[gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Alexander Skwar
Darren Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoth the Alexander Skwar · maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: digg2ogg should be dir2ogg 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different version should be offered, when you emerge dir2ogg? Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Alexander Skwar Darren Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoth the Alexander Skwar · maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: digg2ogg should be dir2ogg 0.8 is the latest stable version. Why do you think, that a different version should be offered, when you emerge dir2ogg? Well,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Willie Wong
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: newer) version offered. Good enough? No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is, what's in the tree. And the latest

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Darren Kirby
Quoth the Willie Wong On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Darren Kirby wrote: Well, I'm the upstream author, and _I_ think there should be different (ie: newer) version offered. Good enough? No, not good enough, as that doesn't matter at all. All that matters is, what's in

[gentoo-user] Re: Re: how thorough is #emerge --sync?

2006-10-18 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Darren Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I did! Back on September 12th: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147360 Fine. Portage/emerge doesn't care about this, unless it is made available to it - eg. through an overlay. I don't know if it is overworked devs, lost in the shuffle, or what, but