Hi,
I don't know if this is clear by now, but apparently the glibc version
which is printed is the glibc version used to built python, because
libcname,libcversion = libc_ver(sys.executable)
in this line the version is determined of sys.executable which is the
python interpreter used to run the
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:47 -0400, Joshua Murphy wrote:
Hrm. I know just enough about python to get myself in trouble here...
but it looks like a python bug in magicking up the libc name and
version... but the below is WAY outside my level of practice with
python (it'll take re-reading and
Am Thursday 30 October 2008 13:26:27 schrieb Albert Hopkins:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 20:47 -0400, Joshua Murphy wrote:
Hrm. I know just enough about python to get myself in trouble here...
but it looks like a python bug in magicking up the libc name and
version... but the below is WAY outside
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 13:43 +0100, Heiko Wundram wrote:
snip
Again, this is utter bullshit. Python doesn't have a shoddy implementation
of libc_ver(), it just doesn't give you what you expect it to give you (it's
not a package manager, for gods sake), but rather what's of actual interest
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
=
System uname:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop, gcc-4.3.2,
glibc-2.8_p20080602-r0, 2.6.27-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been curious about something in emerge --info's output:
$ emerge --info
Portage 2.2_rc12 (default/linux/amd64/2008.0/desktop,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been curious about something in emerge
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Paul Hartman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update: it has something to do with platform.platform()
Now to search for platform by grepping all the .py files in /usr/lib.
Hopefully this will take less time than emerge --regen.
--
Andrey Vul
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a
Found the code, and it's actually part of python (as of 2.4).
Gentoo sets aliased to 1 when printing the system uname.
/usr/lib/python2.{4,5,6}/platform.py:
def _platform(*args):
Helper to format the platform string in a filename
compatible format e.g. system-version-machine.
Good digging around :). So this is a python bug then? Or does portage need
to be update for some change that went into python? Actually, is this really
even a bug...its just a minor cosmetic problem really.
One's bug is another's feature.
libc in uname is honestly WTF but this begs the real
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good digging around :). So this is a python bug then? Or does portage
need
to be update for some change that went into python? Actually, is this
really
even a bug...its just a minor cosmetic problem really.
One's
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good digging around :). So this is a python bug then? Or does portage
need
to be update for some change that went into python? Actually, is this
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
elif system in ('Linux',):
# Linux based systems
distname,distversion,distid = dist('')
if distname and not terse:
platform = _platform(system,release,machine,processor,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Joshua Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
elif system in ('Linux',):
# Linux based systems
distname,distversion,distid = dist('')
if distname and not terse:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Joshua Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
elif system in ('Linux',):
# Linux based systems
distname,distversion,distid = dist('')
if distname and not terse:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good digging around :). So this is a python bug then? Or does portage need
to be update for some change that went into python? Actually, is this really
even a bug...its just a minor cosmetic problem really.
One's bug is
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Andrey Falko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Andrey Vul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good digging around :). So this is a python bug then? Or does portage
need
to be update for some change that went into python? Actually, is this
21 matches
Mail list logo
