Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

> > I would strongly advise against that, just on principle. > > yasm is an assembler, and as such it's right at the bottom of the stack. > It's not unreasonable for such a package to use different FLAGS etc as > it's not a userland app. It's an app that builds things you use to build > a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:37, Adam Carter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > > through. Where is the code that strips the

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > 0 > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > through. Where is the code that strips the others? > Have you checked yasm's Makefile? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

# grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild 0 However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it through. Where is the code that strips the others?

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 12:08 AM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-6.4.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options > lists what instruction sets gcc expects for any "-march=" > > I would suggest rebuilding with... > > CFLAGS="-march=nocona -O2 -pipe" >

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 11:23:10PM -0800, Manuel McLure wrote > Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years > with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with > > CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Manuel McLure wrote: > Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years > with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with > > CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" > CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for both AMD64 and Intel?

Here's the situation. I have a system that's been running for many years with an Athlon 5050e processor. The system is built with CFLAGS="-march=k8-sse3 -O2 -pipe -msse3" CPU_FLAGS_X86="3dnow 3dnowext mmx mmxext sse sse2 sse3" I have the possibility of upgrading the system to a first-generation

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Emanuele Rusconi ema...@gmail.com wrote: - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS=-O2 -march=foomake' - I don't want to set CFLAGS as a persistent environment variable. Does the kernel building use the CFLAGS at all? You probably want CFLAGS_KERNEL and maybe

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:31:13 +0200 Ralf wrote: Hi, just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my kernel manually using menuconfig. So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel compilation? -

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Hi, On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it know what they are doing. Don't set anything. It is retarded. - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS=-O2 -march=foomake' - I don't want to set CFLAGS as a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 20:11:52 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: Am 30.04.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: Hi, On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it know what they are doing. Don't set

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 30.04.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Andrew Savchenko: Hi, On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 18:26:22 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: That simple. The kernel is too important and the people programming it know what they are doing. Don't set anything. It is retarded. - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS=-O2

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 29.04.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Ralf: Hi, just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my kernel manually using menuconfig. So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. as it should be. What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel compilation?

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Am 29.04.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Ralf: Damn, you're absolutely right. I just tested it using make V=1. kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside. But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none of the linux kernel processor family uses this flag... that does

[gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Hi, just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my kernel manually using menuconfig. So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel compilation? - I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS=-O2 -march=foomake' - I

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

- I don't like invoking 'CFLAGS=-O2 -march=foomake' - I don't want to set CFLAGS as a persistent environment variable. Does the kernel building use the CFLAGS at all? The arch is set during the configuration step (Processor type and features / Processor family), and there's an optimize for

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

Damn, you're absolutely right. I just tested it using make V=1. kernel make does override CFLAGs from the outside. But that's interesting: my processor supports -march=core-avx2 and none of the linux kernel processor family uses this flag... Thx Ralf On 04/29/2015 02:41 PM, Emanuele Rusconi

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs for kernel compilation

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 13:31:13 +0200, Ralf wrote: just a short question: I don't like genkernel, I always compile my kernel manually using menuconfig. So the CFLAGs of my make.conf won't get applied. What is the best way to (persistently) set the CFLAGs for the kernel compilation? - I

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you If you're building on the target machine, use the native CFLAG. It has been around for a while. It detects the CPU, and builds for it automagically. You don't have to do any more grunt

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote: Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you Well, why not give the standard -O2 -march=native a whirl, perhaps seasoned with -pipe. Or look at what march=native would actually yield: Create a simple c file: cat test.c EOF int main()

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

Thank you. I'll stick to -march=native for now Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you If you're building on the target machine, use the native CFLAG. It has been around for a while. It

[gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand not so really. What Cflags i should use, at moment i use CFLAGS=-O2 -march=atom -mtune=atom -mssse3 -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On 10/21/2013 03:09 PM, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand not so really. What Cflags i should use, at moment i use CFLAGS=-O2 -march=atom

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 15:33:37 +0100 thegeezer thegee...@thegeezer.net wrote: http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/CFLAGS use native - it does the working out for you if GCC is new CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe Ok thank you. Hope then better. Now compile orgy so 2 days and i have finished.

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:09:11PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand not so really. Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

I have four core: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz CFLAGS=-march=core2 -O2 -pipe CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} MAKEOPTS=-j5 -- Joseph On 10/21/13 16:09, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 09:20:42AM -0600, Joseph wrote: I have four core: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU 330 @ 1.60GHz Wikipedia says otherwise: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Atom_microprocessors#Dual-core_Nettop_processors -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ Please do not share anything from,

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote: Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook ran OK with 1 GB, but was very limited, especially once Firefox was loaded. 2 GB should be the minimum if you use a big desktop. No its only 1 GB. I

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote: Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook ran OK with 1 GB, but was very limited, especially once Firefox was loaded. 2 GB

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

В письме от 21 октября 2013 18:40:27 пользователь Frank Steinmetzger написал: On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: Hello, On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:15:30 +0200 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote: Do they have different amounts of RAM installed? My netbook

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote: Hello, on my netbook Acer Aspire One D255 is running Gentoo amd64 but its so slow. I have Samsung NC10 and there is running Gentoo better and that i understand not so really. What Cflags i should use, at moment i use

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

If you havent already, I would first verify that its actually CPU bound, before changing CFLAGs and recompiling everything. So take a look at top, vmstat, mpstat etc when you're noticing slowness. If it is truely CPU bound and you're going to recompile everything, you could consider upgrading to

Re: [gentoo-user] cflags for atom

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 11:45:35AM +1100, Adam Carter wrote: If you havent already, I would first verify that its actually CPU bound, before changing CFLAGs and recompiling everything. So take a look at top, vmstat, mpstat etc when you're noticing slowness. If it is truely CPU bound and you're

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Hi there! Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict CFLAGS, instead of just using -march=native. Her CPU is an AMD A6-3500 with three cores. As

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: Hi there! Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict CFLAGS, instead of just using

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Helmut Jarausch writes: On 03/12/2012 12:32:01 PM, Alex Schuster wrote: The command above does not tell about SSE stuff, so I used this one to find out about that: leela # echo | gcc -dME - -march=native | grep -Ei 'SSE|3DNOW|MMX' | Typo: The -E must be separate: gcc -dM -E -

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Am Montag, 12. März 2012, 12:32:01 schrieb Alex Schuster: Hi there! Recently, my sister could not log in to KDE after I had done some updates. X crashed when loggin into KDE. It turned out that x11-libs/qt-gui-4.7.4-r1 was the problem when compiled with explict CFLAGS, instead of just using

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS problem

Volker Armin Hemmann writes: and of course we all just use our crystal balls because it is so easy without the error message. Hmm, something about X shutting down in kdm.log. Can't check now because the system is down. But anyway, I don't think it matters, the problem is that the crash

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson Another good trick I've found on the forums

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 Can someone confirm this? I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel - AMD Helmut.

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 Can someone confirm this? I don't think so. It's part of the war Intel - AMD Helmut. Can you elaborate

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/28/2011 11:51:29 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: On 07/28/2011 11:40:40 AM, Kfir Lavi wrote: My guess is that -msse4.2 imply also -msse1..4.1 Can someone confirm this? I don't think so. It's part of

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz snip I guess *core2* is the right one? Yes, acc. to:

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson drukar...@gmail.com wrote: ** On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz snip I guess *core2* is the right one? Yes, acc.

RE: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

-original message- Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU From: Andy Wilkinson drukar...@gmail.com Date: 2011-07-27 21:09 Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: $ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h The last line of output will include the various CFLAGS

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson drukar...@gmail.comwrote: ** On 07/26/2011 12:22 PM, pk wrote: On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson Another good trick I've found on the forums is to run: $ gcc -### -e -v -march=native /usr/include/stdlib.h The

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy Wilkinson  Another good trick I've found on the forums is

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 21:24:33 Mark Knecht wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday 27 Jul 2011 17:13:21 Kfir Lavi wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Kfir Lavi lavi.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Andy

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 2011-07-27 20:32, Mick wrote: It seems that on my early i7, the -march=core2 does not have all the -msse* flags enabled, while native does: Acc. to this there is a flag for i7, BUT... I'm not sure if current stable version accepts it:

[gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo .. processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz stepping: 11 cpu MHz :

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo [snip] model name  : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100  @ 1.20GHz [snip] .. After a short research on this website:

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo .. processor   : 1 vendor_id   : GenuineIntel cpu family  : 6 model   : 15 model name  : Intel(R)

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tuesday 26 July 2011 20:36:14 Alokat did opine thusly: Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo .. processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? Hi, I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one. If you run this command: gcc -Q --help=target -march=native gcc will tell you what it thinks are the best options for your

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On 2011-07-26 22:36, Alokat wrote: model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz snip I guess *core2* is the right one? Yes, acc. to:

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? Hi, I think, in your case, core2 is the correct one. If you run this command: gcc -Q --help=target -march=native

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday 26 Jul 2011 20:02:05 Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? Hi, I think, in your case, core2 is the correct

Re: [gentoo-user] CFlags for CPU

On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:58 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Alokat mail...@alokat.org wrote: Hi folks, I'm wondering what kind of cpu-type I should use? cat /proc/cpuinfo [snip] model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU L7100 @ 1.20GHz [snip]

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hello all, Possible noob question. I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. Now I am reading through /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example My CFLAGS on that machine is the default currently: CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe But according to

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Am 02.11.2010 09:43, schrieb Coert Waagmeester: Hello all, Hello! Possible noob question. We all was noobs once, maybe I am still ;-) If I do change, how do I recompile everything? (like --newuse for USE changes?) To recompile all use emerge -e world The switch -e lets portage think

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Apparently, though unproven, at 10:43 on Tuesday 02 November 2010, Coert Waagmeester did opine thusly: Hello all, Possible noob question. I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. Now I am reading through /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example My CFLAGS on

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Tuesday 02 November 2010 2:13:41 pm Coert Waagmeester wrote: I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. also as far as i know, core2 is for core 2 duo quad etc cpus ... not for pentium D. -O2 -march=core2 -pipe use native as Alan suggested. or refer to

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

I feel like the Pentium D is march=prescott though, again, native should work fine as well. Chris Reffett On 11/02/2010 06:40 AM, Yohan Pereira wrote: On Tuesday 02 November 2010 2:13:41 pm Coert Waagmeester wrote: I have installed a 64 bit gentoo on my intel Pentium D machine. also as far as i

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike emerge -e ? Should it be avoided completely? James --

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Hello On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 01:53:56PM +, James wrote: Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Vim syntax highlighting does not show it in red, so I guess it means it is considered

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike emerge -e ? Should it be avoided completely? James Not

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

Dale wrote: James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike emerge -e ? Should it be avoided completely? James

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Thursday 21 February 2008, James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike emerge -e ? It's safe. Of

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike emerge -e ? Should it be avoided completely? James Hi,

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:53:56 + (UTC), James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS changes

On Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2008, KH wrote: James wrote: Hello, Current CFLAGS=-O2 -march=i686 -pipe I want to add -fomit-frame-pointer to my CFLAGS on an existing system that has been running for months. Is this safe or do I have to rebuild everything with somelike

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wednesday 16 January 2008 19:54:42 Kenneth Prugh wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 Cahn Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll have soon a new PC with Processor Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Which cflags do I need for it? Thank you very much. Roger CFLAGS=-O2 -march=nocona

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

hello, in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona BR tomas Peter Humphrey wrote: On Wednesday 16 January 2008 19:54:42 Kenneth Prugh wrote: On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 Cahn Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll have soon a new PC with

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote: Just a tiny hijack :-) My new laptop will have a T7100 CPU. I'd like to know what CFLAGS to use, but even before that should I use an AMD64 or IA64 installation medium? Maybe this wiki page could help: http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags --

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote: On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? Itanium2. You don't want to go there. Trust me. It's a bastard evolution of

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 15:36:51 Kenneth Prugh wrote: On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:38:47 + Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? Intel Itanium processors. (Your T7100 is a Core2) Of course. Thanks again; also to Etaoin. -- Rgds Peter --

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

http://gentoo-wiki.com/Safe_Cflags Intel Core 2 Duo/Quad / Xeon 51xx/53xx vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU @ XXXGHz *32 bit profile (x86)* CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-march=prescott -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:38:47 + Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? Intel Itanium processors. (Your T7100 is a Core2)

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 11:42:37 Tomas Papan wrote: in case that you want use 64bit system chose amd64 and -march=nocona OK, thanks. What then is IA64 for? -- Rgds Peter -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:10:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: Itanium2. You don't want to go there. Trust me. It's a bastard evolution of one of Intel's worst ideas ever I thought that would be Pentium 4 EE. :P -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hi, I'll have soon a new PC with Processor Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Which cflags do I need for it? Thank you very much. Roger -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 20:48:21 +0100 Cahn Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'll have soon a new PC with Processor Intel Core2 Duo E6850 Which cflags do I need for it? Thank you very much. Roger CFLAGS=-O2 -march=nocona -pipe should do it if your running stable AMD64. If you happened to

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

Hello On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:54:42PM -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe Could this happen a default in clean installation/manual sometime? Most people could leave this lake it is and never think about what flags to use. -- Please stay calm. There is

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:04:11 +0100 Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:54:42PM -0500, Kenneth Prugh wrote: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe Could this happen a default in clean installation/manual sometime? Most people could leave

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

On 1/16/08, Kenneth Prugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mtune=native -pipe CFLAGS=-O2 -march=native -pipe would be sufficient. On my system, it gives me (I have a core 2 duo) CFLAGS=-O2 -march=nocona -mtune=generic -pipe while with gcc-4.3, I get CFLAGS=-O2 -march=core2

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Stefan G. Weichinger schrieb: Maybe I will give it a try on another hdd and try to do a fresh install of x86_64 on that E2160, if the winter is long and boring ;-) Additional question here: Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from scratch, getting a

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600? Yes. I found some notes on the net amd64 is for x86_64, unsure about that ... That's right,

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Neil Bothwick schrieb: On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:37 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: Would I have to start with the amd64-live-cd when I want to install from scratch, getting a 64-bit-system with the Core2Duo E6600? Yes. I found some notes on the net amd64 is for x86_64, unsure about

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I found some notes on the net amd64 is for x86_64, unsure about that ... That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit chips. Thanks for clearing that, not very intuitive :) It was when the

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Neil Bothwick schrieb: On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:34:40 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: I found some notes on the net amd64 is for x86_64, unsure about that ... That's right, the architecture was originally for the AMD 64-bit chips. Thanks for clearing that, not very intuitive :)

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

David W Noon schrieb: You need to consider CHOST as well, to ensure you make the most of the newer CPUs. Here is what I use on an E6600 machine: CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu CFLAGS=-march=nocona -mmmx -m3dnow -msse -msse2 -msse3 -mfpmath=sse,387 -O2 -pipe Note that -fomit-frame-pointer

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 10 Nov 2007 09:30 in article [EMAIL PROTECTED] of linux.gentoo.user, Stefan G. Weichinger([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: David W Noon schrieb: You need to consider CHOST as well, to ensure you make the most of the newer CPUs. Here is

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Am Samstag, 10. November 2007 schrieb David W Noon: If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: emerge -e system emerge -e world Since -e means emptytree (as in dependency tree), the latter would be enough, right? Bye... Dirk signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: emerge -e system emerge -e world you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. Clearly you are completely clueless. Do *NOT* do this. It will

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

Bo Ørsted Andresen schrieb: On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: emerge -e system emerge -e world you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. Clearly you are completely

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

On Nov 10, 2007 2:18 PM, David W Noon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: emerge -e system emerge -e world you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. This was what you were planning anyway, but the change of

  1   2   >