Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?

2011-09-13 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Tue, Sep 13 2011, Jonathan wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:26:35 -0400 > Philip Webb wrote: > >> I recently removed Java from my system: all I seem to have lost >> is direct access to the help files in LibreOffice, >> which have a fully adequate PDF substitute. > > The offlinehelp flag is now

Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?

2011-09-13 Thread Jonathan
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:26:35 -0400 Philip Webb wrote: > I recently removed Java from my system: all I seem to have lost > is direct access to the help files in LibreOffice, > which have a fully adequate PDF substitute. The offlinehelp flag is now in the libreoffice-l10n ebuild. I use Libreoffice

Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?

2011-09-11 Thread Allan Gottlieb
On Sun, Sep 11 2011, Philip Webb wrote: > 110910 Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> I converted two machines from icedtea (java6) to oracle-jdk-bin (java7). >> I did in effect >> emerge --depclean icedtea icedtea-web =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 >> On one machine portage now claims that I basicall

Re: [gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?

2011-09-10 Thread Philip Webb
110910 Allan Gottlieb wrote: > I converted two machines from icedtea (java6) to oracle-jdk-bin (java7). > I did in effect > emerge --depclean icedtea icedtea-web =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 > On one machine portage now claims that I basically don't need java > (see the output of --depcle

[gentoo-user] --depclean wants to remove much of java. Is this safe?

2011-09-10 Thread Allan Gottlieb
I converted two machines from icedtea (java6) to oracle-jdk-bin (java7). I did in effect emerge --depclean icedtea icedtea-web =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 =virtual/jdk-1.6.0 On one machine portage now claims that I basically don't need java (see the output of --depclean below). Can this be right? More