[gentoo-user] Heads up: KDE 4.3 does *not* work OK with Qt 4.6

2009-12-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I read on various blogs (especially Gentoo-related :P) that KDE 4.3.4 
works just fine with Qt 4.6.


If you were about to upgrade, spare yourselves some headaches.  It does 
not work just fine.  On first sight, it does seem to work, but if you 
look a bit better, it does not.  Symptoms of using KDE 4.3 with Qt 4.6:


  * Logging out of KDE takes half a minute.
  * Amarok takes ages to load.
  * The text on (Oxygen) push buttons is not centered.
  * Fonts and shapes appear somewhat messed up (e.g., the tray clock).
  * Global shortcuts (like CTRL+ESC to start System Activity) stop
working after a few hours of uptime.

There might be more, but I didn't stay around long enough to find out. 
I reverted to Qt 4.5.  Note that I *did* a full rebuild of all packages 
that depend on Qt, including all of KDE of course (equery depends is 
your friend).


Bottom line, KDE 4.3 *does* work with Qt 4.6, but it does *not* work 
just fine (there's a big difference between works and works fine).





Re: [gentoo-user] Heads up: KDE 4.3 does *not* work OK with Qt 4.6

2009-12-15 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag 15 Dezember 2009 17:23:34 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
 I read on various blogs (especially Gentoo-related :P) that KDE 4.3.4
 works just fine with Qt 4.6.

Well, it does. For me.

 If you were about to upgrade, spare yourselves some headaches.  It does
 not work just fine.  On first sight, it does seem to work, but if you
 look a bit better, it does not.  Symptoms of using KDE 4.3 with Qt 4.6:
 
* Logging out of KDE takes half a minute.

Maybe, didn't measure the time.

* Amarok takes ages to load.

Yes.

* The text on (Oxygen) push buttons is not centered.

It is here.

* Fonts and shapes appear somewhat messed up (e.g., the tray clock).

Not here. Tray clock sometimes messed up with TQ 4.5, too.

* Global shortcuts (like CTRL+ESC to start System Activity) stop
  working after a few hours of uptime.

Works fine here, even after days of uptime.

 There might be more, but I didn't stay around long enough to find out.
 I reverted to Qt 4.5.  Note that I *did* a full rebuild of all packages
 that depend on Qt, including all of KDE of course (equery depends is
 your friend).
 
 Bottom line, KDE 4.3 *does* work with Qt 4.6, but it does *not* work
 just fine (there's a big difference between works and works fine).

And there's also a big difference between works fine for me and works fine 
for 
you, it seems ;)

Bye...

Dirk



Re: [gentoo-user] Heads up: KDE 4.3 does *not* work OK with Qt 4.6

2009-12-15 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 15 Dezember 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
 I read on various blogs (especially Gentoo-related :P) that KDE 4.3.4
 works just fine with Qt 4.6.
 
 If you were about to upgrade, spare yourselves some headaches.  It does
 not work just fine.  On first sight, it does seem to work, but if you
 look a bit better, it does not.  Symptoms of using KDE 4.3 with Qt 4.6:
 
* Logging out of KDE takes half a minute.
not here

* Amarok takes ages to load.

not here either

* The text on (Oxygen) push buttons is not centered.

everything centered here

* Fonts and shapes appear somewhat messed up (e.g., the tray clock).

emm, no

* Global shortcuts (like CTRL+ESC to start System Activity) stop
  working after a few hours of uptime.

nope.

 
 Bottom line, KDE 4.3 *does* work with Qt 4.6, but it does *not* work
 just fine (there's a big difference between works and works fine).

bottom line your system is screwed and you think it is qt4.6