it's in use :-)

Two options:

1) force partition check with the following command (seen recently in 
this list)

shutdown -Fr

2) create the file /forcefsck
touch /forcefsck
then reboot, during shutdown you'll see A full fsck will be forced on 
next startup and then Checking root filesystem (full fsck forced)


See the scripts /etc/init.d/halt.sh, /etc/init.d/checkfs 
and /etc/init.d/checkroot to see all the nuts and bolts


Ciao
Francesco

  

Thanks a lot! I'll give a deep look at the mentioned files.
Anyway I think I'll set my fstab. Now all my partitions are set to 
never fsck at boot time. :)

--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] init 1, root device is busy :(

2008-04-19 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:

Hello

On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:18:04PM +0200, Gyuszk wrote:
  

3.) Other solution?



man shutdown:

-F Force fsck on reboot.

(I know, this one is not really intuitive)

  

Thanks!
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: init 1, root device is busy :(

2008-04-19 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Francesco Talamona wrote:

On Saturday 19 April 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  

Thanks a lot! I'll give a deep look at the mentioned files.
Anyway I think I'll set my fstab. Now all my partitions are set to
never fsck at boot time. :)



Supposing it's a ext2/3 partition you may also want to use tune2fs to 
set the check *frequency*.


Other filesystems have specialized tools to do it.

Ciao
Francesco

  
Yes, I know that (read in the manpage). Once I did mess up totally my 
filesystem (I think I typed wrong arguments accidentally) with tune2fs. :)

Since then I really fear of that command.

Okay, so after setting a correct fstab (and the shutdown -Fr now) _all_ 
my partitions were checked during boot (no more need to worry about the 
init 1 thing.). My root partition were fixed (reboot was needed). I'll 
set an fsck frequency and set counters to zero. Thanks all the help, 
people on this mailing list are very-very helpful. Thanks everyone who 
wrote to this thread!


--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

2008-04-13 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
2008/4/12, Eric Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1


 Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
 
  2008/4/11, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
  On Freitag, 11. April 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  I use revdep-rebuild everytime I upgrade my system. (emerge --sync 
  emerge -uD world  revdep-rebuild  etc-update).
  I think revdep-rebuild know what libs are broken.
 
  revdep rebuild does not see all brokeness.
 
  ldd the games and rebuilt all libs that are loaded.
 
  Thanks. Could you give me some instructions (or howto links anything)
 on how
  to ldd an installed package? Thanks.


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ldd /bin/bash
 linux-gate.so.1 =  (0xe000)
 libncurses.so.5 = /lib/libncurses.so.5 (0xb7f66000)
 libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb7f62000)
 libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e32000)
 /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb7fbb000)
 Also, please don't top-post.  It makes it really hard to keep up with
 the conversation.  Thanks!

 - --
 Eric Martin
 Key fingerprint = D1C4 086E DBB5 C18E 6FDA  B215 6A25 7174 A941 3B9F
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iD8DBQFIAGu6dheOldgSlQgRAhCuAKCxeyy3S2P9tJHPrKbBBcEHn5sChACgjIEB
 aADBXdKvqpuOWraPhSi8Mew=
 =sVhi
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-

 --

 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list


Okay. Thanks! :)


Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

2008-04-12 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Thanks. Could you give me some instructions (or howto links anything) on how
to ldd an installed package? Thanks.

2008/4/11, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Freitag, 11. April 2008, Abraham Gyorgy wrote:
  I use revdep-rebuild everytime I upgrade my system. (emerge --sync 
  emerge -uD world  revdep-rebuild  etc-update).
  I think revdep-rebuild know what libs are broken.


 revdep rebuild does not see all brokeness.

 ldd the games and rebuilt all libs that are loaded.

 --

 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

2008-04-11 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
I use revdep-rebuild everytime I upgrade my system. (emerge --sync  emerge
-uD world  revdep-rebuild  etc-update).
I think revdep-rebuild know what libs are broken.

2008/4/10, Volker Armin Hemmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Montag, 7. April 2008, Gyuszk wrote:

  Maybe I have to set some USE flags? Thanks in advance!

 more likely that some lib used by the games needs to rebuilt.

 --

 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo AMD64, games freeze!

2008-04-10 Thread Abraham Gyorgy
Okay thanks guys, I'll write this post on the gentoo-amd64 list.

2008/4/9, Mateusz A. Mierzwin'ski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Mark Knecht pisze:

  On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Marzan, Richard non Unisys
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
   -Original Message-
   
   
 From: Mark Knecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
 
 
 
 Those of us on the Gentoo-amd64 list welcome you to come join us.

 - Mark
 --
  
  
  
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
   
   
Doesn't it seems strange that most users posts on the gentoo-user ml,
regardless of what other ml are available for their topic? I must say
that I am guilty of that too. Doesn't anyone post to gentoo
subcategorized ml anymore?
  
  
  
 
  Well, I certainly post on the gentoo-amd64 list when my questions are
  specific to my 64-bit machines. things like how to make Flash, java,
  plugins, etc., work better on that platform are, to me, very
  appropriate to that list.
 
  I post here for more general conversations.
 
  - Mark
 
 
 I think that this types of info should be mailed to gentoo-user. But when
 we post about incompatibility (something don't work as this should) then
 better to post to gentoo-amd64 list.
 --
 gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




Re: [gentoo-user] Replacing eth0 with wlan0

2007-03-08 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Steve L. írta:



On 3/7/07, *Abraham Gyorgy* [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hello again :)

I've switched my networking from wired eth0 to wlan0. I'm using
ndiswrapper with Win32 driver and an USB WiFi adapter. Everything is
fine, but...
When I set up my Gentoo installation, I've added net.eth0 to default
runlevel (it provices the networking in the init system). My ethernet
driver (forcedeth nvidia nforce2 chip) is compiled in, using DHCP.
All I
had to do is to add net.eth0.
Now when my system boots it is waiting 1-2 mins for DHCP, then goes
forward, but (in the init system) there is no networking, so Samba and
other stuff doesnt work.
I want to replace this thing,

1) ndiswrapper module should go to /etc/modules.autoload folder
2) then wlan0 device appears, I want to do iwlist wlan0 scan, then
DHCP for wlan0
3) all this stuff should go nice to init system, eth0 should be
removed,
so wlan0 should provide the init system with net.

Now I wait for eth0 dhcp'ing, then modprobe, iwlist, and dhcpcd by
hand,
but it is time consuming and not so nice.
What to do exactly guys?

Thanks a lot!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailto:gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list


You could tie the net dependent services to the net.lo line, and 
afterwords bring up either net.eth0 or net.wlan0 manually (Remove them 
from the rc default).  It's not pretty but it could work.  The other 
consideration is to build your profile primairily for which net 
connection you intend to use the most (Wired/Wireless)

Thanks for answers guys, I'll return, hope I'll succeed.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Replacing eth0 with wlan0

2007-03-07 Thread Abraham Gyorgy

Hello again :)

I've switched my networking from wired eth0 to wlan0. I'm using 
ndiswrapper with Win32 driver and an USB WiFi adapter. Everything is 
fine, but...
When I set up my Gentoo installation, I've added net.eth0 to default 
runlevel (it provices the networking in the init system). My ethernet 
driver (forcedeth nvidia nforce2 chip) is compiled in, using DHCP. All I 
had to do is to add net.eth0.
Now when my system boots it is waiting 1-2 mins for DHCP, then goes 
forward, but (in the init system) there is no networking, so Samba and 
other stuff doesnt work.

I want to replace this thing,

1) ndiswrapper module should go to /etc/modules.autoload folder
2) then wlan0 device appears, I want to do iwlist wlan0 scan, then 
DHCP for wlan0
3) all this stuff should go nice to init system, eth0 should be removed, 
so wlan0 should provide the init system with net.


Now I wait for eth0 dhcp'ing, then modprobe, iwlist, and dhcpcd by hand, 
but it is time consuming and not so nice.

What to do exactly guys?

Thanks a lot!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list