On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 01:48:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> And it's very difficult to downgrade it due to that hidden barf check
> in the ebuild. I have yet to find a supported, documented way to back
> out of glibc screw-ups; my way is to keep binpkgs of @system and use
> those
21:26:38 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
>
> After that, I unpacked stage 1. The boostrap worked fine until
> during compilation of glibc a command ".././scripts/mkinstalldirs"
> stoped with (yes!): "FATAL: kernel too old".
>
> An strace of the chroot command ends with t
t; > older, working version in seconds rather than minutes or hours is a
> > > definite benefit.
> >
> > And in addition to that they only require a working tar and bash (which
> > could be run from a livecd) to roll back.
>
> Oh yes, I've been there when a b
="POSIX"
LC_ADDRESS="POSIX"
LC_TELEPHONE="POSIX"
LC_MEASUREMENT="POSIX"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="POSIX"
LC_ALL=
im portuguese (pt_PT) but usualy use en_US. i recompiled glibc with
userlocales, now xterm is messed up (no coloring and stuff i have to
manually
t at all sure why; instead
>>>it has pulled in the linuxthreads package. Can anybody help out here?
>>>
>>>
>>You probably have both. If you look at the output of the glibc build you'll
>>see a note indicating that both NPTL and linuxthreads are built
On 16 May 2006 12:44:37 -0500, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So it appears then that something is wrong with this update process.
emerge -v -uDp gcc doesn't want to update the current gcc which is
3.3.6 yet the glibc it wants to install requires a newer
gcc bad.
No,
Sorry for capturing the thread. :)
What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4.
Does the same concerning "emerge -e world" apply here
(e.g. it is recommended to do it) ?
Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4 is
enough ?
BR
Thomas
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 1
d ISO8895-15 although I still don't know where the 02locale
> file should have been set from. I manually created it.
This is not connected to your profile or gcc upgrade. It's your glibc upgrade.
glibc-2.4.x is stricter when it comes to syntax than glibc-2.3.x. Please show
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 09:49:32 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a need for either nptl or nptlonly in our USE flags now that we have
> moved over to glibc-2.4 (assuming that we do not want linuxthreads anymore)?
> I currently have nptlonly in my make.conf an
On 09/12 04:50, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 05:43:59 CEST schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a problem this morning:
> > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> > >>> Running pre-merge checks for sys-libs/glib
On 02/03/2018 06:54:06 AM, Dale wrote:
While on this topic, I have a question about glibc. I have it set in
make.conf to save the binary packages. Generally I use it when I need
to go back shortly after a upgrade, usually Firefox or something.
However, this package is different since going
nvincing the third part library
> authors to make those changes would be best because it would benefit
> all of their consumers.
The easy option is to use (unstable) gcc 7.3.0-r6. It biulds with
glibc-2.28, and it will cleanly compile the library. [This is what
I'm doing.]
What I was aski
On 07/16/2014 09:32:31 AM, Dale wrote:
I tried this. I unpacked the stage3 tarball just like I would for a
new
install, in /mnt/gentoo of course. I set it up just enough to where I
could try and emerge glibc and just see if it would complete or if it
would fail. It failed. It seems to me
my
laptop and I fell into the same error as you, Dale. Well, I haven't checked
all the details but it seems similar.
The odd thing is that I used a not-very-recent stage-3 that I'd already used
to install from - without problems that time. So I emerged glib and glibc in
the new, raw
y been a couple of weeks since I updated this system, so I don't
> know
> why it fails with a glibc update, while other systems have no problem:
[...]
> * The specific snippet of code:
> * [[ $STAT -eq 0 ]] || die "CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION must be
> enabled in
When I installed Gentoo on my desktop PC, I could've sworn that I
selected...
[15] default/linux/amd64/17.1/no-multilib (stable)
...as the profile. ***THINGS HAVE BEEN WORKING FINE FOR A COUPLE OF
YEARS.***
While updating tonight, glibc dies with a build error...
.[31;01m*.[0m
Hi,
OK, so it's too late again but my current build reminded me to ask
about emerging glibc and the section where it does all these different
locales. Do I need this stuff? If not how would I tell the system to
do only my Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk locale?
Thanks,
Mark
--
gentoo
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
but there is enough stuff out there, that does not work with ntpl.
So recommending ntplonly is irresponsible.
No problems here. I'd expect people to do their own research before making the
switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if
>
> However, did you notice that the parent poster mentioned glib and you have
> attempted to downgrade glibc?
>
>
>
My fault missed the c.
@Jeff
Please provide a emerge --info so that we can comment on it. Perhaps
this will protect you from some more headache
On Donnerstag, 8. November 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This morning, I upgraded to glibc 2.7 from whatever used to be current
> in ~x86 before that (2.6.).
>
> Do you guys do a "emerge -e system", ie. recompile everything, after such
> an upgrade?
On 1 Oct 2008, at 20:44, Alan McKinnon wrote:
...
So I tried more and once xpcom problem is resolved but UTF-16.so (it
belongs glibc package) is.
I have to re-emerge glibc?
You are throwing faeces at the wall and hoping that it sticks ...
Hey! It's ART, man!
Stroller.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> VO: [gl] 320x240 => 320x240 Planar YV12
> *** glibc detected *** mplayer: malloc(): memory corruption:
> 0x01957a60 ***
try with "-vo xv" to see if perhaps it is gl-related... Sometimes I
have videos cra
> can you give me the mirrorsit where to download the latest glibc and
> xcompmgr
> thx
I just commented out the GENTOO_MIRRORS entry.
- Grant
> > > > When I try to emerge the latest glibc or xcompmgr I get a 404. Here's
> > >
> > > Change your G
Rodrigo Lazo wrote:
!!! ERROR: sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 failed.
!!! Function toolchain-glibc_src_test, Line 246, Exitcode 2
Search bugzilla, and file a bug if it doesn't exist already.
As a workaround, you could remove "maketest" from FEATURES.
Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPA
> I masked =sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r4.
>
> And now I remember why I did this: It gave a compilation error:
> (As some other packages) it has problems with my texinfo installation
> as it seems.
>
bug number?
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux develo
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> - sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
This is the current stable version of glibc, which would satisfy the
ebuild. You have it masked manually, it would seem.
Did you leave yourself a comment as to why it was masked?
; a new
>>>>> install, in /mnt/gentoo of course. I set it up just enough to
>> where I
>>>>> could try and emerge glibc and just see if it would complete or if
>> it
>>>>> would fail. It failed. It seems to me that while it may be
>> com
ver, I am still encountering an error at the point where
I am at section 7.1 Building the Toolkit: GCC 3.3.5 in the document I
referenced above. I have determined that the error occurs quite a ways
into the glibc portion of the `emerge gcc-config glibc binutils gcc' by
running each co
side the `~' daredevil stage and is not
> >> masked, it should `just work' [tm].
> >>
> >>
> >
> > When I read the bug rightfully, procmail did not build with glibc
> > 2.10.1, which is *not* stable yet, especially because of a lot packages
&g
yep i used localepurge yesterday and then rebuilt glibc. do i need to
replace 'LC_...="POSIX" with en_us, etc? i prefer the english
translations but i would like also portuguese suport.
thanks,
vida root # locale -a
C
POSIX
de_DE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
en_HK
en_PH
en_US
en_US.utf8
es
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:53:11 +0100
Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> /etc/locales.build
>
> which says
>
> # This file names the list of locales to be built when glibc is installed.
> # The format is /, where is a locale from the
> # /usr/sha
I think --gen-suppressions may be a too "complicated" solution. valgrind
shouldn't find *any* warnings from the libraries of my system at all. either
valgrind is doing something wrong or there's really some errors on glibc. in
every other system I try, valgrind runs fine.
I r
> Back on topic now :-) Apparently upstream is aware of this silly
> behaviour/bug, maybe I should wait a bit and see if they provide a knob to go
> back to the old behaviour
This sounds like a reasonable plan. glibc downgrades aren't supported
not only because they are a pain in
Alexander Veit wrote:
Hi,
When I try to emerge -u world, the only package that's going to be updated
is glibc. However the build fails with the following error:
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
-j3 causes many build problems for many packages that build internal
libraries and then try
On 04/26/2012 05:09:58 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
I've had two segfaults I'd never seen before. One in sudo and one in
rdesktop. Updates later when I get things better tracked down.
I am at glibc-2.15-r1 on AMD64 with no problems so far,
Helmut.
Carlos Sura schrieb am 14.04.2011 21:47:
> Yes, I'm using ~amd64 version of glib, I tried to downgrade glib, but it
> show me this error: *downgrading glibc is not supported and a sure way to
> destruction.*
sys-libs/glibc != dev-libs/glib
It should be safe to downgrade
can you give me the mirrorsit where to download the latest glibc and xcompmgr
thx2005/10/10, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > When I try to emerge the latest glibc or xcompmgr I get a 404. Here's>> Change your GENTOO_MIRRORS in /etc/make.confThat was it, thanks!- Grant--
On 5/11/06, Jerry McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm going one step further with gcc 4.1.0. After I emerged gcc and glibc... I
did an "emerge -e system" twice and am now following up with two "emerge -e
world" commands...
Wow, you like to waste a lot of CPU
Hi,
I am running squid on amd64. I tried 3.2.6 and 3.2.9 both repeatedly die
with glibc-errors in cache.log. Anybody else experiencing something similar?
Regards,
Konstantin
--
Dipl-Inf. Konstantin Agouros aka Elwood Blues. Internet: elw...@agouros.de
Altersheimerstr. 1, 81545 Muenchen
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162:
> My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I
> find out where the problem is, actually?
>
> Output attached.
Did you have a look at
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news-items/2021-10-18-libxcry
* Nicolai Beuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unmerging the old glibc ends up in an error about commands are
> no longer found. Back at the prompt I can´t fire any command.
> Nothing was found. Even shutdown failed.
When you're trying to run some binary (which definit
;> As the list knows, I been having random lock ups on my
> >>>> system.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm in the process of one last emerge -e world but I'm
> >>>> not
> >>>>
> >>>> holding my breath i
On Saturday 02 December 2006 19:22, Richard Fish wrote:
> On 12/2/06, Helmut Jarausch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The next step which I'm afraid of is upgrading
> > to glibc-2.5
> >
> > Having destroyed (the system) of my machine some years
> > ago by
thanks for the tips
i did remerge tk tcl and python several times as well as the
complaining packages.. no luck
or was it only tcl? i'll check that today maybe i forgot to recompile tk
about the glibc yes i'm using ~x86 i'll try revdep-rebuild today
though i don't think it
to select that since the
multilib use flag is missing.
# equery hasuse multilib
[ Searching for USE flag multilib in all categories among: ]
* installed packages
[I--] [ ] sys-libs/libstdc++-v3-3.3.4 (5)
[I--] [ -] sys-libs/glibc-2.3.5-r2 (2.2)
[I--] [ -] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4-r1 (3.4)
# emerge -
Hello!
Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then,
I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because
the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8:
[10:17:42 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] $ locale -a
locale: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default l
Dale wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> On 07/16/2014 09:32:31 AM, Dale wrote:
>>> I tried this. I unpacked the stage3 tarball just like I would for a new
>>> install, in /mnt/gentoo of course. I set it up just enough to where I
>>> could try and emerge glibc
On 4/3/22 10:27, Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2022, 10:23:25 CEST schrieb n952162:
My emerge fails due to a collision with xorg-server and glibc. How can I
find out where the problem is, actually?
Output attached.
Did you have a look at
https://www.gentoo.org/support/news
Alle 05:28, domenica 12 giugno 2005, Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos
Sales ha scritto:
> Did you recently recompiled glibc? 2 of the files on the log are part
> of glibc. Maybe it is that reason. If not, downgrading it may help.
I tried to reemerge ut2004...And now it works! Thanks a lot!
I have emerged glibc with "debug -glibc-omitfp" and restarted the
system. But when I execute "valgrind /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox" I
only see things like this:
Invalid read of size 4
at 0x4018620: (within /lib/ld-2.9.so)
No filename:linenumber here. What does it take
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael P. Soulier
wrote:
> On 18/03/09 Alan McKinnon said:
>
>> Seriously, you are running a stable arch. All known issues should be resolved
>> by the time glibc hits stable. You can always askhere, or look at b.g.o for
>> any outstand
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
=
System uname:
[EMAIL
I wish to build a binary package of glibc-2.14.1-r3. I don't want to
actually install it on my system. Just build a tbz2 for it to use on
another system. Is there a way to do that? Portage aborts when
emerging an older glibc and won't let you proceed, so I can't just
inst
Am 14.10.2011 00:22, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>
> Anyone hitting the same issue?
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6824432.html?sid=ff31450ec4a661979b3545e662bdfbb1
>
> AFAI understand glibc-2.13-r4 (as in ~amd64 right now) is too new
> for the vmware-binary?
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 15:16:20 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> don't use prelink - but postfix still Works For Me(tm)
That's odd, it broke local deliveries for me - and others. Fortunately,
nothing was lost, it just stayed in the queue while I recompiled glibc.
--
Neil B
On 02/07/2011 02:34:52 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Don't install glibc-2.13 if you either use prelinking or run postfix.
> After testing it on my netbook, which uses neither, I installed it on
> my
> desktop and home server and broke both.
Has anybody tried this
http://psyki
On 11/6/06, Sergio Polini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect that there is a glibc "problem":
http://www.vmware.com/community/message.jspa?messageID=26228
Look at the posts by... Richard Fish ;-)
Nah, not the same problem. In my case it was a gentoo-specific glibc
patch tha
Hi, I've been looking and I haven't found a way to
record the emerge's messages like
* Warning! Gentoo's GLIBC with NPTL enabled now
behaves like the
* glibc from almost every other distribution out
there
There's a log or
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 03:57, Jerry McBride wrote:
> Anyone here running a ~x86 box and have the latest glibc and a 4.0.3 gcc
> running on it?
any good reasons not to use gcc 4.1?
gcc 4.0.X has a lot of annoying bugs - and several of them are fixed in
4.1 ...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org m
Has anybody tried updating glibc to the latest stable 2.4-r3, but
without also updating gcc to 4.1.1? Any problems?
>From the ebuild, >=sys-devel/gcc-3.4.4 should be supported.
I'd like to do the updates separately if possible.
Thanks.
-- Remy
Remove underscore and suffix in reply
point
I untared a file extracted from the Valve-provided .deb to /. I then
created the package set and emerged
it; it failed while compiling glibc. Something during these steps
apparently broke glibc/gcc
(with a different error than I am asking about now), so I had to reinstall
them fro
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:09:36AM -0300, Crístian Viana wrote:
> hi,
>
> when I use valgrind, it shows hundreds of warnings related to glibc. here's
> one example, from "valgrind ls":
>
> ==10023== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
> ==10023==at 0x55
On 04/18/10 11:00, Tanstaafl wrote:
> Crap, doesn't look like this will work...
>
> After masking gcc (and glibc - same argument there), I get:
>
> emerge -pev world
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "virtual/libc" have been masked.
> !!! One of the foll
non (Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:06:45 +0200)
> > > >
> > > > > A multitude of apps that used to run just fine now give "free():
> > > > > invalid pointer" errors since I upgraded to glibc-2.11
> > > >
> > > > Which ones are these? I i
earch before making
the switch. Plus, you can swap in a linuxthreads glibc at any time if need
be, right?
yeah, but problems are known. So there are good reasons NOT to use ntplonly or
to advise to use it generally.
And if you mean 'reemerge glibc' you are right, you can alw
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 10:45:00 -0700 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ZM> Robert Cernansky wrote:
ZM> > So I decide to downgrade glibc first, but it did not help. Then I
downgrade
ZM> > linux-headers and re-emerge (downgraded) glibc and samba (for sure). Again
ZM>
On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:35 +0200, pk wrote:
> Questions (I don't know the answers): Doesn't glibc need a rebuild after
> kernel reconfiguration (such as CONFIG_BSD_...)? I mean glibc doesn't
> support (kernel) options that the kernel doesn't support, right? Is
&g
> > > > forcing # of jobs to 1
> > >
> > > Does this coincide with (re)emerging glibc?
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I did re-emerge glibc on that day, at that time.
> > Must be there's a connection that I didn't find in my searching the
> >
-headers-2.6.36.1" ?
>
> There is at least a theoretical benifit if you set NPTL_KERN_VER=2.6.38
> in make.conf and recompile glibc. That way glibc could use things not
> present in older kernels.
>
> I haven't researched if there are any such things, perhaps someone e
possible solution on:
>
> http://tomcopeland.blogs.com/juniordeveloper/2006/04/ejabberd_erlang.html
>
> But actually I have not a single idea how to apply this patch.
You can see a more proper version of the same patch by typing:
# cat `portageq portdir`/dev-lang/erlang/files/glibc-2.4-f
roblems starting Mercury i think it's irrelated but i
> thought i'd post it maybe there's sth i missed
>
> $ Mercury/Mercury
> awk: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot open
> shared object file: No such file or directory
hm, libdl.so is owned by
"Richard Fish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 May 2006 12:44:37 -0500, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So it appears then that something is wrong with this update process.
> > emerge -v -uDp gcc doesn't want to update the current gcc whi
hnews mode: get articles, get headers, get bodies, post articles
erased stale pid 1097 host quattro.stroller.uk.eu.org lockfile /
var/spool/news/leaf.node/lock.file
*** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev):
0x08067d98 ***
Aborted
$ sudo rm /var/spool/news/leaf.node/lock
Mike Gilbert wrote:
[...]
> >> You're trying to make a multilib glibc, and your kernel does not
> >> support one of the resulting ABIs (most likely
> >> CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION needs to be turned on in the kernel
> >> configuration to be abl
On 08/01/2014 20:03, Tanstaafl wrote:
> On 2014-01-08 11:54 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
>> I just updated glibc to 2.1.17, and got the following error at the very
>> end of the emerge:
>>
>>> /usr/bin/python2.7: relocation error: /lib64/libresolv.so.2: symbol
>>>
On 18 July 2014 11:18:27 CEST, Dale wrote:
>J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> Update:
>>
>> No issues with glibc.
>>
>> I am not doing any parallel builds (eg. default of -j 1 is used)
>>
>>
>>
>> Let me know if you want any files for
2014-07-18 3:18 GMT-06:00 Dale :
>
>
> I tried the same tarball you are using and it still failed. Basically, I
> unpacked the thing, copied over the portage tree and distfiles and tried to
> emerge glibc and it failed. It has to be something wrong on my end here.
> Heck,
Don't forget to reply to the list... I say after I forgot to change the
to address on the email I just sent.
On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 16:37 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 15:09 -0400, Alan Grimes wrote:
> > > - sys-libs/glibc-
just fine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Checking to see if it's a distcc problem, now. If it is, it'll only be
>>>>> the third time I've ever had issues from distcc, and the first time a
>>>>> distcc issue resulted in a successful build of a
so: undefined reference to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
/usr/qt/3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
===
The kopete log contains much the same. It seems like I have faulty glibc
build settings, and this will happen f
Strange, never had problems in that regard.
Am 23.04.2012 05:24 schrieb :
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:12:48 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Apr 23, 2012 1:09 A...
Bless those who keeps on telling people there is no need to rebuild
packages after glibc upgrade, for they must have not used pam or
It is recommended to do an emerge -e system after that.
I do always:
emerge -e system
revdep-rebuild
emerge -e system
Jose Moreira wrote:
> hello, i'm recompiling glibc to suport userlocales. do i nedd to
> recompile my software?
>
>
begin:vcard
fn:Uwe Klosa
n:Klosa;Uwe
org:U
On Friday 29 April 2005 12:46, Jose Moreira wrote:
> hello, i'm recompiling glibc to suport userlocales. do i nedd to
> recompile my software?
no, you do not need to recompile ANYTHING.
And do yourself a favour and do not do an emerge -e /system/world. There are
big chances that som
On Monday 08 August 2005 07:28, Rodrigo Lazo Paz wrote:
> Hi, I've been looking and I haven't found a way to
> record the emerge's messages like
>
> * Warning! Gentoo's GLIBC with NPTL enabled now
> behaves like the
> * glibc from almost every other distrib
I went through the gcc upgrade and discovered that ssp no longer works
(suppose it was documented somewhere - but I missed it)
So I'm trying to reverse the upgrade process (this time using using a
hardened profile) and glibc won't allow me to downgrade.
How do I get around th
On Sun, 10 Apr 2022 at 15:32, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I know that the news item gives dire warnings about not unmerging
> glibc. Can I safely unmerge virtual/libcrypt and replace it?
>
>
Sure, but you would probably get the same errors. I'm suspecting you have
some USE flags
ld try this. Furthermore, the reasoning behind it made
> sense to me and it sounded like a challenge (I can't resist a good
> challenge). However, I am still encountering an error at the point where
> I am at section 7.1 Building the Toolkit: GCC 3.3.5 in the document I
> referenced abo
;t resist a good
> > challenge). However, I am still encountering an error at the point where
> > I am at section 7.1 Building the Toolkit: GCC 3.3.5 in the document I
> > referenced above. I have determined that the error occurs quite a ways
> > into the glibc portion of the
ring an error at the point where
I am at section 7.1 Building the Toolkit: GCC 3.3.5 in the document I
referenced above. I have determined that the error occurs quite a ways
into the glibc portion of the `emerge gcc-config glibc binutils gcc' by
running each command separately.
I investigated
On 01/16/2014 08:07 PM, lovely2 wrote:
> I doubt this is a memory problem. I've just had the same problem with
> glibc-2.17 and python. I manually went back to glibc-2.16 and everything is
> fine again. I then tried re-emerging all the python versions with glibc-2.16
> inst
ion failed..."
>>> Install ekopath-4.0.12.1_pre20121102 into
/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ekopath-4.0.12.1_pre20121102/image/ category
dev-lang
Problem running post-install step. Installation may not complete correctly
Configuration failed. Make sure you have glibc developement files
tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> emerge -e @world installs glibc
>
> On my system this kills the build of pulseaudio...which in turn make
> my linux PC one of the most quiet ones...sigh:
>
>>From the compilation output of pulseaudio:
> Wfloat-equal -Wmissin
rcache.o variable.o version.o vpath.o hash.o remote-stub.o
>>>> glob/libglob.a -ldl
>>>> glob/libglob.a(glob.o): In function `glob_in_dir':
>>>> glob.c:(.text+0x2ed): undefined reference to `__alloca'
>>>
>>> IIRC, that's a missi
present in the updated kernel headers.
Should I re-emerge glibc?
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I stand corrected.
BillK
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 09:23 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:30:17 +0900, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> > Also, dont the current livecd's do a stage 3 install, which means there
> > should be a quickpkg'd glibc on them?
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> However you do it, you should emerge glibc, either from source or the
> package, once you have a working system.
>
Yes. After it became operational, still booted from the cd, I did a
total rebuil
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
>
> I assume you've changed your CHOST when upgrading glibc without having a clue
> about you were doing...
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml
>
Yes, now I remember something like that.
Don't know if it was glibc, but some
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:42:43 -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > treat dev-libs # emerge -avk =glib-1.2.10-r5
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > Calculating dependencies -
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy &qu
On 9/6/06, Timothy A. Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
srvweb-01 ~ # emerge -V
Portage 2.1-r2 (default-linux/x86/no-nptl, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2,
BTW, you probably do _not_ want to be on a no-nptl profile. The
current glibc is nptl only, so you will probably need to update your
p
Dale gmail.com> writes:
> >>> I recently did a upgrade which included glibc. Now both Firefox and
> >>> Seamonkey has problems starting.
> Well revdep-rebuild came back clean. I'm doing a emerge -e world at the
> moment. I'm hoping it is just som
701 - 800 of 2929 matches
Mail list logo
