Hi list,
I'm kind of despair.
The history: We recently brought up a new firewall with Gentoo.
There are (for my finding) some big nets behind this firewall (1x public
/24, 2x public /27, 1x public /26, at least 2 private /24).
Filtering is done via iptables and snort should jump as IPS on
On Jan 4, 2012 11:20 PM, Peter Pan os...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi list,
I’m kind of despair.
The history: We recently brought up a new firewall with Gentoo.
There are (for my finding) some big nets behind this firewall (1x public
/24, 2x public /27, 1x public /26, at least 2 private /24).
On Jan 5, 2012 12:28 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Jan 4, 2012 11:20 PM, Peter Pan os...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi list,
I’m kind of despair.
The history: We recently brought up a new firewall with Gentoo.
There are (for my finding) some big nets behind this firewall
On Jan 4, 2012 11:20 PM, Peter Pan os...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi list,
- 8 snip
Can you post the output of ip rule sh?
And for every table listed in the above, post the output of ip route sh
table $TABLENAME?
Rgds,
]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2012 18:29
An: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user] ARP-Caching of non-link-local adresses
On Jan 4, 2012 11:20 PM, Peter Pan os...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi list,
I’m kind of despair.
The history: We recently brought up a new firewall
]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Januar 2012 18:56
An: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user] ARP-Caching of non-link-local adresses
On Jan 4, 2012 11:20 PM, Peter Pan os...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi list,
- 8 snip
Can you post the output of ip rule sh?
And for every table listed
6 matches
Mail list logo
