Re: [gentoo-user] reflexive dependencies?
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 14:24 -0600, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: > Once I selected 2.6 (with Rubygems) To clarify: this should read "ruby26 (with Rubygems)
[gentoo-user] RUBY?!?!?!?
Gah, the water block on my threadripper is clogged again. =\ Just
ordered a fresh one, will try to clean the current one and keep it as a
spare.
I had been coasting for about 6 months but a power dip reset the machine
so I'm updating.
I had a nightmare of a time getting things to the point where I was
getting any updating done at all, it fought me on every step. (was on
kernel 5.9), I can't allow the linux_headers to get too far from the
actual kernel so I had to upgrade to 6.2 although I have no idea what is
supposed to be improved by 6.2
Right now the biggest roadblock is rubygems.
I have cleared the decks and wiped ALL dev-ruby packages off the system.
Obviously, "Ruby" is set in my make.conf but this setting is not seen
from the make script and the thing wastes my time...
IS THERE EVEN A WORKAROUND FOR THIS OR IS IT JUST BROKEN???
### make.conf
# portage complains if absent.
#RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby25 ruby26 "
RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby31 ruby32 "
RUBY="ruby31"
#### console
tortoise ~ # emerge --oneshot rubygems
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
Dependency resolution took 2.75 s.
[ebuild N ] dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo USE="server -test"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby30 ruby31 ruby32 -ruby27" 0 KiB
[ebuild N ] dev-ruby/builder-3.2.4-r1:3.2::gentoo USE="-doc -test"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby30 ruby31 ruby32 -ruby27" 0 KiB
Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Emerging (1 of 2) dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo
>>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6, Log file:
>>> '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/temp/build.log'
>>> Jobs: 0 of 2 complete, 1 failed Load avg: 1.67,
1.64, 1.48
* Package: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6:0
* Repository: gentoo
* Maintainer: r...@gentoo.org
* USE: abi_x86_64 amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux
ruby_targets_ruby30 ruby_targets_ruby31 ruby_targets_ruby32 server
userland_GNU
* FEATURES: network-sandbox nostrip sandbox splitdebug userpriv
usersandbox
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking rubygems-3.4.6.tar.gz to
/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work/all
>>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work
>>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
* Running prepare phase for all
* Running prepare phase for all
* Adjusting to prefix /
* operating_system.rb ...
[ ok ]
* Running source copy phase for ruby30
* Running source copy phase for ruby31
* Running source copy phase for ruby32
>>> Source prepared.
>>> Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
>>> Source configured.
>>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
* Running compile phase for ruby30
* Running compile phase for ruby31
* Running compile phase for ruby32
>>> Source compiled.
* Skipping make test/check due to ebuild restriction.
>>> Test phase [disabled because of RESTRICT=test]: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6
>>> Install dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6 into
/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/image
* Running install phase for ruby30
* ERROR: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo failed (install phase):
* $RUBY is not set
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 136: Called src_install
* environment, line 1992: Called ruby-ng_src_install
* environment, line 1721: Called _ruby_each_implementation
'each_ruby_install'
* environment, line 429: Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'ruby30'
'each_ruby_install'
* environment, line 566: Called each_ruby_install
* environment, line 687: Called doruby '-r' 'rubygems' 'rubygems.rb'
* environment, line 672: Called die
* The specific snippet of code:
* [[ -z ${RUBY} ]] && die "\$RUBY is not set";
*
* If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
'=dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo'`,
* the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
'=dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo'`.
* The complete build log is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/temp/build.log'.
* The ebuild environment file is located at
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/temp/environment'.
* Working directory:
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work/ruby30/rubygems-3.4.6/lib'
* S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work/ruby30/rubygems-3.4.6'
* Messages for package dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6:
* ERROR: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo failed (install phase):
* $RUBY is not set
*
* Call stack:
* ebuild.sh, line 136: Called src_install
* environment, line 1992: Called ruby-ng_src_install
* environment, line 1721: Called _ruby_each_implementation
'each_ruby_insta
Re: [gentoo-user] RUBY?!?!?!?
On Monday, 3 April 2023 18:16:30 BST Alan Grimes wrote:
> Gah, the water block on my threadripper is clogged again. =\ Just
> ordered a fresh one, will try to clean the current one and keep it as a
> spare.
>
>
> I had been coasting for about 6 months but a power dip reset the machine
> so I'm updating.
>
> I had a nightmare of a time getting things to the point where I was
> getting any updating done at all, it fought me on every step. (was on
> kernel 5.9), I can't allow the linux_headers to get too far from the
> actual kernel so I had to upgrade to 6.2 although I have no idea what is
> supposed to be improved by 6.2
>
> Right now the biggest roadblock is rubygems.
>
> I have cleared the decks and wiped ALL dev-ruby packages off the system.
> Obviously, "Ruby" is set in my make.conf but this setting is not seen
> from the make script and the thing wastes my time...
>
> IS THERE EVEN A WORKAROUND FOR THIS OR IS IT JUST BROKEN???
Have you looked at this page:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Ruby
> ### make.conf
> # portage complains if absent.
> #RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby25 ruby26 "
> RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby31 ruby32 "
> RUBY="ruby31"
>
> console
> tortoise ~ # emerge --oneshot rubygems
>
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
>
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> Dependency resolution took 2.75 s.
>
> [ebuild N ] dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo USE="server -test"
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby30 ruby31 ruby32 -ruby27" 0 KiB
> [ebuild N ] dev-ruby/builder-3.2.4-r1:3.2::gentoo USE="-doc -test"
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby30 ruby31 ruby32 -ruby27" 0 KiB
>
> Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
>
> >>> Verifying ebuild manifests
> >>> Emerging (1 of 2) dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo
> >>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6, Log file:
> >>> '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/temp/build.log'
> >>> Jobs: 0 of 2 complete, 1 failed Load avg: 1.67,
>
> 1.64, 1.48
> * Package:dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6:0
> * Repository: gentoo
> * Maintainer: r...@gentoo.org
> * USE:abi_x86_64 amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux
> ruby_targets_ruby30 ruby_targets_ruby31 ruby_targets_ruby32 server
> userland_GNU
> * FEATURES: network-sandbox nostrip sandbox splitdebug userpriv
> usersandbox
>
> >>> Unpacking source...
> >>> Unpacking rubygems-3.4.6.tar.gz to
>
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work/all
>
> >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work
> >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
>
> * Running prepare phase for all
> * Running prepare phase for all
> * Adjusting to prefix /
> * operating_system.rb ...
> [ ok ]
> * Running source copy phase for ruby30
> * Running source copy phase for ruby31
> * Running source copy phase for ruby32
>
> >>> Source prepared.
> >>> Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
> >>> Source configured.
> >>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/work ...
>
> * Running compile phase for ruby30
> * Running compile phase for ruby31
> * Running compile phase for ruby32
>
> >>> Source compiled.
>
> * Skipping make test/check due to ebuild restriction.
>
> >>> Test phase [disabled because of RESTRICT=test]: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6
> >>>
> >>> Install dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6 into
>
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6/image
> * Running install phase for ruby30
> * ERROR: dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo failed (install phase):
> * $RUBY is not set
> *
> * Call stack:
> * ebuild.sh, line 136: Called src_install
> * environment, line 1992: Called ruby-ng_src_install
> * environment, line 1721: Called _ruby_each_implementation
> 'each_ruby_install'
> * environment, line 429: Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'ruby30'
> 'each_ruby_install'
> * environment, line 566: Called each_ruby_install
> * environment, line 687: Called doruby '-r' 'rubygems' 'rubygems.rb'
> * environment, line 672: Called die
> * The specific snippet of code:
> * [[ -z ${RUBY} ]] && die "\$RUBY is not set";
> *
> * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info
> '=dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.6::gentoo'`,
> * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv
> '=dev-ruby/ru
[gentoo-user] Re: rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote: I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight. The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages and then portage chose what to merge afresh. unmerge or depclean? unmerge is less safe and may leave your system in a bad state. emerge -N is a better way to handle this situation. /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) This file is part of rubygems, which in turn is a dependency of ruby itself. emerge rubygems manually first. Kind regards, Hans
[gentoo-user] advice on transitioning from package.use file to package.use directory
Having read the email exchange on the possibility of using
'package.use' as a directory, I thought I would give that a try.
Here is what I have attempted so far.
cd /etc/portage
mv package.use package.use.COPY
mkdir package.use
cd package.use
awk -F'[/\t ]+' '{printf("echo \047%s\047 >> ", $0); sub("-[0-9]+.*",
"", $2); print $2}' ../package.use.COPY
NOTE; the awk output just generates the command lines for the shell to
run. If the output is acceptable, it should be piped through to the
shell.
Here is the contents of the original 'package.use' file:
cat package.use
=dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu
>=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora
>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip
>=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp
media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype gnutls
httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4 stream svga
theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv
net-print/hplip scanner qt4
sys-apps/busybox -pam
sys-devel/gcc objc
sys-process/cronie anacron
x11-base/xorg-server udev
xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks
xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors
NOTE: There are two entries for 'rubygems' there.
Here is the awk script output:
echo '=dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite' >> python
echo '>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> json
echo '>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> racc
echo '>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rake
echo '>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rdoc
echo '>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
echo '>=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu' >> harfbuzz
echo '>=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora' >> ffmpeg
echo '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip' >> zlib
echo '>=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
echo 'gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp' >> gvfs
echo 'media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype
gnutls httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4
stream svga theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv' >> vlc
echo 'net-print/hplip scanner qt4' >> hplip
echo 'sys-apps/busybox -pam' >> busybox
echo 'sys-devel/gcc objc' >> gcc
echo 'sys-process/cronie anacron' >> cronie
echo 'x11-base/xorg-server udev' >> xorg-server
echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks' >> xfce4-power-manager
echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors' >>
xfce4-sensors-plugin
The two 'rubygems' entries I had in the original 'package.use' file
went into a single 'rubygems' file:
cat rubygems
>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
Is this format acceptable? Or should I have used two separate files,
one for 'dev-lang/rubygems', and another for 'virtual/rubygems'?
I have run 'emerge -auUND @world' since the transition, which voiced
no complaints so far.
The list's input would be appreciated.
[gentoo-user] Ruby is borked on my system
Ive ran into a brick wall trying to update one of my servers. I have been using Gentoo for a long time but I haven't been following it as closely for the past year so maybe there have been changes Im not aware of. Ive already Googled and checked archives without really solving my problem. When I try to update world I get this: # emerge -uDatvk world * IMPORTANT: 2 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'. * Use eselect news to read news items. These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating dependencies... done! !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: dev-ruby/rubygems:0 (dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.14::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by =dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.2[ruby_targets_ruby20] required by (dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353::gentoo, installed) dev-ruby/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby20] required by (virtual/rubygems-6::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.14::gentoo, installed) pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot) !!! Enabling --newuse and --update might solve this conflict. !!! If not, it might help emerge to give a more specific suggestion. !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18] have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - virtual/rubygems-7::gentoo (masked by: ~x86 keyword) - virtual/rubygems-5::gentoo (masked by: missing keyword) (dependency required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[-test] [installed]) (dependency required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353[rdoc] [installed]) (dependency required by virtual/rubygems-6 [ebuild]) (dependency required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [installed]) For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook. From reading other threads I have set RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to be ruby19 ruby20 and Ive used eselect to set the default config to ruby19. I have not been able to fix this problem so far. Any ideas how to proceed? --
[gentoo-user] Strange problem with Ruby (vagrant)
Hi.
I need to use Vagrant but it doesn't work with strange error message:
> $ vagrant
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> 2: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> 1: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in
> `require'
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in
> `require': cannot load such file -- vagrant (LoadError)
> 8: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> 7: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:34:in
> `require'
> 6: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:123:in
> `rescue in require'
> 5: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:218:in
> `try_activate'
> 4: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1417:in
> `activate'
> 3: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in
> `activate_dependencies'
> 2: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in `each'
> 1: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1446:in
> `block in activate_dependencies'
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:313:in
> `to_specs': Could not find 'rubyzip' (~> 1.2.2) - did find:
> [rubyzip-2.0.0] (Gem::MissingSpecVersionError)
> Checked in
> 'GEM_PATH=/home/skobkin/.gem/ruby/2.6.0:/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0:/usr/local/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0',
> execute `gem env` for more information
> 9: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> 8: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:34:in
> `require'
> 7: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:123:in
> `rescue in require'
> 6: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:217:in
> `try_activate'
> 5: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:224:in
> `rescue in try_activate'
> 4: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1417:in
> `activate'
> 3: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in
> `activate_dependencies'
> 2: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in `each'
> 1: from
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1446:in
> `block in activate_dependencies'
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:313:in
> `to_specs': Could not find 'rubyzip' (~> 1.2.2) - did find:
> [rubyzip-2.0.0] (Gem::MissingSpecVersionError)
> Checked in
> 'GEM_PATH=/home/skobkin/.gem/ruby/2.6.0:/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0:/usr/local/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0',
> execute `gem env` for more information
I'm calling it's strange because I have rubyzip package in my system (as
said in error message).
> $ eix rubyzip
> [I] dev-ruby/rubyzip
> Available versions:
> (1) 1.2.2^t (~)1.2.3^t (~)1.2.4^t (~)1.3.0^t
> (2) (~)2.0.0^t
> {test RUBY_TARGETS="ruby24 ruby25 ruby26"}
> Installed versions: 2.0.0(2)^t(01:44:09 PM 11/19/2019)(-test
> RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 -ruby24 -ruby25")
> Homepage: https://github.com/rubyzip/rubyzip
> Description: A ruby library for reading and writing zip files
I've decided that it's typical dependency problem and installed
rubyzip-1.2.2. Then I've got new error:
> $ vagrant
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:2298:in
> `raise_if_conflicts': Unable to activate vagrant_cloud-2.0.3, because
> rest-client-2.1.0 conflicts with rest-client (~> 2.0.2)
> (Gem::ConflictError)
>
Then I've checked which packages require rest-client and got these:
> $ equery d rest-client
> * These packages depend on rest-client:
> app-emulation/vagrant-2.2.6 (ruby_targets_ruby24 ?
> dev-ruby/rest-client:2[ruby_targets_ruby24])
> (ruby_targets_ruby25 ?
> dev-ruby/rest-client:2[ruby_targets_ruby25])
> (ruby_targets_ruby26 ?
> dev-ruby/rest-client:2[ruby_targets_ruby26])
> dev-ruby/vagrant_cloud-2.0.3 (ruby_targets_ruby24 ?
> >=dev-ruby/rest-client-2.0.2[ruby_targets_ruby24])
> (ruby_targets_ruby25 ?
> >=dev-ruby/rest-client-2.0.2[ruby_targets_ruby25])
> (ruby_targets_ruby26 ?
> >=dev-ruby/rest-client-2.0.2[ruby_targets_ruby26])
So I've removed rest-client-2.1.0 and installed 2.0.2. And then:
> $
> vagrant
Re: [gentoo-user] Strange problem with Ruby (vagrant)
Op woensdag 20 november 2019 09:32:17 CET schreef Alexey Eschenko:
> Hi.
>
> I need to use Vagrant but it doesn't work with strange error message:
> > $ vagrant
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > 2: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> > 1: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in
> > `require'
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in
> > `require': cannot load such file -- vagrant (LoadError)
> > 8: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> > 7: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:34:in
> > `require'
> > 6: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:123:in
> > `rescue in require'
> > 5: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:218:in
> > `try_activate'
> > 4: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1417:in
> > `activate'
> > 3: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in
> > `activate_dependencies'
> > 2: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in `each'
> > 1: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1446:in
> > `block in activate_dependencies'
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:313:in
> > `to_specs': Could not find 'rubyzip' (~> 1.2.2) - did find:
> > [rubyzip-2.0.0] (Gem::MissingSpecVersionError)
> > Checked in
> > 'GEM_PATH=/home/skobkin/.gem/ruby/2.6.0:/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0:/usr/lo
> > cal/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0', execute `gem env` for more information
> > 9: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0/gems/vagrant-2.2.6/bin/vagrant:88:in `'
> > 8: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:34:in
> > `require'
> > 7: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:123:in
> > `rescue in require'
> > 6: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:217:in
> > `try_activate'
> > 5: from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems.rb:224:in
> > `rescue in try_activate'
> > 4: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1417:in
> > `activate'
> > 3: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in
> > `activate_dependencies'
> > 2: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1435:in `each'
> > 1: from
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1446:in
> > `block in activate_dependencies'
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/dependency.rb:313:in
> > `to_specs': Could not find 'rubyzip' (~> 1.2.2) - did find:
> > [rubyzip-2.0.0] (Gem::MissingSpecVersionError)
> > Checked in
> > 'GEM_PATH=/home/skobkin/.gem/ruby/2.6.0:/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0:/usr/lo
> > cal/lib64/ruby/gems/2.6.0', execute `gem env` for more information
>
> I'm calling it's strange because I have rubyzip package in my system (as
> said in error message).
>
> > $ eix rubyzip
> > [I] dev-ruby/rubyzip
> > Available versions:
> > (1)1.2.2^t (~)1.2.3^t (~)1.2.4^t (~)1.3.0^t
> > (2)(~)2.0.0^t
> >{test RUBY_TARGETS="ruby24 ruby25 ruby26"}
> > Installed versions: 2.0.0(2)^t(01:44:09 PM 11/19/2019)(-test
> > RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 -ruby24 -ruby25")
> > Homepage:https://github.com/rubyzip/rubyzip
> > Description: A ruby library for reading and writing zip files
>
> I've decided that it's typical dependency problem and installed
>
> rubyzip-1.2.2. Then I've got new error:
> > $ vagrant
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >
> > /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.6.0/rubygems/specification.rb:2298:in
> > `raise_if_conflicts': Unable to activate vagrant_cloud-2.0.3, because
> > rest-client-2.1.0 conflicts with rest-client (~> 2.0.2)
> > (Gem::ConflictError)
> >
>
> Then I've checked which packages require rest-client and got these:
> > $ equery d rest-client
> > * These packages depend on rest-client:
> > app-emulation/vagrant-2.2.6 (ruby_targets_ruby24 ?
> > dev-ruby/rest-client:2[ruby_targets_ruby24])
> > (ruby_targets_ruby25 ?
&g
Re: [gentoo-user] rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Monday 24 Mar 2014 21:28:56 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) The missing file is there, I think: # ls -la /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34951 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb What now? It can't load what is on line 30 of that file; there'll be a require instruction, and that require instruction would bring in another file. Aha! That's what it meant. :-) The line in question is: require 'rubygems/defaults' Where should I look for that? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ruby is borked on my system
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014, Hans de Graaff wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:36:00 -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18] have been masked. You still have packages on your system that have been installed with the ruby18 RUBY_TARGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is from the output, but I suspect dev-ruby/rubygems? Re-emerging the packages still installed for ruby18 should fix this. I rebuiltd rubygems and the virtual but still no go. Then I rebuilt rdoc (which pulled in a bunch of other stuff) but now emerge world says I have nothing left to build. Hopefully I can revdep-rebuild and all should be OK. Thanks, -- A
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Tuesday 25 Mar 2014 06:31:51 Hans de Graaff wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote: I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight. The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages and then portage chose what to merge afresh. unmerge or depclean? unmerge is less safe and may leave your system in a bad state. emerge -N is a better way to handle this situation. /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) This file is part of rubygems, which in turn is a dependency of ruby itself. emerge rubygems manually first. Thanks Hans, I did just that and the problem was solved. Also thank you for your help on IRC yesterday. :-) -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] emerge ruby fails
I haven't had much of a chance to google this, but I did update glibc as that seems like it's related to some ruby problems. Ruby gems fails to install with the following error (this is the topmost build error?): * Messages for package dev-ruby/rubygems-0.9.4-r2: * * ERROR: dev-ruby/rubygems-0.9.4-r2 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 1701: Called dyn_compile thanks, Thufir -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] emerge ruby fails
Thufir wrote: I haven't had much of a chance to google this, but I did update glibc as that seems like it's related to some ruby problems. Ruby gems fails to install with the following error (this is the topmost build error?): * Messages for package dev-ruby/rubygems-0.9.4-r2: * * ERROR: dev-ruby/rubygems-0.9.4-r2 failed. * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 1701: Called dyn_compile thanks, Thufir It's not the topmost build error, above that. -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Ruby is borked on my system
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:36:00 -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18] have been masked. You still have packages on your system that have been installed with the ruby18 RUBY_TARGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is from the output, but I suspect dev-ruby/rubygems? Re-emerging the packages still installed for ruby18 should fix this. Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using www-apps/jekyll?
On 2021.10.27 09:59, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 October 2021 14:44:09 BST Pascal Schorde wrote:
> did you have dev-ruby/rubygems installed? See
> https://jekyllrb.com/docs/#prerequisites
Yes, but at version 3.0:
$ eix dev-ruby/rubygems
[I] dev-ruby/rubygems
Available versions: 3.0.3^t 3.0.9^t 3.1.6^t (~)3.2.14^t{tbz2}
[M]
(~)3.2.22^t{tbz2} {server test RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby27 ruby30"}
Installed versions: 3.2.14^t{tbz2}(09:19:26 10/26/21)(-server
-test
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby30 -ruby27")
One possibility occurred to me: is having two ruby versions installed
at once
the problem? I already had 3.0 installed, the current Gentoo version,
but
jekyll needs 2.6. To test this idea, I'd have to downgrade the whole
system to
2.6; I don't know whether that's even feasible now.
Ruby is slotted, so you can have 2.6 and 3.0 installed together. You
would then need to rebuild rubygems to target both of them. There is
also a virtual/rubygems. I'm not really sure of it's function, but it
seems to just specify a minimum version of rubygems per targetted
version of ruby.
Re: [gentoo-user] rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Monday 24 Mar 2014 23:23:08 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:44:23 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 24 Mar 2014 21:28:56 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) The missing file is there, I think: # ls -la /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34951 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb What now? It can't load what is on line 30 of that file; there'll be a require instruction, and that require instruction would bring in another file. Aha! That's what it meant. :-) The line in question is: require 'rubygems/defaults' Where should I look for that? Not that I know Ruby programming; but I assume that either looks for a defaults file in a rubygems directory, or it looks for a defaults module inside a rubygems file. You might want to file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org for the Ruby maintainers to fix this dependency. Problem solved. I had to remerge rubygems. When I used --depclean only rubygems1 was removed. It seems it needed to have rebygems 4 and 6 rebuilt. I haven't had this problem on two other boxen, so I am hesitant to report a bug. Probably I did something wrong. Thank you Tom! :-) -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] advice on transitioning from package.use file to package.use directory
* Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> [150831 15:35]:
> Having read the email exchange on the possibility of using
> 'package.use' as a directory, I thought I would give that a try.
>
> Here is what I have attempted so far.
>
> cd /etc/portage
> mv package.use package.use.COPY
> mkdir package.use
> cd package.use
> awk -F'[/\t ]+' '{printf("echo \047%s\047 >> ", $0); sub("-[0-9]+.*",
> "", $2); print $2}' ../package.use.COPY
>
> NOTE; the awk output just generates the command lines for the shell to
> run. If the output is acceptable, it should be piped through to the
> shell.
>
> Here is the contents of the original 'package.use' file:
>
> cat package.use
> =dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
> >=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu
> >=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora
> >=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip
> >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
> gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp
> media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype gnutls
> httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4 stream svga
> theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv
> net-print/hplip scanner qt4
> sys-apps/busybox -pam
> sys-devel/gcc objc
> sys-process/cronie anacron
> x11-base/xorg-server udev
> xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks
> xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors
>
> NOTE: There are two entries for 'rubygems' there.
>
> Here is the awk script output:
>
> echo '=dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite' >> python
> echo '>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> json
> echo '>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> racc
> echo '>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rake
> echo '>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rdoc
> echo '>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
> echo '>=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu' >> harfbuzz
> echo '>=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora' >> ffmpeg
> echo '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip' >> zlib
> echo '>=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
> echo 'gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp' >> gvfs
> echo 'media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype
> gnutls httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4
> stream svga theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv' >> vlc
> echo 'net-print/hplip scanner qt4' >> hplip
> echo 'sys-apps/busybox -pam' >> busybox
> echo 'sys-devel/gcc objc' >> gcc
> echo 'sys-process/cronie anacron' >> cronie
> echo 'x11-base/xorg-server udev' >> xorg-server
> echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks' >> xfce4-power-manager
> echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors' >>
> xfce4-sensors-plugin
>
> The two 'rubygems' entries I had in the original 'package.use' file
> went into a single 'rubygems' file:
>
> cat rubygems
> >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
> >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
>
> Is this format acceptable? Or should I have used two separate files,
> one for 'dev-lang/rubygems', and another for 'virtual/rubygems'?
>
> I have run 'emerge -auUND @world' since the transition, which voiced
> no complaints so far.
>
> The list's input would be appreciated.
Those should all be fine. I tend to make a file per package but I think
you could have just moved your original package.use into the
/etc/portage/package.use directory and everything would be fine (aside
from you not gaining any benefit from separate files.)
Todd
Re: [gentoo-user] advice on transitioning from package.use file to package.use directory
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Todd Goodman <t...@bonedaddy.net> wrote:
> * Alexander Kapshuk <alexander.kaps...@gmail.com> [150831 15:35]:
>> Having read the email exchange on the possibility of using
>> 'package.use' as a directory, I thought I would give that a try.
>>
>> Here is what I have attempted so far.
>>
>> cd /etc/portage
>> mv package.use package.use.COPY
>> mkdir package.use
>> cd package.use
>> awk -F'[/\t ]+' '{printf("echo \047%s\047 >> ", $0); sub("-[0-9]+.*",
>> "", $2); print $2}' ../package.use.COPY
>>
>> NOTE; the awk output just generates the command lines for the shell to
>> run. If the output is acceptable, it should be piped through to the
>> shell.
>>
>> Here is the contents of the original 'package.use' file:
>>
>> cat package.use
>> =dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite
>> >=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu
>> >=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora
>> >=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip
>> >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp
>> media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype gnutls
>> httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4 stream svga
>> theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv
>> net-print/hplip scanner qt4
>> sys-apps/busybox -pam
>> sys-devel/gcc objc
>> sys-process/cronie anacron
>> x11-base/xorg-server udev
>> xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks
>> xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors
>>
>> NOTE: There are two entries for 'rubygems' there.
>>
>> Here is the awk script output:
>>
>> echo '=dev-lang/python-2.7.9-r1 sqlite' >> python
>> echo '>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.2-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> json
>> echo '>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> racc
>> echo '>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rake
>> echo '>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r2 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rdoc
>> echo '>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
>> echo '>=media-libs/harfbuzz-0.9.38 icu' >> harfbuzz
>> echo '>=media-video/ffmpeg-2.6.3 theora' >> ffmpeg
>> echo '>=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.8-r1 minizip' >> zlib
>> echo '>=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21' >> rubygems
>> echo 'gnome-base/gvfs -http gphoto2 mtp' >> gvfs
>> echo 'media-video/vlc a52 aac bidi cdda cdio dts dvd flac freetype
>> gnutls httpd libass live lua mad matroska mpeg ogg oggvorbis qt4
>> stream svga theora vcd vlm wxwindows xv' >> vlc
>> echo 'net-print/hplip scanner qt4' >> hplip
>> echo 'sys-apps/busybox -pam' >> busybox
>> echo 'sys-devel/gcc objc' >> gcc
>> echo 'sys-process/cronie anacron' >> cronie
>> echo 'x11-base/xorg-server udev' >> xorg-server
>> echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager -udisks' >> xfce4-power-manager
>> echo 'xfce-extra/xfce4-sensors-plugin hddtemp lm_sensors' >>
>> xfce4-sensors-plugin
>>
>> The two 'rubygems' entries I had in the original 'package.use' file
>> went into a single 'rubygems' file:
>>
>> cat rubygems
>> >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21
>> >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21
>>
>> Is this format acceptable? Or should I have used two separate files,
>> one for 'dev-lang/rubygems', and another for 'virtual/rubygems'?
>>
>> I have run 'emerge -auUND @world' since the transition, which voiced
>> no complaints so far.
>>
>> The list's input would be appreciated.
>
> Those should all be fine. I tend to make a file per package but I think
> you could have just moved your original package.use into the
> /etc/portage/package.use directory and everything would be fine (aside
> from you not gaining any benefit from separate files.)
>
> Todd
>
Understood. Thanks.
Re: [gentoo-user] rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 22:44:23 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Monday 24 Mar 2014 21:28:56 Tom Wijsman wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) The missing file is there, I think: # ls -la /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34951 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb What now? It can't load what is on line 30 of that file; there'll be a require instruction, and that require instruction would bring in another file. Aha! That's what it meant. :-) The line in question is: require 'rubygems/defaults' Where should I look for that? Not that I know Ruby programming; but I assume that either looks for a defaults file in a rubygems directory, or it looks for a defaults module inside a rubygems file. You might want to file a bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org for the Ruby maintainers to fix this dependency. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] advice on transitioning from package.use file to package.use directory
On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:33:58 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > cat rubygems > >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21 > >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21 > > Is this format acceptable? Or should I have used two separate files, > one for 'dev-lang/rubygems', and another for 'virtual/rubygems'? Use whatever suits you, portage doesn't care whether you use one file for everything or one file for each setting. My preference is to create a file for each program I use, and put the settings for dependent packages in there, that way I know what they relate to. It also means that if I remove the package, I can remove the file too. This to my mind is the key advantage of the separate file approach, a single file is too unwieldy without extensive comments, and I am too lazy to add useful comments. But it's up to you, do whatever works for your way of thinking - it's all the same to portage. One thing to be aware of is that portage adds "auto-unmask" entries to the "last" file in package.use, so I always create a zzz-auto-unmask file then transfer entries from there to the appropriate location. -- Neil Bothwick *Libra*: /(Sept 23--Oct 23)/ An unfortunate typo on your application results in your being accepted into the Legion Of Superherpes. pgpb3WLXQEErd.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-user] advice on transitioning from package.use file to package.use directory
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:33:58 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> cat rubygems >> >=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.2.5-r1 ruby_targets_ruby21 >> >=virtual/rubygems-10 ruby_targets_ruby21 >> >> Is this format acceptable? Or should I have used two separate files, >> one for 'dev-lang/rubygems', and another for 'virtual/rubygems'? > > Use whatever suits you, portage doesn't care whether you use one file for > everything or one file for each setting. > > My preference is to create a file for each program I use, and put the > settings for dependent packages in there, that way I know what they > relate to. It also means that if I remove the package, I can remove the > file too. This to my mind is the key advantage of the separate file > approach, a single file is too unwieldy without extensive comments, and I > am too lazy to add useful comments. > > But it's up to you, do whatever works for your way of thinking - it's all > the same to portage. > > One thing to be aware of is that portage adds "auto-unmask" entries to the > "last" file in package.use, so I always create a zzz-auto-unmask file > then transfer entries from there to the appropriate location. > > > -- > Neil Bothwick > Understood. Thanks.
[gentoo-user] Rubygems and Rake problem
Hi, after a long period with a lot of problems installing Ruby Gems and Gentoo packages containing Ruby Gems, I found the following solution: I added a line s.executables = ["rake".freeze] to the file "/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.7.0/specifications/rake-13.0.1.gemspec" (and the other Ruby versions). This fixed all my problems. The longer I do research about that, I am convinced the bug is inside the "to_ruby" method in "/usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.7.0/rubygems/specification.rb", line 2423. That doesn't produce the "s.executables" line. It gets called from Portage in "/usr/portage/eclass/ruby-fakegem.eclass", line 277. What do you think? Maybe someone likes to confirm this. I will definitely not file any report or patch to neither the RubyGems nor the Rake project any more. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using www-apps/jekyll?
On Wednesday, 27 October 2021 17:25:55 BST Jack wrote: > On 2021.10.27 09:59, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > One possibility occurred to me: is having two ruby versions installed > > at once the problem? I already had 3.0 installed, the current Gentoo > > version, but jekyll needs 2.6. To test this idea, I'd have to downgrade > > the whole system to 2.6; I don't know whether that's even feasible now. > > Ruby is slotted, so you can have 2.6 and 3.0 installed together. As I thought, so it isn't that then. > You would then need to rebuild rubygems to target both of them. Yes, portage made sure of it while installing jekyll. > There is also a virtual/rubygems. I'm not really sure of it's function, but > it seems to just specify a minimum version of rubygems per targetted > version of ruby. ...and to ensure that the proper version is installed for each ruby target specified? -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using www-apps/jekyll?
On Wednesday, 27 October 2021 14:44:09 BST Pascal Schorde wrote:
> did you have dev-ruby/rubygems installed? See
> https://jekyllrb.com/docs/#prerequisites
Yes, but at version 3.0:
$ eix dev-ruby/rubygems
[I] dev-ruby/rubygems
Available versions: 3.0.3^t 3.0.9^t 3.1.6^t (~)3.2.14^t{tbz2} [M]
(~)3.2.22^t{tbz2} {server test RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby27 ruby30"}
Installed versions: 3.2.14^t{tbz2}(09:19:26 10/26/21)(-server -test
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby26 ruby30 -ruby27")
One possibility occurred to me: is having two ruby versions installed at once
the problem? I already had 3.0 installed, the current Gentoo version, but
jekyll needs 2.6. To test this idea, I'd have to downgrade the whole system to
2.6; I don't know whether that's even feasible now.
--
Regards,
Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] dev-ruby/rake-0.7.3 seems to hang?
Hi Daevid, Am Donnerstag, 21. Jun 2007, 14:56:04 -0700 schrieb Daevid Vincent: I added a bug report: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182826 -Original Message- From: Bertram Scharpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 3:56 AM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] dev-ruby/rake-0.7.3 seems to hang? Emerging (16 of 29) dev-ruby/rake-0.7.3 to / [...] Install rake-0.7.3 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.7.3/image/ category dev-ruby Exiting on signal 2 sandbox: Signal already caught and busy still cleaning up! ERROR: Interrupted /usr/portage/dev-ruby/rake/rake-0.7.3.ebuild: src_install aborted; exiting. Even worse! I detected that it's `rubygems-0.8.11-r6' that hangs when it reads the gem tarfile. So I decided to install version 0.9.4 of that. Now the installation of rubygems itself hangs. First, I thought this was caused by the old rubygems. So I deinstalled that. Now I have neither! Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[gentoo-user] Re: Rubygems and Rake problem
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:13:37 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > after a long period with a lot of problems installing Ruby Gems and > Gentoo packages containing Ruby Gems, I found the following solution: I > added a line > > s.executables = ["rake".freeze] > What do you think? Maybe someone likes to confirm this. > I will definitely not file any report or patch to neither the RubyGems > nor the Rake project any more. Could you file a but about this at https://bugs.gentoo.org/ including an example of the problem this is causing for you? As far as I'm aware this is not a known issue. Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] ruby scripts for amarok won't run anymore
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:48:11 Nistor Andrei wrote: Hi, after an emerge --depclean I noticed none of the ruby scripts work anymore. I get this error: ruby: no such file to load -- auto_gem (LoadError) Does anyone know how this can be fixed? (re-)emerge rubygems. It works! Thanks a lot! I wonder why revdep-rebuild didn't detect it? Obviously because there are no broken libs. There is not even a dependency upon rubygems. There is, however, an environment variable RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem that tells ruby to load auto_gem which obviously fails when --depclean just uninstalled it. Clearly one solution is to reinstall it as you've done. Another solution is to stop telling it to load it as explained in another post to this thread... -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[gentoo-user] Re: RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:24:30 -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: If there is a requirement for this to be in the global environment, what is the consequence of unsetting RUBYOPT in my own .bashrc (or similar)? Is that safe? Or does that break something that I simply haven't noticed yet? We don't support that setup, but you can always try. The only consequence should be that scripts won't find code installed by rubygems, unless you explicitly require 'rubygems' yourself. The reason for this is partly history, and we can't really change it now without breaking a lot of stuff. It it also there to provide more choice, since you don't need to be explicit about this in your scripts. Finally, this is the default in ruby 1.9, even without RUBYOPT set, so we now have a matching situation between the different ruby versions. Kind regards, Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] rubygems-1.9.1 error
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 + Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) The missing file is there, I think: # ls -la /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34951 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb What now? It can't load what is on line 30 of that file; there'll be a require instruction, and that require instruction would bring in another file. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] Re: Postgres gem not found by cron job
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:32:53 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Thanks for the tip. The cron environment was missing RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem -- adding it fixed the problem. Dark magic, whatever it does. It ensures that installed gems are found automatically without specifying this explicitly in your script. The other solution is to require 'rubygems' first in your script. Kind regards, Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] Routine update wants to install 3 version of Ruby + 50 others
On Monday 09 Dec 2013 18:29:46 Grant Edwards wrote: My routine more-or-less weekly update suddenly decided that it needed to install 3 versions of Ruby along with ~50 other ruby-related packages. This caused a bit of a problem, since those versions of Ruby can't coexist: (something to do with tk and threads). I've never had Ruby installed before, and after some digging around, I finally tracked it down to two things: gnome-terminal-nautilus-webkit-ruby multipath-tools-thin-provisioning-tools-ruby These both seem to be new dependancies. After uninstalling gnome-terminal, multipath-tools, and thin-provisioning-tools all is good (the update proceding sans Ruby). I understand that sometimes a maintainer decides to add a feature that requires some new dependancies, but why three different versions of Ruby all of a sudden? I found the same a few days ago, but didn't have the energy to sort out the mess. Just now I ran: $ sudo emerge -c dev-lang/ruby:1.8 dev-lang/ruby:1.9 dev-lang/ruby:2.0 json racc rake rdoc rubygems thin-provisioning-tools =virtual/rubygems-1 =virtual/rubygems-4 =virtual/rubygems-6 I'll reboot now and see if lvm2 can still mount my LVM partitions since I recompiled it without thin :-) (Later: it can!) -- Regards Peter
[gentoo-user] RUBY_TARGETS and eselect ruby
I currently set my RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to: RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 ruby21 World is updated. But ruby21 profile can't be selected with eselect: $ eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) * If I remove ruby20 from RUBY_TARGETS, there would be no profiles left. Why?
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Rubygems and Rake problem
Hi, On Thursday, 28. Jan 2021, 06:52:37 +0100, Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:13:37 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote: > > > after a long period with a lot of problems installing Ruby Gems and > > Gentoo packages containing Ruby Gems, I found the following solution: I > > added a line > > > > s.executables = ["rake".freeze] > > > What do you think? Maybe someone likes to confirm this. > > I will definitely not file any report or patch to neither the RubyGems > > nor the Rake project any more. > > Could you file a but about this at https://bugs.gentoo.org/ including an > example of the problem this is causing for you? As far as I'm aware this > is not a known issue. I tried to reproduce the problem, but the Gem installer immediately updates the Rake gem so that the messy gem specification of the old version will no longer be accessed. I suppose the error only surfaces in times when the Rake package is the newest version. Nevertheless, the missing executable specification line definitely is a bug, probably on the RubyGems side, not in Gentoo Portage. Again, and I can’t stress this enough, I'm tired of searching for bugs in these lousy written tools RubyGems and Rake. I will not make any effort to report any bugs there any more and I do not want to be responsible for anything these tools do. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone using www-apps/jekyll?
Hi Peter, did you have dev-ruby/rubygems installed? See https://jekyllrb.com/docs/#prerequisites Cheers Peter Humphrey schrieb am Mi., 27. Okt. 2021, 15:36: > On Wednesday, 27 October 2021 14:31:28 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Sorry: The site is https://jekyllrb.com/docs/ > > -- > Regards, > Peter. > > > > >
[gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20
Hello, If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his system. True or false: The correct way to appease portage's error message below is to add a bunch of ruby_targets_ruby20 use flags in /etc/portage/package.use Thank you, Chris === The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: (see package.use in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] =dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by virtual/rubygems-4 # required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[-test,ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,-doc,ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8 # required by sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.103[thin] # required by sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r5 # required by x11-libs/libfm-0.1.17-r1[udev] # required by x11-misc/pcmanfm-0.9.10 # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) =dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by virtual/rubygems-4 # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3 ruby_targets_ruby20
[gentoo-user] How can I recover Ruby 2.2?
Unfortunaly, I set in /etc/portage/make.conf variable RUBY_TARGETS to
"ruby22 ruby24" and I executed command eselect profile set 2. Now I need
to recovering these changes. I want to have Ruby 2.2. File
/etc/portage/make.conf:
# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically
# built this stage.
# Please consult /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example for a more
# detailed example.
CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
MAKEOPTS="-j5"
VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia"
#INPUT_DEVICES="libinput synaptics"
INPUT_DEVICES="libinput synaptics evdev mouse keyboard"
# WARNING: Changing your CHOST is not something that should be done lightly.
# Please consult http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml before
changing.
CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
# These are the USE and USE_EXPAND flags that were used for
# buidling in addition to what is provided by the profile.
#USE="bindist"
USE="userlocales unicode nls tools X a52 aac acl acpi alsa amd64 berkdb \
-bindist bluetooth branding bzip2 cairo cdda cdr cli colord \
consolekit cracklib crypt cups cxx dbus dri dts dvd dvdr eds \
emboss encode evo exif fam firefox flac fortran gdbm gif glamor \
-gnome -gnome-keyring -gnome-online-accounts gpm gstreamer \
gtk iconv introspection ipv6 jpeg lcms ldap libnotify \
libsecret mad mng modules mp3 mp4 mpeg multilib nautilus ncurses nptl \
ogg opengl openmp pam pango pcre pdf png policykit ppds \
-pulseaudio qt3support qt4 readline sdl seccomp session spell ssl \
startup-notification svg -systemd tcpd tiff tracker truetype \
udev udisks upower usb vorbis wxwidgets x264 xattr xcb xml \
xv xvid zlib savedconfig xinerama python cjk wifi hardened jack \
startup-notification custom-cflags java postgres curl lzma socks5 \
perl v4l fontconfig gphoto2 gsm nls odbc openal scanner threads \
vaapi xcomposite -ruby_targets_ruby24"
#USE="X a52 aac acl acpi alsa amd64 berkdb bindist bluetooth branding
bzip2 cairo cdda cdr cli colord consolekit cracklib crypt cups cxx dbus
dri dts dvd dvdr eds emboss encode evo exif fam firefox flac fortran
gdbm gif glamor gnome gnome-keyring gnome-online-accounts gpm gstreamer
gtk iconv introspection ipv6 jpeg lcms ldap libnotify libsecret mad mng
modules mp3 mp4 mpeg multilib nautilus ncurses nls nptl ogg opengl
openmp pam pango pcre pdf png policykit ppds pulseaudio qt3support qt4
readline sdl seccomp session spell ssl startup-notification svg tcpd
tiff tools tracker truetype udev udisks unicode upower usb userlocales
vorbis wxwidgets x264 xattr xcb xml xv xvid zlib"
CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse sse2"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby22"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
DISTDIR="${PORTDIR}/distfiles"
PKGDIR="${PORTDIR}/packages"
FEATURES="userfetch webrsync-gpg clean-logs binpkg-logs split-log"
PORT_LOGDIR="/var/log/portage"
PORTAGE_GPG_DIR="/var/lib/gentoo/gkeys/keyrings/gentoo/release"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.prz.rzeszow.pl
rsync://gentoo.prz.rzeszow.pl/gentoo rsync://ftp.vectranet.pl/gentoo/
http://ftp.vectranet.pl/gentoo/ ftp://ftp.vectranet.pl/gentoo/;
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/usr/bin/startx"
#FETCHCOMMAND="curl --socks5-hostname 127.0.0.1:9050 --retry 3
--connect-timeout 60 -o \"\${DISTDIR}/\${FILE}\" \"\${URI}\""
#RESUMECOMMAND="curl -C - --socks5-hostname 127.0.0.1:9050 --retry 3
--connect-timeout 60 -o \"\${DISTDIR}/\${FILE}\" \"\${URI}\""
Result of sudo -i emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse @world:
pecan@tux ~ $ sudo -i emerge --ask --update --deep --newuse @world
* IMPORTANT: 2 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
* Use eselect news read to view new items.
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild NS ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.6-r1 [2.1.0] USE="-doc {-test}"
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby22 (-ruby23) (-ruby24)"
WARNING: One or more updates/rebuilds have been skipped due to a
dependency conflict:
dev-ruby/rubygems:0
(dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.13:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
conflicts with
>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.11[ruby_targets_ruby24] required by
(virtual/rubygems-13:0/0::gentoo, installed)
^^^
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] No
Quitting.
Result of emerge -pvO virtual/rubygems:
pecan@tux ~ $ emerge -pvO virtual/rubygems
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
[ebuild UD ] virtual/rubygems-11::gentoo [13::gentoo]
RUBY_TARGETS="ruby22 (-rbx) (-ruby23) (-ruby24%*)" 0 KiB
Total: 1 package (1 downgrade), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
* IMPORTANT: 2 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
* Use eselect news read to view new items.[/code]
[b]sudo eselect ruby list[/b]:
[code]pecan@tux ~ $ sudo eselect ruby list
Available Ruby profiles:
[1] ruby22 (with Rubygems) *
[2] ruby24 (with Rubygems)
How can I recover Ruby 2.2 and completely remove Ruby 2.4?
I'm counting for help.
[gentoo-user] RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem
Hi all, The dev-ruby/rubygems ebuild adds -rauto_gem to the global RUBYOPT. This breaks my own scripts so I have removed it from /etc/env.d. So far, so good. I just tried upgrading dev-ruby/json and it failed because I did not have RUBYOPT set. Obviously, the fix was easy but now I'm wondering ... is this really the best approach? It does not seem like a good idea that the rubygems ebuild sets RUBYOPT and subsequent (Ruby Gems related) emerges break without it. Would it not be simpler and more reliable if ebuilds that need it simply execute export RUBYOPT=... prior to running? Why does it have to be in the global environment, forcing it on every user? If there is a requirement for this to be in the global environment, what is the consequence of unsetting RUBYOPT in my own .bashrc (or similar)? Is that safe? Or does that break something that I simply haven't noticed yet? Cheers, Hilco
Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk-2.2.6 - ERROR: compile
On 06/09/14 14:18, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:10:47 -0600, Joseph wrote: The log file is complaining about ruby /usr/bin/ruby ./Source/JavaScriptCore/offlineasm/generate_offset_extractor.rb ./Source/JavaScriptCore/llint/LowLevelInterpreter.asm DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore/LLIntDesiredOffsets.h /usr/bin/ruby: no such file to load -- auto_gem (LoadError) make: *** [DerivedSources/JavaScriptCore/LLIntDesiredOffsets.h] Error 1 * ERROR: net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.2.6::gentoo failed (compile phase): You either don't have ruby installed (unlikely) or it is installed but no version is selected. hat could happen if your previously selected ruby was uninstalled. What is the output from eselect ruby list -- Neil Bothwick Adolescence, n.: The stage between puberty and adultery. I think it is working, it is still compiling but I switched to ruby19 eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby18 * [2] ruby19 (with Rubygems) [3] ruby20 (with Rubygems) -- Joseph
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ruby is borked on my system
On Friday 27 June 2014 08:16:08 Hans de Graaff wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:36:00 -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18] have been masked. You still have packages on your system that have been installed with the ruby18 RUBY_TARGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is from the output, but I suspect dev-ruby/rubygems? Re-emerging the packages still installed for ruby18 should fix this. Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box at all. A little poking around revealed that the only thing that needed it was thin- provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE flags and recompiled lvm2 I could get rid of ruby altogether. This won't suit everybody, I know, but maybe it's worth considering. -- Regards Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ruby is borked on my system
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote: On Friday 27 June 2014 08:16:08 Hans de Graaff wrote: On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:36:00 -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18] have been masked. You still have packages on your system that have been installed with the ruby18 RUBY_TARGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is from the output, but I suspect dev-ruby/rubygems? Re-emerging the packages still installed for ruby18 should fix this. Some months ago I found myself wondering why I had ruby on this box at all. A little poking around revealed that the only thing that needed it was thin- provisioning. Once I'd added -thin to my USE flags and recompiled lvm2 I could get rid of ruby altogether. This won't suit everybody, I know, but maybe it's worth considering. What exactly does this do -- is it for a thin client or something? -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system
On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc: >> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost >> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world >> >> I'm getting another error: > > Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at once, drop the -D > and -N flags. > > Why are you using both the --verbose and --quiet switches? I solve this one by switching to rubby-21 eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) [2] ruby21 (with Rubygems) * and "dev-ruby/racc" compile just fine. Thanks for suggestion on dropping -D and -N flags, good idea. -- Thelma
Re: [gentoo-user] ruby scripts for amarok won't run anymore
On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:55:59 +0300, Nistor Andrei wrote: Hi, after an emerge --depclean I noticed none of the ruby scripts work anymore. I get this error: ruby: no such file to load -- auto_gem (LoadError) Have you run revdep-rebuild? I've tried revdep-rebuild, but the scripts still won't work. I'm re-emerging rubygems now... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] ruby scripts for amarok won't run anymore
On Tuesday 17 April 2007, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Dienstag, 17. April 2007 schrieb ext Nistor Andrei: Hi, after an emerge --depclean I noticed none of the ruby scripts work anymore. I get this error: ruby: no such file to load -- auto_gem (LoadError) Does anyone know how this can be fixed? (re-)emerge rubygems. It works! Thanks a lot! I wonder why revdep-rebuild didn't detect it? HTH... Dirk -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: finding qt plugins?
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Roy Wrightr...@wright.org wrote: == Installation $ emerge ruby rubygems $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com Hi, $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com ERROR: could not find gem royw-qt-rebuild locally or in a repository I know nothing about ruby or gems. Any idea what I'm missing? Thanks.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: RUBY_TARGETS and eselect ruby
On Tuesday 31 December 2013 08:03:10 Hans de Graaff wrote: Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is not very useful yet. We should be updating the ruby eselect module in the next week or so. Ok, I see. The only ruby-related packages I have installed are ruby, rubygems, rake, json, racc and rdoc, those are build-time-deps, so eselecting ruby21 will be ok for me.
[gentoo-user] Re: RUBY_TARGETS and eselect ruby
Hans de Graaff graaff at gentoo.org writes: Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is not very useful yet. We should be updating the ruby eselect module in the next week or so. Any news on this? Like Pavel the only related packages are rubygems, rake and friends since it's a pretty minimalistic box serving a Rails app which we are lifting to Ruby 2.1 next week. Support for ruby21 in eselect would be great, thanks a bunch!
Re: [gentoo-user] reflexive dependencies?
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:49 +0100, n952162 wrote: > Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks: > > /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/bundler-2.1.4/temp/environment: line 663: > rdoc: command not found > > Emerging rdoc fails because it tries to emerge bundler... > I encountered this as well. I needed to use "eselect ruby" to pick a new ruby profile. Once I selected 2.6 (with Rubygems), I was able to finish the emerge process.
Re: [gentoo-user] Permissions problem
Dienstag, 15. August 2023 16:55: > Hello list, > I'd like to develop a blog using www-apps/jekyll, which makes extensive use > of > ruby gems, of which I have no experience. On trying to install a new default > theme I get copious permission errors. > The ruby gems live in /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/3.1.0/gems, and to install > anything > in that tree I need write permission on the destination directory and execute > permission on all those above it. > This poses an obvious security problem. > When I emerged jekyll and ran its installation routine, I found I had a new ~/ > bin directory with nine executable files in it. ~/bin/update_rubygems has > similar permission problems but is more concise in reporting them > I can't add myself to a group and grant it permissions, because there seems > not to be any such group. > How do Gentoo Ruby users get around this? Hello Peter, first make sure that you don't have any "suspicious" rubygem based executables in your path that might confuse things. Some time ago I found some ancient such files in /usr/local/bin ... Next, with a default ruby/rubygems installation, a normal user should be able to install gems into their own $HOME/.gem directory. I'm doing this on several gentoo boxes, never had a problem with that approach. On one of the servers, I can run the following command, to which you can compare your environment $ gem environment RubyGems Environment: - RUBYGEMS VERSION: 3.3.26 - RUBY VERSION: 3.1.4 (2023-03-30 patchlevel 223) [x86_64-linux] - INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/3.1.0 - USER INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /home/.../.gem/ruby/3.1.0 - RUBY EXECUTABLE: /usr/bin/ruby31 - GIT EXECUTABLE: /usr/bin/git - EXECUTABLE DIRECTORY: /usr/bin - SPEC CACHE DIRECTORY: /home/.../.gem/specs - SYSTEM CONFIGURATION DIRECTORY: /etc - RUBYGEMS PLATFORMS: - ruby - x86_64-linux - GEM PATHS: - /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/3.1.0 - /home/.../.gem/ruby/3.1.0 - /usr/local/lib64/ruby/gems/3.1.0 - GEM CONFIGURATION: - :update_sources => true - :verbose => true - :backtrace => true - :bulk_threshold => 1000 - "install" => "--install-dir /home/.../.gem/ruby/3.1.0 --bindir /home/.../bin" - "uninstall" => "--install-dir /home/.../.gem/ruby/3.1.0 --bindir /home/...bin" - "update" => "--install-dir /home/.../.gem/ruby/3.1.0 --bindir /home/.../bin" - REMOTE SOURCES: - https://rubygems.org/ - SHELL PATH: - /usr/local/sbin - /usr/local/bin - /usr/sbin - /usr/bin - /sbin - /bin - /opt/bin
Re: [gentoo-user] RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem
On 01/15/2012 05:24 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, The dev-ruby/rubygems ebuild adds -rauto_gem to the global RUBYOPT. This breaks my own scripts so I have removed it from /etc/env.d. So far, so good. I just tried upgrading dev-ruby/json and it failed because I did not have RUBYOPT set. Obviously, the fix was easy but now I'm wondering ... is this really the best approach? It does not seem like a good idea that the rubygems ebuild sets RUBYOPT and subsequent (Ruby Gems related) emerges break without it. Would it not be simpler and more reliable if ebuilds that need it simply execute export RUBYOPT=... prior to running? Why does it have to be in the global environment, forcing it on every user? If there is a requirement for this to be in the global environment, what is the consequence of unsetting RUBYOPT in my own .bashrc (or similar)? Is that safe? Or does that break something that I simply haven't noticed yet? (1) I don't know much about ruby packaging (2) Keeping (1) in mind, I agree with you (3) You're asking the wrong people Try asking on the -dev list, or filing a bug. They'll just close it if it's considered invalid. This bit me once long ago: ruby scripts running from cron don't have their RUBYOPT set, so scripts that normally work magically fail. Since I never set RUBYOPT myself, I didn't expect it to be set. Of course, I just forgot to require rubygems in my script.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-ruby/json-1.8.0
This is what I have. stephen #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 stephen # ls -l /usr/bin/rdoc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jun 6 20:13 /usr/bin/rdoc - rdoc20 stephen # eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby19 (with Rubygems) [2] ruby20 (with Rubygems) * Regards On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 2:20 AM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/07/2014 12:56 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote: On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:47:38 -0700, walt wrote: Is all of the above familiar to you? If not, you may need more help with managing multiple ruby versions. I find it a large PITA and I could use more help myself :) Could you explain what bothers you or where you would need help? Hi Hans. The annoying problems occur when updating ruby-related packages. For example, I (want to) use only ruby19: #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 In spite of that, portage often insists on installing other versions of ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others. AFAICT, the other versions of ruby are dragged in by old ruby packages that were installed before I started using RUBY_TARGETS (because I didn't yet know about RUBY_TARGETS), I discovered all of this by grepping for ruby in /var/db/pkg but it took me a long time to get it sorted out, and I don't expect that a gentoo beginner could do it. (OTOH maybe a gentoo beginner wouldn't care about installing multiple ruby versions :) Thanks for taking the time to read gentoo.user and even more thanks for being a gentoo dev :)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 22:21 -0400, John Covici wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, > Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > pulling ruby21 as follows: > > Calculating dependencies .. . done! > dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: > dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev- > lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev- > lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages > -- any ideas of how to fix? Did you do an emerge @preserved-rebuild? I had the a similar problem but only for a couple of packages (racc and another one), it was quickly fixed that way. But I never had RUBY_TARGETS set so maybe YMMV. raffaele
Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Chris Stankevitz chrisstankev...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, If possible please phrase your response in a way that will make sense to someone who was no idea what is ruby, has no desire to learn what is ruby, and who doesn't [directly] even want ruby on his system. Not knowing what goes in your system or what's blocking it: that's not how gentoo works, sorry. It never was and it never will be. ruby is a programming language, like python, perl, or what not. When several versions of a programming language are available for installing some package, which version to use is controlled by a lang_target_version_number USE flag. These are also conveniently controlled by a LANG_TARGETS variable in make.conf, which specify the versions to install globally. e.g. PYTHON_TARGETS. Portage is complaining that you are trying to install some packages for ruby 1.9, and others for ruby 2.0. True or false: The correct way to appease portage's error message below is to add a bunch of ruby_targets_ruby20 use flags in /etc/portage/package.use The easiest way to get through your use blocks is to force portage to install ruby 2.0 globally instead. RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 in make.conf. Thank you, Chris === The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: (see package.use in the portage(5) man page for more details) # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] =dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by virtual/rubygems-4 # required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[-test,ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,-doc,ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8 # required by sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.103[thin] # required by sys-fs/udisks-1.0.4-r5 # required by x11-libs/libfm-0.1.17-r1[udev] # required by x11-misc/pcmanfm-0.9.10 # required by @selected # required by @world (argument) =dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by virtual/rubygems-4 # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[ruby_targets_ruby19] =dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3 ruby_targets_ruby20 -- This email is:[ ] actionable [x] fyi[ ] social Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate[ ] soon [x] none
Re: [gentoo-user] RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem
On 15 January 2012 18:21, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 01/15/2012 05:24 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, The dev-ruby/rubygems ebuild adds -rauto_gem to the global RUBYOPT. This breaks my own scripts so I have removed it from /etc/env.d. So far, so good. I just tried upgrading dev-ruby/json and it failed because I did not have RUBYOPT set. Obviously, the fix was easy but now I'm wondering ... is this really the best approach? It does not seem like a good idea that the rubygems ebuild sets RUBYOPT and subsequent (Ruby Gems related) emerges break without it. Would it not be simpler and more reliable if ebuilds that need it simply execute export RUBYOPT=... prior to running? Why does it have to be in the global environment, forcing it on every user? If there is a requirement for this to be in the global environment, what is the consequence of unsetting RUBYOPT in my own .bashrc (or similar)? Is that safe? Or does that break something that I simply haven't noticed yet? (1) I don't know much about ruby packaging (2) Keeping (1) in mind, I agree with you Good. Thanks. (3) You're asking the wrong people Try asking on the -dev list, or filing a bug. They'll just close it if it's considered invalid. Yeah, I went back and forth. I figured (hoped?) that gentoo-dev is (more or less) a subset of gentoo-user so I should reach (most of) the devs this way too. Maybe I'm naive. :-) We have too many open bugs already so I'll wait until (hopefully) I see a few more responses before I file a bug. That way there's less chance of an invalid bug and I may save some valuable dev time. This bit me once long ago: ruby scripts running from cron don't have their RUBYOPT set, so scripts that normally work magically fail. Since I never set RUBYOPT myself, I didn't expect it to be set. Of course, I just forgot to require rubygems in my script.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dev-ruby/json-1.8.0
Okay I am now using ruby19, This have solved my problem. Thanks stephen # eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby19 (with Rubygems) * [2] ruby20 (with Rubygems) stephen # ls -l /usr/bin/rdoclrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Jun 8 11:45 /usr/bin/rdoc - rdoc19 stephen # grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:20:22 -0700, walt wrote: On 06/07/2014 12:56 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote: For example, I (want to) use only ruby19: #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 Yes, in hindsight I think that should have been the current default since ruby19 has the best overall coverage for packages. Once ruby20 has caught up I think we'll move to a default of RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 In spite of that, portage often insists on installing other versions of ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others. Partially this was because we tried to solve another issue when ruby20 went stable. I removed those forced use flags for ruby20 last week, so this should no longer happen. We still need to come up with a good plan when the same issue will pop up for ruby21. AFAICT, the other versions of ruby are dragged in by old ruby packages that were installed before I started using RUBY_TARGETS (because I didn't yet know about RUBY_TARGETS), Yes, these will still have other ruby targets recorded and thus also request them for their dependencies. emerge --newuse should be able to help here. I discovered all of this by grepping for ruby in /var/db/pkg but it took me a long time to get it sorted out, and I don't expect that a gentoo beginner could do it. (OTOH maybe a gentoo beginner wouldn't care about installing multiple ruby versions :) We try to keep the default settings so that someone who doesn't care or know about ruby should get a good experience. Moving from ruby18 to ruby19 we did some things that could have been handled better (such as not mentioning that the new ruby must be eselected before making the switch), so hopefully we've learned from those when we do the next update. Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: > > > > I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 > > and the response was > > > > dev-lang/ruby > > selected: 2.1.9 > > protected: none > > omitted: 2.2.6 > > > > Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue > > > >emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 > > > > thanks, > > allan > > > > Yes, that should be fine. I rarely look at portage output and > just run `emerge -uDN @world' and `emerge --depclean' right after > one another, and it always works fine for ruby/python upgrades. > > The devs have done such a good job in general that I haven't had > any problems just running these commands the past couple years. I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages pulling ruby21 as follows: Calculating dependencies .. . done! dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages -- any ideas of how to fix? -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 02:58:31 -0400, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 22:21 -0400, John Covici wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, > > Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > > pulling ruby21 as follows: > > > > Calculating dependencies .. . done! > > dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: > > dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > >dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev- > > lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires > > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > >dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev- > > lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires > > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > > > I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages > > -- any ideas of how to fix? > > Did you do an emerge @preserved-rebuild? I had the a similar problem > but only for a couple of packages (racc and another one), it was > quickly fixed that way. But I never had RUBY_TARGETS set so maybe YMMV. There are no libraries listed for rebuilding, emerge @preserved-rebuild says 0 packages. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:57:39AM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > > pulling ruby21 as follows: > > > > Calculating dependencies .. . done! > > dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: > > dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires > > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires > > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > > > I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages > > -- any ideas of how to fix? > > > > I use the following arguments when I run updates: > --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --changed-use --backtrack=120 > --keep-goingworld > > Do I need to use new-use instead? I'm not sure; I always use new-use. If you haven't synced and updated recently, you may have issues as the default profiles still had ruby-2.1 listed in them. Alec
Re: [gentoo-user] ruby scripts for amarok won't run anymore
Am Dienstag, 17. April 2007 schrieb ext Nistor Andrei: Hi, after an emerge --depclean I noticed none of the ruby scripts work anymore. I get this error: ruby: no such file to load -- auto_gem (LoadError) Does anyone know how this can be fixed? (re-)emerge rubygems. HTH... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111 Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733 GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: www.keyserver.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: finding qt plugins?
On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Roy Wrightr...@wright.org wrote: == Installation $ emerge ruby rubygems $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com Hi, $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com ERROR: could not find gem royw-qt-rebuild locally or in a repository I know nothing about ruby or gems. Any idea what I'm missing? Thanks. I was a little premature in posting the announcement, github takes a while to actually publish the gem. But there is another problem so please wait for my next message before trying again. Thank you, Roy
[gentoo-user] Re: RUBY_TARGETS and eselect ruby
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:25:38 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote: I currently set my RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to: RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 ruby21 World is updated. But ruby21 profile can't be selected with eselect: $ eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles: [1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) * If I remove ruby20 from RUBY_TARGETS, there would be no profiles left. Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is not very useful yet. We should be updating the ruby eselect module in the next week or so. Hans
[gentoo-user] Why I'm unable to run Vagrant as non-root user?
I've installed Vagrant in Gentoo from repository. I'm using Ruby 2.2.8. I've got following error when I was tried run Vagrant as non-root user: pecan@tux ~ $ vagrant /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- checkpoint (LoadError) from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/vagrant-1.9.8/lib/vagrant/environment.rb:7:in `' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/vagrant-1.9.8/bin/vagrant:118:in `' The result of `ruby /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/vagrant-2.0.0/bin/vagrant`: pecan@tux ~ $ ruby /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/vagrant-2.0.0/bin/vagrant /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- log4r (LoadError) from /usr/lib64/ruby/site_ruby/2.2.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require' from /usr/lib64/ruby/gems/2.2.0/gems/vagrant-2.0.0/bin/vagrant:61:in `' The result of `sudo vagrant`: pecan@tux ~ $ sudo vagrant Usage: vagrant [options] [] -v, --version Print the version and exit. -h, --help Print this help. Common commands: box manages boxes: installation, removal, etc. destroy stops and deletes all traces of the vagrant machine global-status outputs status Vagrant environments for this user halt stops the vagrant machine help shows the help for a subcommand init initializes a new Vagrant environment by creating a Vagrantfile login log in to HashiCorp's Vagrant Cloud package packages a running vagrant environment into a box plugin manages plugins: install, uninstall, update, etc. port displays information about guest port mappings powershell connects to machine via powershell remoting provision provisions the vagrant machine push deploys code in this environment to a configured destination rdp connects to machine via RDP reload restarts vagrant machine, loads new Vagrantfile configuration resume resume a suspended vagrant machine snapshot manages snapshots: saving, restoring, etc. ssh connects to machine via SSH ssh-config outputs OpenSSH valid configuration to connect to the machine status outputs status of the vagrant machine suspend suspends the machine up starts and provisions the vagrant environment validate validates the Vagrantfile version prints current and latest Vagrant version For help on any individual command run `vagrant COMMAND -h` Additional subcommands are available, but are either more advanced or not commonly used. To see all subcommands, run the command `vagrant list-commands`. I'm using the system Ruby. As you can see Vagrant with sudo works but I've question why I'm unable to run Vagrant as non-root user? What should I do to be able run Vagrant as non-root user? I'm counting for help.
[gentoo-user] emerge @preserved-rebuild failure
Greetings, Mostly stable Gentoo. After having fun with linguas *g* !!! existing preserved libs found i5-64 /home/hafi # emerge -q @preserved-rebuild emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-lang/ruby:2.1". (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument]) [?] dev-lang/ruby Available versions: (2.2) 2.2.8 2.2.9 (2.3) ~2.3.5 ~2.3.6 (2.4) ~2.4.2 ~2.4.3 (2.5) ~2.5.0 ~2.5.0-r1 hafi@i5-64 ~ $ eselect profile show Current /etc/make.profile symlink: default/linux/amd64/17.0 hafi@i5-64 ~ $ eselect ruby show Current Ruby version: ruby22 Current Rubygems version: gem22 Bug? Hartmut
Re: [gentoo-user] reflexive dependencies?
On 2/4/21 9:24 PM, Matt Connell (Gmail) wrote: On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 20:49 +0100, n952162 wrote: Is this ok? It's stopped my update in its tracks: /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/bundler-2.1.4/temp/environment: line 663: rdoc: command not found Emerging rdoc fails because it tries to emerge bundler... I encountered this as well. I needed to use "eselect ruby" to pick a new ruby profile. Once I selected 2.6 (with Rubygems), I was able to finish the emerge process. That did the trick. Thank you.
Re: [gentoo-user] USE ruby_targets_ruby20
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote: The new ebuild thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8-r1 reflects this. So if you update to this version and don't use FEATURES=test it should not pull in ruby anymore. I don't have FEATURES=test and it still wants to pull all the ruby crap in... Me too. I do not specify FEATURES=test and thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8 still wants dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1: FEATURES=assume-digests binpkg-logs config-protect-if-modified distlocks ebuild-locks fixlafiles merge-sync news parallel-fetch preserve-libs protect-owned sandbox sfperms splitdebug strict unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch userpriv usersandbox usersync =dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 ruby_targets_ruby20 # required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20] # required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc] # required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by virtual/rubygems-4 # required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6[-test,ruby_targets_ruby19] # required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,-doc,ruby_targets_ruby18] # required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247-r1 # required by sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8 Chris
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage. On 22 August 2017 05:21:23 EEST, John Covici <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote: >On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, >Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >> >> >> On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> > >> > I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 >> > and the response was >> > >> > dev-lang/ruby >> > selected: 2.1.9 >> > protected: none >> > omitted: 2.2.6 >> > >> > Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue >> > >> >emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 >> > >> > thanks, >> > allan >> > >> >> Yes, that should be fine. I rarely look at portage output and >> just run `emerge -uDN @world' and `emerge --depclean' right after >> one another, and it always works fine for ruby/python upgrades. >> >> The devs have done such a good job in general that I haven't had >> any problems just running these commands the past couple years. > >I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the >default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages >pulling ruby21 as follows: > >Calculating dependencies .. . done! > dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: > dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > >I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages >-- any ideas of how to fix? > >-- >Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: >How do >you spend it? > > John Covici > cov...@ccs.covici.com In -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:16:55 -0400, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > [1 ] > [2 ] > RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - > newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, > Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage. > > On 22 August 2017 05:21:23 EEST, John Covici <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, > Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > > On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: > > > I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 > and the response was > >dev-lang/ruby > selected: 2.1.9 > protected: none >omitted: 2.2.6 > > Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue > > emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 > > thanks, > allan > > > Yes, that should be fine. I rarely look at portage output and > just run `emerge -uDN @world' and `emerge --depclean' right after > one another, and it always works fine for ruby/python upgrades. > > The devs have done such a good job in general that I haven't had > any problems just running these commands the past couple years. > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > pulling ruby21 as follows: > > Calculating dependencies .. . done! > dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: > dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires > dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 > > I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages > -- any ideas of how to fix? > I use the following arguments when I run updates: --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --changed-use --backtrack=120 --keep-goingworld Do I need to use new-use instead? -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com
[gentoo-user] Ruby problems
Hello list, Has anyone here succeeded in building a new system since the recent Ruby language upgrade? I keep being thwarted by failure such as this typical one: >>> Install dev-ruby/rake-13.0.3-r1 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/ rake-13.0.3-r1/image * Running install phase for ruby26 ... * Running install phase for ruby27 ... Traceback (most recent call last): 3: from :1:in `' 2: from :1:in `require' 1: from /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `' /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/compatibility (LoadError) * ERROR: dev-ruby/rake-13.0.3-r1::gentoo failed (install phase): * Unable to generate gemspec file. Similar failures occur whatever profile I use (of the suitable ones), and no matter whether I set amd64 or ~amd64 in make.conf. It's possible that I had some unhelpful USE flags set, I suppose, but I did try to minimise them. In the end I went back to a month-old backup and updated that instead. -- Regards, Peter.
[gentoo-user] ruby problem preventing my world update
Hi. In trying to do my world update today, I have run into some kind of ruby problem. When doing the update portage had me add changes, seems mostly to do with add ruby 3.0 as a ruby_target. Now, I get the following at the end of my world update log >>> Emerging (57 of 237) dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1::gentoo * racc-1.5.2.tar.gz BLAKE2B SHA512 size ;-) ... [ ok ] >>> Unpacking source... * Running unpack phase for all ... >>> Unpacking racc-1.5.2.tar.gz to >>> /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/work/all >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/work >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/work ... * Running prepare phase for all ... * Running prepare phase for all ... Traceback (most recent call last): 3: from :2:in `' 2: from :2:in `require' 1: from /usr/lib64/ruby/2.5.0/rubygems.rb:17:in `' /usr/lib64/ruby/2.5.0/rubygems.rb:17:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/compatibility (LoadError) * ERROR: dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1::gentoo failed (prepare phase): * (no error message) * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 125: Called src_prepare * environment, line 2205: Called ruby-ng_src_prepare * environment, line 1861: Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'all' '_ruby_apply_patches' * environment, line 717: Called _ruby_apply_patches * environment, line 552: Called all_ruby_prepare * environment, line 817: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * rake lib/racc/parser-text.rb || die; * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1::gentoo'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1::gentoo'`. * The complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.5.2-r1:20210214-164845.log'. * For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/temp/environment'. * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/work/all/racc-1.5.2' * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1/work/all/racc-1.5.2' >>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1, Log file: >>> '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.5.2-r1:20210214-164845.log' *** Resuming merge... These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies . done! * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies: * * >=dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3[ruby_targets_ruby25] pulled in by: * (dev-lang/ruby-2.5.8-r1:2.5/2.5::gentoo, installed) * * >=dev-ruby/bundler-2.1.4[ruby_targets_ruby30] pulled in by: * (dev-lang/ruby-3.0.0-r1:3.0/3.0::gentoo, installed) * * virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by: * (dev-ruby/bundler-2.2.4:2/2::gentoo, installed) * * virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by: * (dev-ruby/did_you_mean-1.2.1:2.5/2.5::gentoo, installed) * * virtual/ruby-ssl[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by: * (dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2:0/0::gentoo, installed) * * virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby25(-)] pulled in by: * (dev-ruby/rdoc-6.3.0:0/0::gentoo, installed) * * The resume list contains packages that are either masked or have * unsatisfied dependencies. Please restart/continue the operation * manually, or use --skipfirst to skip the first package in the list and * any other packages that may be masked or have missing dependencies. * * The following package has failed to build, install, or execute postinst: * * (dev-ruby/racc-1.5.2-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge), Log file: * '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.5.2-r1:20210214-164845.log' I tried to emerge dev-ruby/racc, after re-installing dev-ruby/rubygens, but no joy. How can I proceed? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una cov...@ccs.covici.com
Re: [gentoo-user] Jekyll on Gentoo using containers
On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 11:51 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Can you point me to that file (privately if you prefer)? I've had a look > around > and it doesn't reveal itself. https://github.com/gentoo-ev/www.gentoo.de/blob/master/Dockerfile > > > It builds a static site so you can open the resulting HTML right in > > your browser without setting up a whole ass web server. > > That's the attraction of Jekyll. The snag is that I can't install a Jekyll > theme without giving myself wholesale privileges over the Gentoo installation > of Ruby. After you've installed jekyll, you should have rubygems available on your system. Running gem install will install to your /.local/share/gem/ruby directory and make it available to whatever version of ruby you ran the command with. I tried it with "jekyll-theme-minimal" and it looks like it worked, but I didn't go so far as to build a website with it.
Re: [gentoo-user] Jekyll on Gentoo using containers
On Wednesday, 30 August 2023 14:59:17 BST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 11:51 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Can you point me to that file (privately if you prefer)? I've had a look > > around and it doesn't reveal itself. > > https://github.com/gentoo-ev/www.gentoo.de/blob/master/Dockerfile Ah. I'd never have found that - thanks! ...>8 > After you've installed jekyll, you should have rubygems available on > your system. Running > > gem install > > will install to your /.local/share/gem/ruby directory and make > it available to whatever version of ruby you ran the command with. I > tried it with "jekyll-theme-minimal" and it looks like it worked, but I > didn't go so far as to build a website with it. That does indeed seem to work - thanks again! I've had to interpret a few things I'd found on the Web, including a .bashrc snippet to include the gems directory in my $PATH; I've set it like this: export GEM_HOME="$HOME/.local/share/gem/ruby" export PATH="$HOME/.local/share/gem/ruby/bin:$PATH" Now for the spade-work! -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Jekyll on Gentoo using containers
I remember replying to this, but I can't find the reply anywhere. Did it get to the list? On Wednesday, 30 August 2023 14:59:17 BST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 11:51 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Can you point me to that file (privately if you prefer)? I've had a look > > around and it doesn't reveal itself. > > https://github.com/gentoo-ev/www.gentoo.de/blob/master/Dockerfile > > > > It builds a static site so you can open the resulting HTML right in > > > your browser without setting up a whole ass web server. > > > > That's the attraction of Jekyll. The snag is that I can't install a Jekyll > > theme without giving myself wholesale privileges over the Gentoo > > installation of Ruby. > > After you've installed jekyll, you should have rubygems available on > your system. Running > > gem install > > will install to your /.local/share/gem/ruby directory and make > it available to whatever version of ruby you ran the command with. I > tried it with "jekyll-theme-minimal" and it looks like it worked, but I > didn't go so far as to build a website with it. -- Regards, Peter.
[gentoo-user] Error when emerging ruby
Hi! I have the following problem when I try to emerge ruby. The build fails with: - i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libruby18.so.1.8 array.o bignum.o class.o compar.o dir.o dln.o enum.o error.o eval.o file.o gc.o hash.o inits.o io.o marshal.o math.o numeric.o object.o pack.o parse.o process.o prec.o random.o range.o re.o regex.o ruby.o signal.o sprintf.o st.o string.o struct.o time.o util.o variable.o version.o dmyext.o -ldl -lcrypt -lm -o libruby18.so.1.8.2 ./miniruby: No such file to load -- ubygems (LoadError) make: *** [rbconfig.rb] Fehler 1 make: *** Warte auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse... ./miniruby: No such file to load -- ubygems (LoadError) make: *** Warte auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse... - I have no clue why he prints out the line ./miniruby: No such file to load -- ubygems (LoadError) Obviously this has something to do with the rubygems (the above is no type error - the r is missing!) which I had installed some time ago but did unmerge... Any ideas? Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: finding qt plugins?
On Jun 30, 2009, at 4:41 PM, Roy Wright wrote: On Jun 30, 2009, at 3:16 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Roy Wrightr...@wright.org wrote: == Installation $ emerge ruby rubygems $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com Hi, $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com ERROR: could not find gem royw-qt-rebuild locally or in a repository I know nothing about ruby or gems. Any idea what I'm missing? Thanks. I was a little premature in posting the announcement, github takes a while to actually publish the gem. But there is another problem so please wait for my next message before trying again. Thank you, Roy OK, it's verified and ready now. Please try again. Thank you, Roy
[gentoo-user] Re: RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:21:30 -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 15 January 2012 18:21, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 01/15/2012 05:24 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: Hi all, The dev-ruby/rubygems ebuild adds -rauto_gem to the global RUBYOPT. This breaks my own scripts so I have removed it from /etc/env.d. So far, so good. Try asking on the -dev list, or filing a bug. They'll just close it if it's considered invalid. Agree, if things are broken then please file a bug. We have too many open bugs already so I'll wait until (hopefully) I see a few more responses before I file a bug. That way there's less chance of an invalid bug and I may save some valuable dev time. If you want to help us then open a bug so there can be a focused discussion, especially if things are broken. If you really want to help us then participate in the bugs and help us close them :-) Kind regards, Hans
[gentoo-user] Re: RUBY_TARGETS and eselect ruby
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:32:03 +, Svoop wrote: Hans de Graaff graaff at gentoo.org writes: Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is not very useful yet. We should be updating the ruby eselect module in the next week or so. Any news on this? Like Pavel the only related packages are rubygems, rake and friends since it's a pretty minimalistic box serving a Rails app which we are lifting to Ruby 2.1 next week. Support for ruby21 in eselect would be great, thanks a bunch! eselect-ruby-20131227 has support for eselecting ruby21. It has been around since Jan 4th. Progress on ruby21 marking of packages has been slow but steady. Hans
Re: [gentoo-user] Brother Printer
On Friday, 09. Dec 2016, 11:16:18 +0100, siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 22:02:51 +0100 > Bertram Scharpf <li...@bertram-scharpf.de> wrote: > > > I have a Brother MFC 7420. Yet, it's not connected to my > > Gentoo but to a FreeBSD box. There, I completely ignored the > > recommended drivers. I configured lpd (/etc/printcap) to > > first pipe the PostScript/PDF documents through a > > Ghostscript command. > > > > Then I wrap around this a simple self-written PJL frame. > > > > You can have my PJL generator if you want (It's in Ruby). > > Yes thanks if you like to share. Say something like $ sudo gem install pjl or first examine it on <https://github.com/BertramScharpf/ruby-pjl>. There's a small dependency on a gem "appl" that's also available on RubyGems and on my Github page. However, to the present day I did not manage to make the scanner work on FreeBSD. I plug it into a Linux machine before I scan. Bertram -- Bertram Scharpf Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?
On 12/20/18 10:25 AM, YUE Daian wrote: Did anyone ever considered using GitLab? Its community edition is quiet enough I think. Yes, but there's a small problem: we would need to run our own instance of Gitlab to prevent some of the same problems that exist with Github (like losing all of our data if they go out of business). The "run your own" version of Gitlab is a bit of a nightmare, being built with Ruby on Rails. It has a million dependencies, many of which are hard to package because rubygems/bundler are awful and encourage worst practices. Gitlab upstream expects you to run a version that bundles everything it uses. What's the security strategy for something with a million bundled libraries? There is none, which makes following their advice pretty irresponsible, too. For all its flaws, BugZilla is pretty stable software that uses stable libraries in an ecosystem inhabited by adults. Our infra team are all volunteers, too -- so we need an alternative that isn't way more work for them to run.
[gentoo-user] rubygems-1.9.1 error
I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight. The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages and then portage chose what to merge afresh. All good to go I thought until this was error showed up: == Emerging (1 of 9) dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 * rake-0.9.6.gem SHA256 SHA512 WHIRLPOOL size ;-) ... [ ok ] Unpacking source... * Running unpack phase for all ... * Unpacking .gem file... ... [ ok ] * Uncompressing metadata ... [ ok ] * Unpacking data.tar.gz ... [ ok ] Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6/work Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6/work ... * Running prepare phase for all ... gzip: doc/rake.1.gz: unexpected end of file * Running source copy phase for ruby19 ... * Running source copy phase for ruby20 ... * Running prepare phase for ruby19 ... * Running prepare phase for ruby20 ... Source prepared. Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6/work ... Source configured. Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6/work ... * Running compile phase for all ... Source compiled. Test phase [not enabled]: dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 Install rake-0.9.6 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6/image/ category dev-ruby * Running install phase for ruby19 ... /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults (LoadError) from /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:30:in `top (required)' from internal:gem_prelude:1:in `require' from internal:gem_prelude:1:in `compiled' * ERROR: dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6::gentoo failed (install phase): * Unable to generate gemspec file. * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 93: Called src_install * environment, line 4316: Called ruby-ng_src_install * environment, line 3978: Called _ruby_each_implementation 'each_ruby_install' * environment, line 449: Called _ruby_invoke_environment 'ruby19' 'each_ruby_install' * environment, line 501: Called each_ruby_install * environment, line 802: Called each_fakegem_install * environment, line 775: Called ruby_fakegem_install_gemspec * environment, line 4159: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * fi ) || die Unable to generate gemspec file.; == The missing file is there, I think: # ls -la /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 34951 Apr 20 2012 /usr/lib64/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb What now? -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22
John Covici wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:16:55 -0400, > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> [1 ] >> [2 ] >> RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - >> newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, >> Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage. >> >> On 22 August 2017 05:21:23 EEST, John Covici <cov...@ccs.covici.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, >> Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: >> >> >> >> On 08/21/2017 10:13 AM, allan gottlieb wrote: >> >> >> I issued emerge --pretend --verbose --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 >> and the response was >> >>dev-lang/ruby >> selected: 2.1.9 >> protected: none >>omitted: 2.2.6 >> >> Am I correct in believing it is now safe to issue >> >> emerge --depclean =ruby-2.1.9 >> >> thanks, >> allan >> >> >> Yes, that should be fine. I rarely look at portage output and >> just run `emerge -uDN @world' and `emerge --depclean' right after >> one another, and it always works fine for ruby/python upgrades. >> >> The devs have done such a good job in general that I haven't had >> any problems just running these commands the past couple years. >> >> I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the >> default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages >> pulling ruby21 as follows: >> >> Calculating dependencies .. . done! >> dev-lang/ruby-2.1.10 pulled in by: >> dev-ruby/hoe-3.13.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/json-1.8.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/json-2.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/kpeg-1.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/maruku-0.7.3 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/minitest-5.10.3 requires >> dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.1.1-r1 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/power_assert-1.0.2 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/racc-1.4.14 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/rake-12.0.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/rdoc-5.1.0 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/rubygems-2.6.12 requires >> dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/test-unit-3.2.5 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> dev-ruby/yard-0.9.8 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> virtual/rubygems-13 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> virtual/rubygems-7 requires dev-lang/ruby:2.1 >> >> I tried a word ld update, but it didn't update any of those packages >> -- any ideas of how to fix? >> > I use the following arguments when I run updates: > --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --changed-use --backtrack=120 > --keep-goingworld > > Do I need to use new-use instead? > Over the years, I've updated my update process to what causes the least issues, for me at least. This is what I type in: eix-sync && emerge -uaDN world This is the settings I have in make.conf: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps y --backtrack=100 --keep-going -v -j8 --quiet-build=n -1 --unordered-display" Obviously some may need to be set differently, like the -j8 part, for your system but some of that helps no matter what system you use. The -1 for example keeps the world file clean since you have to put effort into adding something to it. One could add it to the world file directly or use the --select y option. Either way, nothing gets added to the world file because you forgot to use the -1 option. The backtrack, so far 100 has worked. If I start to have issues that a higher number fixes, it will be upped to that number. Over time, some things have been removed since they were no longer needed. Your mileage may vary but could give you a good starting point. Took me years to get to that simple line. ;-) If anyone is interested, I could post some other things from make.conf I've picked up over the years. Hope that helps. Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] How to find which .keep file creation is failing
On Friday, 25 August 2023 14:51:34 BST I wrote: > I'm now in a hole, as I can't "use a newer Ruby version instead." I tried yanking and recompiling the docbook package, and that removed its dependency on ruby30. Then webkit-gkt with: $ grep -ir ruby /etc/portage /etc/portage/make.conf:RUBY_TARGETS="ruby31 ruby32" Returned the same dependencies, every one of which (other than webkit-gtk) is conditional or version-unspecific, unless my eyes are deceiving me: $ equery d dev-lang/ruby:3.0 * These packages depend on dev-lang/ruby: app-text/docbook-xsl-ns-stylesheets-1.79.1 (ruby ? dev-lang/ruby) dev-ruby/bundler-2.4.15 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/date-3.3.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/debug-1.7.2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/did_you_mean-1.6.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/forwardable-1.3.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/json-2.6.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/kpeg-1.3.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/matrix-0.4.2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/minitest-5.19.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/net-ftp-0.2.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/net-imap-0.3.7 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/net-pop-0.1.2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/net-protocol-0.2.1 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/net-smtp-0.3.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/power_assert-2.0.3 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/prime-0.1.2-r1 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/psych-5.1.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/racc-1.7.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/rake-13.0.6-r2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/rdoc-6.5.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/rexml-3.2.6 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/rss-0.3.0 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/rubygems-3.4.15 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/singleton-0.1.1 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/stringio-3.0.8 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/test-unit-3.6.1 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/time-0.2.2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/timeout-0.3.2 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) dev-ruby/typeprof-0.21.7 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.40.5-r600 (dev-lang/ruby:3.0) virtual/ruby-ssl-13 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0[ssl]) virtual/rubygems-18 (ruby_targets_ruby30 ? dev-lang/ruby:3.0) Now what? I can't do without webkit-gtk. -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby problems
On 2021-04-20 15:40+0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: > Hello list, > > Has anyone here succeeded in building a new system since the recent > Ruby language upgrade? I keep being thwarted by failure such as this > typical one: > > >>> Install dev-ruby/rake-13.0.3-r1 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/ > rake-13.0.3-r1/image > * Running install phase for ruby26 ... > * Running install phase for ruby27 ... > Traceback (most recent call last): > 3: from :1:in `' > 2: from :1:in `require' > 1: from /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in ` (required)>' /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `require': > cannot load such file -- rubygems/compatibility (LoadError) > * ERROR: dev-ruby/rake-13.0.3-r1::gentoo failed (install phase): > * Unable to generate gemspec file. > > Similar failures occur whatever profile I use (of the suitable ones), > and no matter whether I set amd64 or ~amd64 in make.conf. > > It's possible that I had some unhelpful USE flags set, I suppose, but > I did try to minimise them. > > In the end I went back to a month-old backup and updated that instead. > That looks like you need to select the new ruby version with eselect. It doesn't figure out the right version automatically, like python. See also: <https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/message/e7203a5fe084ab6f35351a814de3f6db>. -- Get my PGP key with `gpg --locate-keys tasty...@tastytea.de` or at <https://tastytea.de/tastytea.asc>. pgpNPktoXhXis.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't install a new system
On Thursday, 8 April 2021 16:47:05 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:27:51 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Untarring the latest stage-3 onto /mnt/gentoo, /mnt/gentoo/var and /mnt/ > > gentoo/usr/local gets me started. Then I chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash, > > and that works too. Then I leave the profile at the default vanilla > > amd64 and emerge-webrsync. So far so good. Then when I try emerge > > -uaDvN @world I get a circular dependency involving elt-patches and > > xz-utils. No amount of unsetting of USE flags makes any difference. Nor > > does --excluding one of them, because portage just refuses to do that. > > Try omitting -D and -N to reduce the number of packages being rebuilt. If > that doesn't help, post the output here. I think I must have had a bad stage tarball. At any rate, that problem doesn't occur now. Instead I get various ruby packages failing because they can't find the gems directory, or some other problem. There was once a news item about ruby-30, but I don't see it any more. At the time I added this: # cat /etc/portage/package.use/ruby dev-ruby/* ruby_targets_ruby30 virtual/rubygemsruby_targets_ruby30 virtual/ruby-sslruby_targets_ruby30 That worked nicely, but not on a new system. I've tried changing the 20 to 27 and I've tried removing the file, but neither helps. Eselecting ruby versions doesn't either. -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't install a new system
On Sunday, 11 April 2021 11:33:22 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday, 8 April 2021 16:47:05 BST Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:27:51 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > > Untarring the latest stage-3 onto /mnt/gentoo, /mnt/gentoo/var and /mnt/ > > > gentoo/usr/local gets me started. Then I chroot /mnt/gentoo /bin/bash, > > > and that works too. Then I leave the profile at the default vanilla > > > amd64 and emerge-webrsync. So far so good. Then when I try emerge > > > -uaDvN @world I get a circular dependency involving elt-patches and > > > xz-utils. No amount of unsetting of USE flags makes any difference. Nor > > > does --excluding one of them, because portage just refuses to do that. > > > > Try omitting -D and -N to reduce the number of packages being rebuilt. If > > that doesn't help, post the output here. > > I think I must have had a bad stage tarball. At any rate, that problem > doesn't occur now. Instead I get various ruby packages failing because they > can't find the gems directory, or some other problem. > > There was once a news item about ruby-30, but I don't see it any more. At > the time I added this: > > # cat /etc/portage/package.use/ruby > dev-ruby/* ruby_targets_ruby30 > virtual/rubygemsruby_targets_ruby30 > virtual/ruby-sslruby_targets_ruby30 > > That worked nicely, but not on a new system. I've tried changing the 20 to > 27 and I've tried removing the file, but neither helps. Eselecting ruby > versions doesn't either. Typo: 30, not 20. -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby Rails and Rake - strange error on Gentoo...
I have the exact same issue and as yet have been unable to solve it. My emerged versions are as follows: dev-lang/ruby-1.8.3 * dev-ruby/rubygems-0.8.11 * dev-ruby/activerecord-1.11.1 dev-ruby/activesupport-1.1.1-r2 * dev-ruby/rake-0.5.3 * dev-ruby/rails-0.13.1 * My error when running rake: /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:658:in `private': undefined method `have_option?' for class `Object' (NameError) from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:658 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:657 from /usr/bin/rake:3 If I find a solution I will post it.On 11/7/05, Steve [Gentoo] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've recently started playing around with Ruby and rails under Gentoo.I've installed everything using emerge as opposed to the using ruby gems. While I seem to be able to use my rails application, I get a puzzlingerror message when I try to verify it using the default generatedrakefile and rake:--$ rails myapp$ cd myapp$ rake /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:658:in `private': undefined method`have_option?' for class `Object' (NameError)from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:658from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rake.rb:657 from /usr/bin/rake:3--I would not expect this error message. I get the same error message ifI've introduced controllers and views (as suggested in the tutorials)before running make.I've asked on both the ruby and rails mailing lists without any suggestions arising... it seems this might be peculiarto Gentoo.Do other users (more familiar than I am with Ruby, rails andrake)have the same problems?Is this a problem with my generated application, Rails - or (as the error message suggests) an error in theimplementation of rake?--gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: finding qt plugins?
On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:56 AM, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: revdep-rebuild only resolves link-time errors, not runtime errors. You need to observe yourself if something is broken and then rebuild it manually; revdep-rebuild ain't gonna help in this case. Sounds like Gentoo needs a new tool. Calling all geeks and nerds !! Dale Drum roll please... http://github.com/royw/qt-rebuild A couple of notes: * if you run qt-rebuild --pretend, you should have only one build key. if you have more than one, you really need to rebuild them. * the build key does not contain the qt version. Instead it describes the build environment. So currently I don't see how to verify that all the plugins are built to the same qt API. Here's the readme: = qt-rebuild This is a utility for gentoo (http://gentoo.org) linux. When QT is upgraded, you may have to rebuild any QT plugins. This utility attempts to find and rebuild packages with QT plugins. Here's the discussion thread: http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/msg_d9357c6f26dec67492b794f8f66db29d.xml == Installation $ emerge ruby rubygems $ sudo gem install royw-qt-rebuild --source http://gems.github.com == Usage $ qt-rebuild -h OPTIONS --version,-v This version of qt-rebuild --help,-h Print usage. --quiet,-q Display error messages only. --debug,-d Display debug messages. --set,-s Output in portage's set format. --nocolor,-C Turn off colored output. (This option is also passed to portage.) --pretend,-p Do a dry-run. It is recommended to do a dry run first: $ qt-rebuild -p To create a set file: $ qt-rebuild -s -p /etc/portage/sets/qt-rebuild == Copyright Copyright (c) 2009 Roy Wright. See LICENSE for details. ---
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Understanding new ruby dependencies
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org wrote: Yes, this is true. We do this because normally ruby contains a copy of rdoc. We unbundle that and thus the external rdoc implementation is installed. Hans, Thank you, I understand. Apparently I have to add some ruby_targets_ruby19 USE flags to my system. I pasted a snippet of my /etc/portage/package.use below. I included some other entries for context. Question 1: Is it true that, except for this new RUBY stuff, every entry in my package.use file is an attempt by me to enable some feature I want in a package I want? Answer 1: Yes Question 2: Does it seem weird that portage wants me to add USE flags to enable some feature in a package I never heard of and have no interest in and to top it off has a very weird name (ruby_targets_ruby19)? Answer 2: [your answer here] The tone of this message might sound obnoxious, but it's just a trick I am using to better ask my question. I'm not complaining (I don't even know enough about this to have a complaint), I'm really just curious. Thank you, Chris === From /etc/portage/package.use: # Give a GUI to cmake dev-util/cmake qt4 # Enable git-svn, gitk, and git bash completion dev-vcs/git tk bash-completion subversion dev-vcs/subversion -dso perl # Enable nice mounts in gnome gnome-base/gvfs fuse # Enable plotting in octave sci-mathematics/octave gnuplot # Satisfy Gentoo's desire to have RUBY and rdoc installed dev-ruby/rubygems ruby_targets_ruby19 dev-ruby/rake ruby_targets_ruby19 dev-ruby/racc ruby_targets_ruby19 dev-ruby/rdoc ruby_targets_ruby19 dev-ruby/json ruby_targets_ruby19
[gentoo-user] Re: dev-ruby/json-1.8.0
On 06/07/2014 12:56 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote: On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:47:38 -0700, walt wrote: Is all of the above familiar to you? If not, you may need more help with managing multiple ruby versions. I find it a large PITA and I could use more help myself :) Could you explain what bothers you or where you would need help? Hi Hans. The annoying problems occur when updating ruby-related packages. For example, I (want to) use only ruby19: #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 In spite of that, portage often insists on installing other versions of ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others. AFAICT, the other versions of ruby are dragged in by old ruby packages that were installed before I started using RUBY_TARGETS (because I didn't yet know about RUBY_TARGETS), I discovered all of this by grepping for ruby in /var/db/pkg but it took me a long time to get it sorted out, and I don't expect that a gentoo beginner could do it. (OTOH maybe a gentoo beginner wouldn't care about installing multiple ruby versions :) Thanks for taking the time to read gentoo.user and even more thanks for being a gentoo dev :)
[gentoo-user] Re: dev-ruby/json-1.8.0
On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:20:22 -0700, walt wrote: On 06/07/2014 12:56 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote: For example, I (want to) use only ruby19: #grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19 Yes, in hindsight I think that should have been the current default since ruby19 has the best overall coverage for packages. Once ruby20 has caught up I think we'll move to a default of RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 In spite of that, portage often insists on installing other versions of ruby, rdoc, rubygems, and you already know the others. Partially this was because we tried to solve another issue when ruby20 went stable. I removed those forced use flags for ruby20 last week, so this should no longer happen. We still need to come up with a good plan when the same issue will pop up for ruby21. AFAICT, the other versions of ruby are dragged in by old ruby packages that were installed before I started using RUBY_TARGETS (because I didn't yet know about RUBY_TARGETS), Yes, these will still have other ruby targets recorded and thus also request them for their dependencies. emerge --newuse should be able to help here. I discovered all of this by grepping for ruby in /var/db/pkg but it took me a long time to get it sorted out, and I don't expect that a gentoo beginner could do it. (OTOH maybe a gentoo beginner wouldn't care about installing multiple ruby versions :) We try to keep the default settings so that someone who doesn't care or know about ruby should get a good experience. Moving from ruby18 to ruby19 we did some things that could have been handled better (such as not mentioning that the new ruby must be eselected before making the switch), so hopefully we've learned from those when we do the next update. Hans
[gentoo-user] Re: post build files
Alec Ten Harmsel alec at alectenharmsel.com writes: Lastly, if you throw this in a publicly-accessible git repo I'll try and help, even though I took a look at mesos and it seems like it'll be hard because they bundle libraries with it and have made a couple other (imnho) bad decisions. I biggest obstacle for all of the Apache clustering sofwares I want to try, is java and other codes seem to be central to their offerings. For example maven is becoming critical for many codes [1]. In fact we are loosing jruby because nobody has the requisite skills? [2]. Hacking and slashing through ebuilds is not difficult. I just have inate tendencies to that cause me to believe the path should be 'well worn with ample examples; but alas I do not think that is the gentoo way, particular with how fast things are moving on new codes and the entire linux echo_systems. Why not champion maven and jruby so many can benefit? Can maven be built from sources, as I see it is currently in binary form maven-bin ? Maven is an obstacle that I'm not certain I can go around if I am to continue down the apache cluster pathway.. snip-dev # Mask jruby 1.6.x for removal in 30 days. # on ruby 1.8. Many packages are no longer compatible with its # syntax, and security support for ruby 1.8 has stopped. This # incompatibility now has reached central packages like rubygems so we # have decided to remove jruby 1.6 now. jruby upstream has released # the 1.7.x series some time ago, but unfortunately we only have a # masked version that has too many issues to unmask. Please let us # know if you know java and ruby and want to help out here: hth, James [1] http://maven.apache.org/ [2] http://moving-innovations.com/blog/2014/04/23/the-precarious-state-of-jruby-in-gentoo
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is it that hard to add a package, or am I doing wrong?
On 2018-12-20 10:42, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 12/20/18 10:25 AM, YUE Daian wrote: >> >> Did anyone ever considered using GitLab? >> Its community edition is quiet enough I think. >> > > Yes, but there's a small problem: we would need to run our own instance > of Gitlab to prevent some of the same problems that exist with Github > (like losing all of our data if they go out of business). > > The "run your own" version of Gitlab is a bit of a nightmare, being > built with Ruby on Rails. It has a million dependencies, many of which > are hard to package because rubygems/bundler are awful and encourage > worst practices. Gitlab upstream expects you to run a version that > bundles everything it uses. > > What's the security strategy for something with a million bundled > libraries? There is none, which makes following their advice pretty > irresponsible, too. > > For all its flaws, BugZilla is pretty stable software that uses stable > libraries in an ecosystem inhabited by adults. Our infra team are all > volunteers, too -- so we need an alternative that isn't way more work > for them to run. That sounds reasonable... I did not notice that "run your own" version of GitLab has so many security issues. I have only configured it in an intranet. I am just concerned that the current gap between official announcement and reality is not good for maintenance of packages.
[gentoo-user] useflag hell.
ete semantic-desktop
server sftp sip smp soprano sql sqlite sse2 sse3 sse4 static-ppds
subversion system-boost system-icu system-jpeg system-libvpx
system-sqlite t1lib theora threads threadsafe threadsonly tinfo tk
unlock-notify upnp upnp-av userlocales utempter uuid uvm uxa v4l vcd
video videos vnc vpx wayland webkit xine xmp xvfb xvmc yuv4mpeg zeroconf
-bluetooth -bundled-libs -dso -examples -libav -odbc -samba -vlc"
CPU_FLAGS_X86="mmx mmxext sse2_4way 3dnow 3dnowext sse sse2 sse3 sse4"
GRUB_PLATFORMS="pc efi-64"
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--jobs=1 --quiet-build=n --verbose"
FEATURES="sandbox distlocks nostrip parallel-fetch userfetch userpriv
usersandbox splitdebug -preserve-libs"
PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS="--progress"
VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia radeonsi radeon amdgpu"
source /var/lib/layman/make.conf
# portage complains if absent.
#RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby21 ruby22 ruby24"
RUBY_TARGETS="${RUBY_TARGETS} ruby23 ruby24"
USE_PYTHON='2.7 3.5'
PYTHON_TARGETS="${PYTHON_TARGETS} python2_7 python3_5 python3_4"
PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4"
ABI_X86="64 32"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://gentoo.mirrors.pair.com/;
# Really and truly unusable...
sys-libs/pam -debug
app-editors/nano -debug
#required by seamonkey install
dev-cpp/clucene -debug
# causes undefined symbol errors.
net-libs/webkit-gtk -debug -gles2
# net-misc/curl -threads
net-libs/xulrunner -debug
#>=sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.8 -zlib
dev-db/mysql -debug
#really not compatible!
dev-libs/klibc -custom-cflags
#stupid missfeature; buggy as fuck too.
media-video/mplayer -joystick
#BOINC compatibility.
net-misc/curl -gnutls
# requires dead libraries:
dev-libs/libusb -doc
media-libs/fontconfig -doc
media-sound/esound -doc
dev-java/oracle-jdk-bin doc
# kinda strange, demanded by e-build.
>=dev-libs/elfutils-0.154-r1 static-libs
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247[rdoc]
# required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20]
>=dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247[rdoc]
# required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19]
# required by virtual/rubygems-6
# required by dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6
# required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,-doc,ruby_targets_ruby20]
>=dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby20]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247[rdoc]
# required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20]
>=dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247
# required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20]
# required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc]
# required by dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3[ruby_targets_ruby19]
# required by virtual/rubygems-6
# required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[-test,ruby_targets_ruby20]
>=dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p247
# required by dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9[ruby_targets_ruby20]
# required by dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1[ruby_targets_ruby18]
# required by dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p448[rdoc]
# required by dev-ruby/json-1.8.0[ruby_targets_ruby19]
>=dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3 ruby_targets_ruby20
# required by app-emulation/wine-1.7.4[abi_x86_32,opencl]
# required by @selected
# required by @world (argument)
>=virtual/opencl-0-r4 abi_x86_32
>=dev-util/cucumber-1.3.2 -test -{test}
>=dev-ruby/hoe-2.13.0 -test -{test}
# Attempt to work around CPU hogging issue, seems more related to saving.
>=app-office/texmacs-1 -qt4
#bug work-around.
>=dev-util/cmake-2 -ncurses
>=net-im/pidgin-2 -ncurses
>=app-emulation/wine-1.7.15 -custom-cflags
=dev-games/mygui-3.2.1 -opengl
>=media-libs/mesa-1 -opencl
=net-dns/avahi-0.6.31-r7 -gtk -gtk3
>=app-crypt/heimdal-1.5.3-r2 -ssl -threads
>=dev-games/ogre-1.9.0-r1 -double-precision
>=kde-apps/kde4-l10n-15.12.1-r1 minimal
>=media-libs/opencv-3.1.0-r1 -qt4
>=app-crypt/pinentry-0.9.7 -qt4
>=media-libs/mlt-0.9.8-r2 -qt4
>=dev-qt/qtwebkit-4.8.7:4 -exceptions
>=dev-qt/qtgui-5.5.1-r1 -egl
Re: [gentoo-user] Circular dependencies...
Khumba b...@khumba.net [14-01-06 08:32]:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:18:20 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I got this:
# emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
RUBY_TARGETS=(ruby20)
[nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8,
1.9.3_p484:1.9] USE=berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug
-examples -rubytests -socks5 -tk (-xemacs)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ]dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
(-ree18%)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 [1.4.8] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 107 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 146 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
(-ree18%) 121 kB
[ebuild U ]dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) 457 kB
Total: 4 packages (4 upgrades), Size of downloads: 830 kB
* Error: circular dependencies:
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
(dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
It might be possible to break this cycle
by applying the following change:
- dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 (Change USE: -doc)
I added this to /etc/portage/package.use:
=dev-ruby/racc-1.49 -doc
1.49 != 1.4.9, is that not just a typo in your email?
Cheers,
Khumba
and have set doc in the USE flags in make.conf.
I am still getting the above output...
How can I get out of this cycle out of this cycle out of this cycles
out of... ;)
Best regards,
mcc
Hi Khumba,
oh damn...I didn't saw that! Thank you very much !!!
Now the circle is moved a little further...I got:
[nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
RUBY_TARGETS=(ruby20)
[nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8, 1.9.3_p484:1.9]
USE=berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug -examples -rubytests
-socks5 -tk (-xemacs)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ]dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 [1.4.8] USE=-doc* {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 107 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 146 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
121 kB
[ebuild U ]dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) 457 kB
Total: 4 packages (4 upgrades), Size of downloads: 830 kB
* Error: circular dependencies:
(dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
(dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
(dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
It might be possible to break this cycle
by applying the following change:
- dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 (Change USE: -doc)
I will now add that to package.use and will see how far it will
take...
Thanks a lot again! :)
Cheers,
mcc
Re: [gentoo-user] Can't install a new system
On Monday, 12 April 2021 12:01:28 BST Peter Humphrey wrote: > Okay, step by step. First I chose the basic make.profile, number 1, and > installed my base system set - everything that doesn't need a GUI. Then I > switched to the basic desktop profile, number 5 and ran a -uav @world. So > far so good, but then I attempted to install a basic set of GUI packages - > everything but a DE. The command was 'emerge -uav @xorg'. I got this: > > --->8 > > >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work ... > > * Running prepare phase for all ... > * Running prepare phase for all ... > * Running source copy phase for ruby27 ... > > >>> Source prepared. > >>> Configuring source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work > >>> ... > > * Running configure phase for ruby27 ... > > >>> Source configured. > >>> Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0/work ... > > * Running compile phase for ruby27 ... > * Running compile phase for all ... > > >>> Source compiled. > > * Skipping make test/check due to ebuild restriction. > > >>> Test phase [disabled because of RESTRICT=test]: > >>> dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0 > >>> > >>> Install dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0 into /var/tmp/portage/dev-ruby/net- > > telnet-0.2.0/image/ > * Running install phase for ruby27 ... > Traceback (most recent call last): > 3: from :1:in `' > 2: from :1:in `require' > 1: from /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `' > /usr/lib64/ruby/2.7.0/rubygems.rb:16:in `require': cannot load such file -- > rubygems/compatibility (LoadError) > * Unable to find the gems dir > * ERROR: dev-ruby/net-telnet-0.2.0::gentoo failed (install phase): > * Unable to find the gems dir > --->8 > > There seems to be an inconsistency in the ruby packaging. Is there anything > I can do to evade it? I've attached the package-set files I use when > building a new system, for info. This doesn't happen in a stable system, only in ~amd64. It's consistent there, though, so I'm tempted to raise a bug report. -- Regards, Peter.
Re: [gentoo-user] Logic?
On 2023-04-06 17:22, Alan Grimes wrote: 1. My system was basically working last time I updated it several months ago. 2. Now both of my main web browsers are severely if not utterly foobar. 3. It required effort to change the system from the first state to the second... -> how much effort did it it take? =\ That said, the situation here was very stratge. I was looking for a chance to insert some down time for the system to swap out the water block on the CPU. I had gone out shopping and when I returned Chromium had suddenly stopped working for reasons I can't fathom. Ok, so I took the machine down and did the maintenance. When I brought it back up, chromium was still foobar and I'm like WTF... Apparently it inserted trillions of crash reports in its log directory and rm -rf'ing the crash reports alone is taking a very long time. (HDD on that volume...) On the build side, my pain list is as follows: tortoise /var/tmp/portage # tree -L 2 . ├── dev-lang │ └── ruby-3.1.4 << surprised as hell... no idea... ├── dev-ruby │ [REDACTED] │ ├── rubygems-3.4.6 << reports can't find variable "RUBY" even though it is definitely set. │ [REDACTED] ├── media-libs │ └── nas-1.9.5 <<< wtf, don't care enough to examine it. └── net-libs ├── signon-ui-0.15_p20171022-r1 └── webkit-gtk-2.40.0-r410 <<< apparently only user of Ruby no idea what it does or why it's on my system. Hi Alan, Hope this helps. The `equery` tool has a "depends" argument which shows packages depending on the atom argument. `equery depends webkit-gtk` will show any current installed packages depending on it. When I have a stale system to update, portage is always the first package I worry about getting updated. Once that is updated start with system packages and then world packages. But even with portage if there are emerge errors I uninstall every package causing an error. In a worst case, I have to go through the handbook and find the instructions for installing as on a fresh install and install it, https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Stage. In portage's case, I have had to remove setuptools and certifi to get past a dependency loop which was preventing portage from updating. Removing as many packages as necessary generally helps. The packages can be added back once the base components are updated. Regards, John
[gentoo-user] Circular dependencies...
Hi,
I got this:
# emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
RUBY_TARGETS=(ruby20)
[nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8, 1.9.3_p484:1.9]
USE=berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug -examples -rubytests
-socks5 -tk (-xemacs)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ]dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 [1.4.8] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 107 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 146 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
121 kB
[ebuild U ]dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) 457 kB
Total: 4 packages (4 upgrades), Size of downloads: 830 kB
* Error: circular dependencies:
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
(dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
It might be possible to break this cycle
by applying the following change:
- dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 (Change USE: -doc)
I added this to /etc/portage/package.use:
=dev-ruby/racc-1.49 -doc
and have set doc in the USE flags in make.conf.
I am still getting the above output...
How can I get out of this cycle out of this cycle out of this cycles
out of... ;)
Best regards,
mcc
Re: [gentoo-user] Circular dependencies...
On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 08:18:20 +0100
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
I got this:
# emerge --update --newuse --deep --with-bdeps=y @world -vp
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[nomerge ] virtual/rubygems-6:ruby20 [1:ruby18, 4:ruby19]
RUBY_TARGETS=(ruby20)
[nomerge ] dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353:2.0 [1.8.7_p374:1.8,
1.9.3_p484:1.9] USE=berkdb doc gdbm ipv6 ncurses rdoc readline ssl -debug
-examples -rubytests -socks5 -tk (-xemacs)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ]dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
[nomerge ] dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby)
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 [1.4.8] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 107 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 [1.7.7] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%) 146 kB
[ebuild U ] dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 [0.9.2.2] USE=doc {-test}
(-bash-completion%) RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) (-ree18%)
121 kB
[ebuild U ]dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 [3.12.2] USE=doc {-test}
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19 ruby20%* (-jruby) 457 kB
Total: 4 packages (4 upgrades), Size of downloads: 830 kB
* Error: circular dependencies:
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
(dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
(dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
It might be possible to break this cycle
by applying the following change:
- dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 (Change USE: -doc)
I added this to /etc/portage/package.use:
=dev-ruby/racc-1.49 -doc
1.49 != 1.4.9, is that not just a typo in your email?
Cheers,
Khumba
and have set doc in the USE flags in make.conf.
I am still getting the above output...
How can I get out of this cycle out of this cycle out of this cycles
out of... ;)
Best regards,
mcc
Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-minimal-install software list
On 14/01/2014 23:34, James wrote: Hello, I've beenlooking for the listing of software in the minimal install for amd64 Any ideas where to find it? Easiest is to look in /var/db/pkg inside the image file. This is for install-amd64-minimal-20131226: app-accessibility/brltty-4.2 app-accessibility/espeak-1.47.11-r1 app-accessibility/espeakup-0.71 app-admin/eselect-lib-bin-symlink-0.1.1 app-admin/eselect-pinentry-0.4 app-admin/eselect-python-2008 app-admin/eselect-ruby-20100603 app-admin/hddtemp-0.3_beta15-r7 app-admin/passook-20121001 app-admin/pwgen-2.06-r1 app-admin/syslog-ng-3.4.2 app-arch/bzip2-1.0.6-r3 app-arch/gzip-1.5 app-arch/tar-1.26-r1 app-arch/unzip-6.0-r3 app-arch/xz-utils-5.0.5-r1 app-crypt/gnupg-2.0.22 app-crypt/mit-krb5-1.11.4 app-crypt/pinentry-0.8.2 app-editors/mg-20110905-r1 app-editors/nano-2.3.2 app-laptop/radeontool-1.6.3 app-misc/ca-certificates-20130119 app-misc/editor-wrapper-4 app-misc/livecd-tools-2.0.3 app-misc/mime-types-9 app-misc/pax-utils-0.7 app-misc/screen-4.0.3-r6 app-misc/vlock-2.2.3 app-portage/mirrorselect-2.2.0.1 app-portage/portage-utils-0.30 app-shells/bash-4.2_p45 app-text/build-docbook-catalog-1.19.1 app-text/docbook-xml-dtd-4.1.2-r6 app-text/docbook-xml-dtd-4.2-r2 app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets-1.78.0 app-text/sgml-common-0.6.3-r5 app-text/wgetpaste-2.22 dev-lang/nasm-2.10.07 dev-lang/perl-5.16.3 dev-lang/python-2.7.5-r3 dev-lang/python-3.3.2-r2 dev-lang/python-exec-0.3.1 dev-lang/python-exec-2.0.1 dev-lang/ruby-1.8.7_p374 dev-lang/ruby-1.9.3_p484 dev-lang/ruby-2.0.0_p353 dev-lang/swig-2.0.9 dev-libs/boost-1.52.0-r6 dev-libs/elfutils-0.149 dev-libs/eventlog-0.2.12 dev-libs/expat-2.1.0-r3 dev-libs/glib-2.36.4-r1 dev-libs/icu-51.2-r1 dev-libs/iniparser-3.1 dev-libs/libaio-0.3.109-r4 dev-libs/libassuan-2.1.1 dev-libs/libev-4.15 dev-libs/libevent-2.0.21 dev-libs/libffi-3.0.11 dev-libs/libgcrypt-1.5.3 dev-libs/libgpg-error-1.12 dev-libs/libksba-1.3.0 dev-libs/libnl-3.2.23 dev-libs/libpcre-8.33 dev-libs/libtasn1-2.14 dev-libs/libverto-0.2.5 dev-libs/libxslt-1.1.28-r1 dev-libs/libyaml-0.1.4 dev-libs/mpc-1.0.1 dev-libs/nettle-2.7.1 dev-libs/newt-0.52.12 dev-libs/openssl-1.0.1e-r1 dev-libs/popt-1.16-r1 dev-libs/pth-2.0.7-r3 dev-perl/Locale-gettext-1.50.0 dev-perl/XML-Parser-2.410.0 dev-python/m2crypto-0.21.1-r1 dev-python/python-exec-1.1 dev-python/python-exec-1.2 dev-python/setuptools-0.8-r1 dev-ruby/json-1.8.0 dev-ruby/racc-1.4.9 dev-ruby/rake-0.9.6 dev-ruby/rdoc-4.0.1-r1 dev-ruby/rubygems-2.0.3 dev-util/boost-build-1.52.0-r1 dev-util/dialog-1.2.20130928 dev-util/gperf-3.0.4 dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.19 dev-util/intltool-0.50.2-r1 dev-util/ragel-6.7-r1 media-gfx/fbgrab-1.0-r2 media-libs/alsa-lib-1.0.27.1 media-libs/alsa-oss-1.0.25 media-libs/libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0 media-libs/libpng-1.5.17-r1 media-libs/portaudio-19_pre2021 media-sound/alsa-utils-1.0.27.1-r1 media-sound/gsm-1.0.13 media-sound/sox-14.4.1 net-analyzer/netselect-0.3-r3 net-analyzer/traceroute-2.0.18 net-dialup/globespan-adsl-0.11-r1 net-dialup/mingetty-1.08 net-dialup/ppp-2.4.5-r3 net-dialup/pptpclient-1.7.2-r3 net-dialup/rp-pppoe-3.8-r2 net-firewall/iptables-1.4.20 net-fs/cifs-utils-6.1-r1 net-fs/nfs-utils-1.2.9 net-fs/samba-3.6.22 net-irc/irssi-0.8.15-r1 net-libs/gnutls-2.12.23-r1 net-libs/libnfsidmap-0.24 net-libs/libtirpc-0.2.2-r1 net-misc/curl-7.33.0 net-misc/dhcpcd-5.6.4 net-misc/iputils-20121221 net-misc/ndisc6-0.9.9 net-misc/netifrc-0.1 net-misc/ntp-4.2.6_p5-r7 net-misc/openssh-5.9_p1-r4 net-misc/rdate-1.4-r4 net-misc/rsync-3.0.9-r3 net-misc/vconfig-1.9 net-misc/wget-1.14 net-nds/rpcbind-0.2.0-r1 net-proxy/dante-1.1.19-r4 net-proxy/ntlmaps-0.9.9-r2 net-proxy/tsocks-1.8_beta5-r5 net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017 net-wireless/crda-1.1.2-r3 net-wireless/rfkill-0.5 net-wireless/wireless-regdb-20130213 net-wireless/wireless-tools-30_pre9 net-wireless/wpa_supplicant-2.0-r2 sys-apps/acl-2.2.51 sys-apps/apmd-3.2.2_p14 sys-apps/attr-2.4.46-r2 sys-apps/baselayout-2.2 sys-apps/busybox-1.21.0 sys-apps/coreutils-8.21 sys-apps/dbus-1.6.12 sys-apps/dmidecode-2.11 sys-apps/ethtool-3.8 sys-apps/file-5.15 sys-apps/findutils-4.4.2-r1 sys-apps/fxload-20081013-r1 sys-apps/gawk-4.0.2 sys-apps/gptfdisk-0.8.6 sys-apps/grep-2.14 sys-apps/hdparm-9.39 sys-apps/help2man-1.40.11 sys-apps/hwdata-gentoo-0.4 sys-apps/hwids-20130915.1 sys-apps/hwsetup-1.2-r2 sys-apps/iproute2-3.8.0 sys-apps/kbd-1.15.3 sys-apps/keyutils-1.5.5 sys-apps/kmod-15-r1 sys-apps/less-457 sys-apps/man-pages-posix-2003a sys-apps/memtester-4.3.0 sys-apps/net-tools-1.60_p20120127084908 sys-apps/netplug-1.2.9-r5 sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 sys-apps/pciutils-3.2.0 sys-apps/pcmciautils-018_p8 sys-apps/portage-2.2.7 sys-apps/sandbox-2.6-r1 sys-apps/sdparm-1.07 sys-apps/sed-4.2.1-r1 sys-apps/shadow-4.1.5.1-r1 sys-apps/sysvinit-2.88-r4 sys-apps/tcp-wrappers-7.6-r8 sys-apps/util-linux-2.22.2 sys-apps/which-2.20 sys-auth/pambase-20120417-r3 sys-block/parted-3.1-r1 sys-block/partimage-0.6.9 sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.2.8 sys-devel/bc-1.06.95 sys
Re: [gentoo-user] Ruby - 3 versions - seriously????
Am 02. September 2017 um 21:18 Uhr -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com>: > Seeing as the OP is saying there are 3 versions queued for merge and > he has not installed any of them by hand it looks like Alan is > right. Perhaps the OP is using "old" Ruby based software, but software > of that age in another language could work on new interpreters. I took a moment and looked up the release announcements for the minor version releases between the versions the OP has installed: * https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2015/12/25/ruby-2-3-0-released/ * https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2016/12/25/ruby-2-4-0-released/ 2.4.0 saw breaking changes, 2.3.0 not. In 2.4.0, the most notable breaking change was the unification of Fixnum and Bignum into Integer. Other breaking changes affected the standard library (stdlib): * Tk was dropped from the stdlib. * XMLRPC was dropped from the stdlib. * Support for OpenSSL <= 0.9.7 was dropped from the stdlib. For Tk specifically, the reason for the removal was that the maintainer got demotivated by useless and even hostile feedback[1] and since nobody wanted step up, the library was removed from the stdlib[2]. The exact judgement of how grave these changes are is subjective. Fixnum and Bignum were not classes commonly used in Ruby code, so it may be viewed as a detail. They saw a more frequent use in C extensions, which may then be viewed more grave; the release announcement iself is pretty clear on this topic: Ruby 2.4.0 release announcment from 2016-12-25: > All C extensions which touch the Fixnum or Bignum class need to be > fixed. I was not too happy with this either, but most software continued to work. I don't know the reason why the OP was left with three versions of Ruby. Given the above release announcements, there are not too many reasons why his software should not work with newer versions of Ruby. All this only applies to the core language. Some RubyGems packages release very rigorously and some even make use of undocumented features of (the C interface of) the Ruby language. That's however a different problem. Am 02. September 2017 um 21:18 Uhr -0500 schrieb R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com>: > One of the reasons I dislike Ruby is that there is no complete > specification of the language available, making this statement > (technically) untestable. There *is* a formal complete ISO specification of the language available, approved in 2012[3]. Marvin [1]: Exact reasoning of the maintainer is here (in reply to me): http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/436401 [2]: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8539 [3]: https://www.iso.org/standard/59579.html
Re: [gentoo-user] Logic?
The rubygem / webkit problem has cropped up recently - do something like this 1. Mask webkit (I needed to do yelp as well on one system) 2. emerge any remaining updates so you can depclean 3. emerge --depclean (this removes old ruby versions and fixes the system 4. unmask webkit etc. 4. finish the updates. BillK On 7/4/23 17:31, John Acree wrote: On 2023-04-06 17:22, Alan Grimes wrote: 1. My system was basically working last time I updated it several months ago. 2. Now both of my main web browsers are severely if not utterly foobar. 3. It required effort to change the system from the first state to the second... -> how much effort did it it take? =\ That said, the situation here was very stratge. I was looking for a chance to insert some down time for the system to swap out the water block on the CPU. I had gone out shopping and when I returned Chromium had suddenly stopped working for reasons I can't fathom. Ok, so I took the machine down and did the maintenance. When I brought it back up, chromium was still foobar and I'm like WTF... Apparently it inserted trillions of crash reports in its log directory and rm -rf'ing the crash reports alone is taking a very long time. (HDD on that volume...) On the build side, my pain list is as follows: tortoise /var/tmp/portage # tree -L 2 . ├── dev-lang │ └── ruby-3.1.4 << surprised as hell... no idea... ├── dev-ruby │ [REDACTED] │ ├── rubygems-3.4.6 << reports can't find variable "RUBY" even though it is definitely set. │ [REDACTED] ├── media-libs │ └── nas-1.9.5 <<< wtf, don't care enough to examine it. └── net-libs ├── signon-ui-0.15_p20171022-r1 └── webkit-gtk-2.40.0-r410 <<< apparently only user of Ruby no idea what it does or why it's on my system. Hi Alan, Hope this helps. The `equery` tool has a "depends" argument which shows packages depending on the atom argument. `equery depends webkit-gtk` will show any current installed packages depending on it. When I have a stale system to update, portage is always the first package I worry about getting updated. Once that is updated start with system packages and then world packages. But even with portage if there are emerge errors I uninstall every package causing an error. In a worst case, I have to go through the handbook and find the instructions for installing as on a fresh install and install it, https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Stage. In portage's case, I have had to remove setuptools and certifi to get past a dependency loop which was preventing portage from updating. Removing as many packages as necessary generally helps. The packages can be added back once the base components are updated. Regards, John
[gentoo-user] Logic?
1. My system was basically working last time I updated it several months
ago.
2. Now both of my main web browsers are severely if not utterly foobar.
3. It required effort to change the system from the first state to the
second...
-> how much effort did it it take? =\
That said, the situation here was very stratge. I was looking for a
chance to insert some down time for the system to swap out the water
block on the CPU. I had gone out shopping and when I returned Chromium
had suddenly stopped working for reasons I can't fathom. Ok, so I took
the machine down and did the maintenance.
When I brought it back up, chromium was still foobar and I'm like WTF...
Apparently it inserted trillions of crash reports in its log directory
and rm -rf'ing the crash reports alone is taking a very long time. (HDD
on that volume...)
On the build side, my pain list is as follows:
tortoise /var/tmp/portage # tree -L 2
.
├── dev-lang
│ └── ruby-3.1.4 << surprised as hell... no idea...
├── dev-ruby
│ [REDACTED]
│ ├── rubygems-3.4.6 << reports can't find variable "RUBY" even
though it is definitely set.
│ [REDACTED]
├── media-libs
│ └── nas-1.9.5 <<< wtf, don't care enough to examine it.
└── net-libs
├── signon-ui-0.15_p20171022-r1
└── webkit-gtk-2.40.0-r410 <<< apparently only user of Ruby no
idea what it does or why it's on my system.
41 directories, 0 files
tortoise /var/tmp/portage #
The barf from ruby-3.1.4 is:
#
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/work/ruby-3.1.4'
make[2]: Entering directory
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/work/ruby-3.1.4'
:
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/work/ruby-3.1.4'
make -f exts.mk -Oline RUBY="./miniruby -I./lib -I. -I.ext/common "
top_srcdir="." note
make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'note'.
>>> Source compiled.
>>> Test phase [not enabled]: dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4
>>> Install dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4 into
/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/image
* Removing default gems before installation
make -j48 V=1 DESTDIR=/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/image
GEM_DESTDIR=/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/3.1.0 install
: > revision.tmp
BASERUBY = /usr/bin/ruby --disable=gems
CC = x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
LD = x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
LDSHARED = x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -shared
CFLAGS = -march=native -pipe -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC
XCFLAGS = -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong
-fno-strict-overflow -fvisibility=hidden -fexcess-precision=standard
-DRUBY_EXPORT -I. -I.ext/include/x86_64-linux -I./include -I.
-I./enc/unicode/13.0.0
CPPFLAGS =
DLDFLAGS = -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
-Wl,--compress-debug-sections=zlib -Wl,-soname,libruby31.so.3.1
-fstack-protector-strong
SOLIBS = -lz -lpthread -lrt -lrt -lgmp -ldl -lcrypt -lm
LANG = en_US.utf8
LC_ALL =
LC_CTYPE =
MFLAGS = -j48 -Oline
--jobserver-auth=fifo:/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/temp/GMfifo41
--sync-mutex=fnm:/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/temp/GmU4nvzS
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc (Gentoo 12.2.1_p20230304 p13) 12.2.1 20230304
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
/usr/bin/ruby --disable=gems -C "." \
-Itool/lib -rfileutils -rbundled_gem -answ \
-e 'BEGIN {FileUtils.mkdir_p(d = ".bundle/gems")}' \
-e 'gem, ver, _, rev = *$F' \
-e 'next if !ver or /^#/=~gem' \
-e 'g = "#{gem}-#{ver}"' \
-e 'if File.directory?("#{d}/#{g}")' \
-e 'elsif rev and File.exist?(gs = "gems/src/#{gem}/#{gem}.gemspec")' \
-e 'BundledGem.copy(gs, ".bundle")' \
-e 'else' \
-e 'BundledGem.unpack("gems/#{g}.gem", ".bundle")' \
-e 'end' \
-e 'FileUtils.rm_rf("#{d}/#{g}/.github")' \
gems/bundled_gems
/usr/lib64/ruby/3.1.0/rubygems.rb:15:in `require_relative': cannot load
such file -- /usr/lib64/ruby/3.1.0/rubygems/compatibility (LoadError)
from /usr/lib64/ruby/3.1.0/rubygems.rb:15:in `'
from
/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/work/ruby-3.1.4/tool/lib/bundled_gem.rb:2:in
`require'
from
/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/ruby-3.1.4/work/ruby-3.1.4/tool/lib/bundled_gem.rb:2:in
`'
from -e:in `require'
make: *** [uncommon.mk:1370: extract-gems-sequential] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
/usr/bin/ruby --disable=gems ./tool/file2lastrev.rb -q --revision.h
--srcdir="." > revision.tmp
./config.status --file=-:./template/ruby.pc.in | \
sed -e 's/\$(\([A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_]*\))/${\1}/g' \
-e 's|^prefix=.*|prefix=/usr|' \
> ruby.tmp.pc
pkg_config=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
