On Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:37:08 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
Used to do that - heaps of problems when using multiple machines and
multiple users.
There used to be problems when trying to download the same file from two
computers at once, but NFS-aware file locking in portage fixed that quite
a
On 11/06/06, Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip . . . ]
My approach is to make *LOCAL* copies on the client from mirrors. The
local server just happens to be the first mirror on the list. If it
doesn't have a required file, no problem, check the next mirror in the
list. The clients
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:18:11AM +, Mick wrote
How does boa compares with http-replicator in terms of
functionality/security?
boa is a lean+mean+fast webserver. See http://www.boa.org for details.
PS. Other than not running portmapper is there a way of securing it?
It has to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Walter Dnes wrote:
snip
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
- --
Jeremy Olexa
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Office: EE/CS 1-201
CS/IT Systems Staff
University of Minnesota
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:00:05 +0200, Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
/usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
boxes...
I've been doing it that way for years. there were some problems with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow like hell...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow like hell...
I really only do it
On 6/10/06, Michael Weyershäuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Jeremy Olexa wrote: Much simplier: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharingportage over NFS is slow like
On 10/06/06, Michael Weyershäuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:25:25 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the pros/cons of mounting portage over NFS Vs http-replicator?
If you only have one architecture and one system type or one system that
can be a superset of the others, nfs will serve you fine.
If you have multiple
Bob Sanders wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 10:25:25 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the pros/cons of mounting portage over NFS Vs http-replicator?
If you only have one architecture and one system type or one system that
can be a superset of the others, nfs will serve you fine.
Used to do that - heaps of problems when using multiple machines and
multiple users. http-replicator insulates you from that. It also
allows you to remove nfs if you dont need it for anything else - also
simplifies and makes the system (all machines) more reliable. nfs is ok
in its place, but
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 01:09:05AM -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
My approach requires 2 emerges (boa and rsyncd) and their config files
on the server plus inserting the server as the preferred mirror in 2
lines in
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 22:43:03 -0400
Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My approach requires 2 emerges (boa and rsyncd) and their config files
on the server plus inserting the server as the preferred mirror in 2
lines in /etc/make.conf on the client(s).
That's close to what I do at work.
On 10 June 2006 10:02, Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Much simplier:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Using_a_shared_portage_via_NFS
I have used that setup for some time and must say that sharing
portage over NFS is slow like hell...
Not here. 100baseT network is quite
We want to be kinder and gentler to the Gentoo mirrors. I have 2
machines; my main machine and a 1999 450 mhz PIII as hot backup. I
try to keep the backup up to date with apps duplicating the main
machine, so that if the main machine dies, I can restore some data from
backups and be running in
try torpage http://www.kroon.co.za/torpage.php
--
Ing. Anielkis Herrera González
Desarrollador de Nova LNX
Linux User #377809
Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
/usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
boxes...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Michael Weyershäuser wrote:
I don't really see the need for such elaborate setups. I just export
/usr/portage/distfiles via NFS on the server and mount it on all other
boxes...
That is a good way to do it. I was going to before but I had http thing
set up already. If you think about it and
19 matches
Mail list logo
