On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:22 AM, James <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: > Mark Knecht <markknecht <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > >> solution currently hooked to the big screen. ATI dripped support for >> the chipset in that box in the Linux driver and Gentoo decided not to >> support the old driver or the kernel required to run it so that >> machine hasn't been updated in over 2 years. > > > There are folks that pull support, via specific chipsets, forward > for such things as this. Are you suggesting that the folks at Gentoo > singularly decided not to pull this driver forward? The kernel > hackers (firmware folks focused on PC type hardware) usually > make these decisions. Gentoo folks, except for those involved > in firmware or low level drivers, usually have nothing to do > with drivers, based in the kernel space. Firmware folks often > backport drivers (same something for the 2.6.x to the 2.4.x) > to older kernels, or take sources from old kernels (say 2.4.x) > and port them to 2.6.x often in the embedded linux world. However > often these drives to not make it into the published kernels.
I am not suggesting anything about Gentoo, the devs, the packagers, nothing at all. I was simply trying to state facts, and probably did a bad job of it. Basically, I have an on-board ATI device on an old Asus motherboard where I require S-Video out. ATI stopped support S-Video on this specific chipset 3 years ago. They still support VGA. The S-Video capable driver only works with with a very old kernel. I would like to replace this whole machine with something newer and I'd like to use Nvidia because ATI didn't support me and Intel is broken with newer xorg-x11 on one machine I have, > > Also, drivers are "consolidated" all the time so that one "mega" > driver works with many devices. All of this I assume you know. > But video is a different horse. The video companies routinely > "age" or deprecated hardware and drivers so customers spend > new money. Not sure what the deal is in your case, I'm just > trying to help. > I appreciate that, but is it really 'help' when you start out your post trying to point me in a direction other than the one I asked for information on? you might have considered that I've thought about this and carefully asked what I thought I wanted to know. Instead it seems you wanted to take me in a direction contrary to what I was asking. However, in rereading my original post I can see your point of view so I apologize profusely. > > >> I don't have any TVs with HDMI. We don't watch TV all that much. If >> we do it's NetFlix DVDs or NetFlix via the Roku box. Myth just records >> junk mostly and I need to display it on the TV which has an extra >> S-Video input that I currently use. My wife doesn't play games, >> doesn't need 3D or anything fancy. > > > Nice to know. > >> I guess what I'm saying is who are **you** to decide what makes >> sense in my life or how I should spend my time and money? > > I think you miss-read my intentions. I was not really insisting > on what you do, just trying to provide a workable path towards > resolution. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt (trying to be > polite here) and assume you are frustrated, due to your driver > not being pulled forward in the new kernel stuff. Being nasty > only discourages folks from help you, imho. I did not see > anyone else bothering to help you, or discuss your options. Well, it is true that you're the only one who has answered so far. The post hasn't been out there very long so I didn't read anything into that. On the other hand, please consider that I asked about Nvidia S-Video because I have 3 working Nvidia GPUs, 1 working ATI GPU, two broken ATI GPUs and one broken Intel GPU. With those statistics which vendor would you expect me to choose? > > >> If you're >> not interested in answering my question then why not simply stay >> silent instead of this? If you want to start a thread of your own >> about the merits of that card then feel free to do so and then you and >> others can go down that path. > > Um, looking back at the email, you suggest you are spend new > money. You did not state that you hate ATI and only nvidia > solutions are viable. In fact you talk about Intel and ATI video > hardware. Nvidia, imho, is the most aggressive > company at deprecating old hardware. I know I have several > Nvidia cards sitting on the shelf, but, all of my ATI cards > are mostly usable... (note ymmv). > Agreed. I was not as clear as I could have been, although I think the title of the thread might cause one to exclude other vendors, assuming you will give the OP the benefit of the doubt that he/she/it/thing knows what they want. I think you actually didn't, but I can accept that. That said, I have still received no info on this list that answered the original question. I asked the same question this morning on the Myth list and got three targeted answers immediately, so my problem is solved. Thanks, Mark > > >> I'll consider ATI again when 100 people on this list say it's the >> best thing since sliced bread and they'd never buy another N-Video >> card. Until then goodbye to ATI if possible. > > > got it > > good luck > > > (pisst) if you look for somebody to pull the driver forward for you, > try to be nice to them....... Problem is Nvidia rarely makes the > chipset data available. ATI is much more copasetic with information, > imho. Of the dozens of embedded video drivers I have been > involved with, Nvidia is the one that always fails to provide > information necessary for small manufactures to use. ATI is > more forthcoming on critical data. There are many open source > efforts on ATI video cards and some on Intel too. I have not > really found any viable open source Nvidia driver projects.... > > > James > > > > >
