Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean and PyQt4 blocking

2009-03-02 Thread Paul Hartman
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 emerge --update
 --newuse --deep @system @world

Did you do that command? AFAIK depclean should only be done after
world has been fully updated.

I don't know what profile/arch you're running... On my system it was
recently upgraded to Qt-4.5, so if that's the case for you then I'd
unmerge the Qt-4.4 stuff entirely and then update world and see what
it tries to bring in.



Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean and PyQt4 blocking

2009-03-02 Thread Dale
Paul Hartman wrote:
 On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 emerge --update
 --newuse --deep @system @world
 

 Did you do that command? AFAIK depclean should only be done after
 world has been fully updated.

 I don't know what profile/arch you're running... On my system it was
 recently upgraded to Qt-4.5, so if that's the case for you then I'd
 unmerge the Qt-4.4 stuff entirely and then update world and see what
 it tries to bring in.


   

World the way it is set up includes system.  I don't use the sets
feature as of yet.  So world includes system as long as you leave off
the @ thingy.

I posted this on the forums after a day or so.  A developer posted the
fix.  Here it is quoted from
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-5524910.html?sid=5a3c9d2154aae9b9c83e8215933a8df7#5524910
 
:

 What is probably happening here is that PyQt4 is linking qt-assistant
 and qt-xmlpatterns, if these packages are installed. But they are not
 listed as dependencies in the ebuild. So you can either (1) leave
 things as installed now, or (2) unmerge qt-assistant and
 qt-xmlpatterns, and then rebuild PyQt4.

 That those packages are not listed in the PyQt4 ebuild as optional
 dependencies is a bug that needs to be fixed tho.

Unmerging those then rebuilding PyQt4 worked and it comes back clean. 
Finer than frog hair now.  ;-) 

Dale

:-)  :-) 




[gentoo-user] --depclean and PyQt4 blocking

2009-03-01 Thread Dale
Hi,

I did my weekly updates last night and as always I run --depclean -p
afterwards to see if anything needs cleaning out.  I seem to have ran
into something that doesn't make sense.  This is what I get:

 r...@smoker / # emerge -p --depclean

  * Always study the list of packages to be cleaned for any obvious
  * mistakes. Packages that are part of the world set will always
  * be kept.  They can be manually added to this set with
  * `emerge --noreplace atom`.  Packages that are listed in
  * package.provided (see portage(5)) will be removed by
  * depclean, even if they are part of the world set.
  *
  * As a safety measure, depclean will not remove any packages
  * unless *all* required dependencies have been resolved.  As a
  * consequence, it is often necessary to run `emerge --update
  * --newuse --deep @system @world` prior to depclean.

 Calculating dependencies... done!
  Checking for lib consumers...
  Assigning files to packages...
  * In order to avoid breakage of link level dependencies, one or more
  * packages will not be removed. This can be solved by rebuilding the
  * packages that pulled them in.
  *
  *   x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.2-r1 pulled in by:
  * dev-python/PyQt4-4.4.4-r1
  *
  *   x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.2 pulled in by:
  * dev-python/PyQt4-4.4.4-r1
  *
  Adding lib providers to graph...
  /
 Calculating dependencies... done!
  No packages selected for removal by depclean
  To see reverse dependencies, use --verbose
 r...@smoker / #

I have ran emerge -1va =x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.2-r1
=x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.2 =dev-python/PyQt4-4.4.4-r1 so that it
will re-emerge all the packages it was fussing about.  I get the same
thing.  I also ran revdep-rebuild -i and it comes back clean.  I then
did this, emerge -v1a =dev-python/qscintilla-python-2.3.2
=x11-libs/qscintilla-2.3.2 =dev-python/PyQt-3.17.6
=x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2-r1 =x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 and still get the same
thing.

Anybody ran into this?  Anybody have a clue why it keeps giving this
message?  Do I need to rebuild something else that I missed to clear
this up?

Dale

:-)  :-)