I am perturbed that beagle has grabbed 99% of CPU time. If I kill it,
within 5 seconds another process is spawned, again grabbing 99%. I
don't even USE beagle. Is it possible to unmerge it without affecting
other programs?
If I understand correctly, I have found the following to be quite good
Hello Albert,
Albert Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A good solution would be a tool that actually indexes files
in the background, and perhaps automatically when a file is
changed/added/removed. And not just text in files but also other kinds
of metadata. And when I click that
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:41 +0100, Jürgen Geuter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:21 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Beagle is not supposed to use an awful lot of CPU-time, except for rare
peaks. If it uses a lot of CPU-cycles for more than a few seconds it's a
bug - most likely in a
Ow Mun Heng wrote:
no clue what exactly is happening and now, I'm frequently getting pissed
at it and kill it.
This is version 0.2.16 in portage BTW
I saw the same until I unmerged beagle... again.
Makes me dream of 4 cores, one for beagle, one for beryl, one for daily
emerge, and
one to
Hi Ow,
on Tuesday, 2007-02-27 at 18:09:13, you wrote:
Does anyone here knows if beagle really sucks up resources?? I just
emerged it a week ago and I'm getting very pissed off at it as it's
using a lot of resources. The laptop doesn't get much idle time.
I was under the impression that this
no clue what exactly is happening and now, I'm frequently getting pissed
at it and kill it.
This is version 0.2.16 in portage BTW
How often do people here actually -use- beagle?
I removed it after finding I never really used it, and that the
default short cut for it and the memory usage it
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:50 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
How often do people here actually -use- beagle?
I removed it after finding I never really used it, and that the
default short cut for it and the memory usage it required to do little
more than a 'find -print0 blah | xargs -0 -iARG grep
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 18:26 -0600, Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 12:50 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
How often do people here actually -use- beagle?
I removed it after finding I never really used it, and that the
default short cut for it and the memory usage it required to do
Does anyone here knows if beagle really sucks up resources?? I just
emerged it a week ago and I'm getting very pissed off at it as it's
using a lot of resources. The laptop doesn't get much idle time.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:09 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Does anyone here knows if beagle really sucks up resources?? I just
emerged it a week ago and I'm getting very pissed off at it as it's
using a lot of resources. The laptop doesn't get much idle time.
Beagle is quite a resource hog and will
Ow Mun Heng skrev:
Does anyone here knows if beagle really sucks up resources?? I just
emerged it a week ago and I'm getting very pissed off at it as it's
using a lot of resources. The laptop doesn't get much idle time.
It is most likely due a bug in one of the plug-ins. I usually have
Jürgen Geuter skrev:
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 18:09 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
Does anyone here knows if beagle really sucks up resources?? I just
emerged it a week ago and I'm getting very pissed off at it as it's
using a lot of resources. The laptop doesn't get much idle time.
Beagle is quite
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 14:21 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Beagle is not supposed to use an awful lot of CPU-time, except for rare
peaks. If it uses a lot of CPU-cycles for more than a few seconds it's a
bug - most likely in a plug-in. Especially the SVG plug-in tends to have
issues.
13 matches
Mail list logo
