On 1/16/06, Abhay Kedia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 16 January 2006 19:17, Michael Crute wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Abhay I will give that a try when I get home today. I assume
> > aoss is part of alsa-utils? (I don't have portage handy to check this
> > out at the moment)
> >
> It comes from alsa-oss. This package gets compiled automatically, as a
> dependency, if you enable +oss use flag with alsa-driver
>
> >
> > On the topic of sound servers. Being fairly ignorant about sound on
> > linux (but willing to learn). Is there a good reason to use a sound
> > server or am I better off to use ALSA directly? What purpose do sound
> > servers serve?
> >
> If you check out mailing list archives of sometime back, you'll find me asking
> exactly the same question. At that time I was using aRts with KDE, and was
> experiencing nothing but problems. I did not get any concrete replies to this
> particular question i.e. "Why use a sound server anyways?". Just to see how
> things turn out, I disabled aRts and don't face any problems till now. I am
> using ALSA directly.
>
> You can also try disabling esd and see how things go for you. If you face any
> problems then you can enable it again, but I personally don't see any reason
> to use a sound server.

Thanks Abhay. I emerged alsa-driver and got more kernel modules than I
ever hope to see again. After some hacking I got rid of that and
emerged alsa-oss, started firefox with aoss and everything works like
a charm.

On the topic of sound servers I shutdown esd and started routing
everything straight to alsa and have no problems so I can cut that
overhead. I tend to agree with Richard, dmix obsoletes the sound
servers.

Thanks guys.

-Mike

--
________________________________
Michael E. Crute
Software Developer
SoftGroup Development Corporation

Linux takes junk and turns it into something useful.
Windows takes something useful and turns it into junk.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to