Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion about gpg-preset-passphrase

2023-03-03 Thread efeizbudak
On 23/03/03 07:36AM, efeizbudak wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> So I'm trying to use gpg-preset-passphrase but for some reason I keep
> having to enter the passphrase all the same. I run
> 
> /usr/libexec/gpg-preset-passphrase --preset $KEYGRIP
> 
> and then paste the passphrase (I've also tried this with the keygrip for
> the [E] subkey as opposed to the [SC]). But then when I try to  decrypt
> a file encrypted for this key I still face pinentry. I also tried
> running the decryption command with the 
> 
> --pinentry loopback --batch
> 
> which just fails with 
> 
> gpg: Sorry, we are in batchmode - can't get input
> 
> And I already have in my gpg-agent.conf the following:
> 
> allow-preset-passphrase
> max-cache-ttl 2147483647
> 
> Am I misunderstanding something here? Can someone please point me in the
> right direction?
> 
> Thank you!
> 

To anyone who sees this, it was caused by my stupidity to use a very
illegal password. Please do not bother.

-- 
All the best,
Efe

The funny quote of this email is trivial and left as an exercise.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Confusion about gpg-preset-passphrase

2023-03-03 Thread efeizbudak
Hi all,

So I'm trying to use gpg-preset-passphrase but for some reason I keep
having to enter the passphrase all the same. I run

/usr/libexec/gpg-preset-passphrase --preset $KEYGRIP

and then paste the passphrase (I've also tried this with the keygrip for
the [E] subkey as opposed to the [SC]). But then when I try to  decrypt
a file encrypted for this key I still face pinentry. I also tried
running the decryption command with the 

--pinentry loopback --batch

which just fails with 

gpg: Sorry, we are in batchmode - can't get input

And I already have in my gpg-agent.conf the following:

allow-preset-passphrase
max-cache-ttl 2147483647

Am I misunderstanding something here? Can someone please point me in the
right direction?

Thank you!

-- 
All the best,
Efe

The funny quote of this email is trivial and left as an exercise.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] confusion on profiles

2015-02-24 Thread Douglas J Hunley
I just saw this today:
   [20]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-emul-linux-x86
   [21]  hardened/linux/amd64/selinux
   [22]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib
   [23]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux
   [24]  hardened/linux/amd64/x32

but I don't understand the difference between 20 and 24. I thought x32 was
the path to getting rid of the emul* stuff ?
-- 
Douglas J Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com)
Twitter: @hunleyd   Web:
about.me/douglas_hunley
G+: http://google.com/+DouglasHunley


Re: [gentoo-user] confusion on profiles

2015-02-24 Thread Markos Chandras
On 02/24/2015 03:53 PM, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
 I just saw this today:
 [20]  hardened/linux/amd64/no-emul-linux-x86 [21]
 hardened/linux/amd64/selinux [22]
 hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib [23]
 hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux [24]
 hardened/linux/amd64/x32
 
 but I don't understand the difference between 20 and 24. I thought
 x32 was the path to getting rid of the emul* stuff ? -- Douglas J
 Hunley (doug.hun...@gmail.com mailto:doug.hun...@gmail.com) 
 Twitter: @hunleyd
 Web: about.me/douglas_hunley http://about.me/douglas_hunley G+:
 http://google.com/+DouglasHunley

x32 is the new x86 ABI. 20, is a profile that has all the emul-*
packages masked, so the new multilib ebuilds take precedence. They are
completely different profiles

You probably need to read this:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Multilib_System_without_emul-linux_Packages

-- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras



Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion about slot conflict

2014-01-06 Thread 张东亚
I have just checked the ebuild file of libpng-1.6.8, actually it's is
stable for X86.
So I am confused why emerge can not upgrade it automatically...


2014/1/5 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

 On 05/01/2014 17:57, 张东亚 wrote:
  Hi list,
 
  When I do a world upgrade, I have encountered the following slot
 conflict:
 
 
  media-libs/libpng:0
 
(media-libs/libpng-1.5.17-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
  media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
  (dev-python/wxpython-2.8.12.1-r1::gentoo, installed)
  =media-libs/libpng-1.4:0/0= required by
  (net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.8.3-r201::gentoo, installed)
  media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (app-text/poppler-0.22.5::gentoo,
  installed)
  media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
  (media-libs/libwebp-0.3.1::gentoo, installed)
  media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
  (net-print/cups-filters-1.0.36-r1::gentoo, installed)
  media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (kde-base/kdelibs-4.11.4::gentoo,
  installed)
 
(media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled
 in by
  (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
 
 
  My question is, seems upgrade to libpng-1.6.8 will solve the conflict,
  why emerge cannot proceed this automatically? or there are some switches
  to controller this?
 
  Thanks a lot.



 libpng-1.5.17-r1 is latest stable version
 libpng-1.6.8 is latest unstable version

 I suspect you are probably running a stable system with several packages
 marked unstable and one of those requires libpng-1.6.8

 To check, please post

 what is your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in make.conf?

 what is the output of

 grep -r libpng /etc/portage/



 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com





[gentoo-user] Confusion about slot conflict

2014-01-05 Thread 张东亚
Hi list,

When I do a world upgrade, I have encountered the following slot conflict:


media-libs/libpng:0

  (media-libs/libpng-1.5.17-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
(dev-python/wxpython-2.8.12.1-r1::gentoo, installed)
=media-libs/libpng-1.4:0/0= required by
(net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.8.3-r201::gentoo, installed)
media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (app-text/poppler-0.22.5::gentoo,
installed)
media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (media-libs/libwebp-0.3.1::gentoo,
installed)
media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
(net-print/cups-filters-1.0.36-r1::gentoo, installed)
media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (kde-base/kdelibs-4.11.4::gentoo,
installed)

  (media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
(no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)


My question is, seems upgrade to libpng-1.6.8 will solve the conflict, why
emerge cannot proceed this automatically? or there are some switches to
controller this?

Thanks a lot.


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion about slot conflict

2014-01-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/01/2014 17:57, 张东亚 wrote:
 Hi list,
 
 When I do a world upgrade, I have encountered the following slot conflict:
 
 
 media-libs/libpng:0
 
   (media-libs/libpng-1.5.17-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
 (dev-python/wxpython-2.8.12.1-r1::gentoo, installed)
 =media-libs/libpng-1.4:0/0= required by
 (net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.8.3-r201::gentoo, installed)
 media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (app-text/poppler-0.22.5::gentoo,
 installed)
 media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
 (media-libs/libwebp-0.3.1::gentoo, installed)
 media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by
 (net-print/cups-filters-1.0.36-r1::gentoo, installed)
 media-libs/libpng:0/0= required by (kde-base/kdelibs-4.11.4::gentoo,
 installed)
 
   (media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
 (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot)
 
 
 My question is, seems upgrade to libpng-1.6.8 will solve the conflict,
 why emerge cannot proceed this automatically? or there are some switches
 to controller this?
 
 Thanks a lot.



libpng-1.5.17-r1 is latest stable version
libpng-1.6.8 is latest unstable version

I suspect you are probably running a stable system with several packages
marked unstable and one of those requires libpng-1.6.8

To check, please post

what is your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in make.conf?

what is the output of

grep -r libpng /etc/portage/



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




[gentoo-user] Confusion with eix output

2010-04-21 Thread James Cunning
I am having some trouble, I think, with my nvidia video driver, and eix 
produces some output I cannot decipher from information in the man page:

jlc64 X11 # eix nvidia-drivers
[D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
 Available versions:  [M]71.86.07!s [M]~71.86.09!s 96.43.09!s ~96.43.11!s 
173.14.15!s ~173.14.18!s 180.29!s ~180.60!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk 
kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
 Installed versions:  190.42-r3!s(11:04:43 AM 04/21/2010)(acpi gtk 
kernel_linux multilib -custom-cflags)
 Homepage:http://www.nvidia.com/
 Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries

The man page goes into great detail how to specify many things, but doesn't 
explain in simple terms the format of its default outputs.  In particular, I 
don't understand what the [D] means, but would appreciate any clues to a more 
comprehensible explanation for all its output.
-- 
Jim



Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion with eix output

2010-04-21 Thread Mike Edenfield
On 4/21/2010 3:48 PM, James Cunning wrote:
 I am having some trouble, I think, with my nvidia video driver, and eix 
 produces some output I cannot decipher from information in the man page:
 
 jlc64 X11 # eix nvidia-drivers
 [D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
  Available versions:  [M]71.86.07!s [M]~71.86.09!s 96.43.09!s ~96.43.11!s 
 173.14.15!s ~173.14.18!s 180.29!s ~180.60!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk 
 kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
  Installed versions:  190.42-r3!s(11:04:43 AM 04/21/2010)(acpi gtk 
 kernel_linux multilib -custom-cflags)
  Homepage:http://www.nvidia.com/
  Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
 
 The man page goes into great detail how to specify many things, but doesn't 
 explain in simple terms the format of its default outputs.  In particular, I 
 don't understand what the [D] means, but would appreciate any clues to a more 
 comprehensible explanation for all its output.

I feel your pain.  The eix man page is a perfect example of why GNU made
the info system (which is otherwise overkill in most cases.)

At any rate: eix's output tries to mimic the emerge -v output when
possible.  In this case, [D] means eix thinks your installed version is
higher than the latest unmasked version in the tree, and that you should
'D'owngrade.  You could also see 'U', if eix thinks you need to upgrade.

You probably need to eix-update after your most recent sync.  Use
eix-sync instead of emerge --sync if, like me, you tend to forget that step.

--Mike




Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-22 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti:

 Is there any other solution?

The same problem came up on gentoo-user-de yesterday, too. One replier told us 
that there was a portage news item about this topic:

2009-09-27-qt_use_changes
  Title Qt 4.5.2 default USE flag changes
  AuthorAlex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org
  Posted2009-09-27
  Revision  1

Qt version 4.5.2 has significant changes in the USE flags enabled by
default.

When upgrading, make sure you check and re-enable any USE flags you
need.

Depending on your system and installed packages, you might hit an issue
where Portage is getting confused by this USE flag change, trying to mix
old 4.5.1 ebuilds with new 4.5.2 ones, resulting in blocks.

If this happens to you, please add the offending USE flags (usually
'qt3support' and 'dbus') in your USE= or switch to a desktop profile
(eselect profile list). Check this post [0] for more details on this
issue.

[0] http://www.linuxized.com/p192;

So it could be a good idea to read your portage news.

HTH...

Dirk

  


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-22 Thread Mick
2009/10/22 Dirk Heinrichs dirk.heinri...@online.de:
 Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti:

 Is there any other solution?

 The same problem came up on gentoo-user-de yesterday, too. One replier told us
 that there was a portage news item about this topic:

 2009-09-27-qt_use_changes
  Title                     Qt 4.5.2 default USE flag changes
  Author                    Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org
  Posted                    2009-09-27
  Revision                  1

 Qt version 4.5.2 has significant changes in the USE flags enabled by
 default.

 When upgrading, make sure you check and re-enable any USE flags you
 need.

 Depending on your system and installed packages, you might hit an issue
 where Portage is getting confused by this USE flag change, trying to mix
 old 4.5.1 ebuilds with new 4.5.2 ones, resulting in blocks.

 If this happens to you, please add the offending USE flags (usually
 'qt3support' and 'dbus') in your USE= or switch to a desktop profile
 (eselect profile list). Check this post [0] for more details on this
 issue.

 [0] http://www.linuxized.com/p192;

 So it could be a good idea to read your portage news.

Always do!

Thanks for your post.  It made me realise that I was still on the
default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop profile!  I must have missed any
notices that the 10.0 profile was out.
-- 
Regards,
Mick



Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-21 Thread Mick
On Sunday 18 October 2009, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
 Am Sonntag 18 Oktober 2009 18:54:54 schrieb econti:
  [ebuild  N] app-office/akonadi-server-1.2.1  USE=mysql -sqlite
  [nomerge  ] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2
  [ebuild UD]   x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
  [ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-sql-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
  [ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1 [4.5.2-r2] USE=dbus*
  gtkstyle%* [ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
  [ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
  [ebuild UD]  x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 [4.5.2]

 Hmm, looks like your installed version of qt-dbus is responsible for the
 wanted downgrade. Strange.

 Could you diff the installed .ebuild for x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2
 (/var/db/pkg/x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2/qt-dbus-4.5.2.ebuild) with the one in
 your portage tree and re-install the package if they're different?

 Then, there are two other things which make me wonder:
  [blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1-r
  (x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1- r is blocking
  x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1,
  x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)

 Those -r versions emerge is talking about. Any chance you have
 installed qt packages (or some apps which need them) from an overlay?

  ('installed', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1', 'nomerge') pulled in by
 x11-libs/qt-webkit required by world

 2) Do you have qt packages listed in your world file? They're usually
 pulled in as dependencies of other packages, so they shouldn't appear
 there.

 Bye...

   Dirk

Hmm ... I seem to have these three in my world file (not sure about the OP):

x11-libs/qt
x11-libs/qt-core
x11-libs/qt-gui

Should I delete them?
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-21 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:53:54 +0100, Mick wrote:

 Hmm ... I seem to have these three in my world file (not sure about the
 OP):
 
 x11-libs/qt
 x11-libs/qt-core
 x11-libs/qt-gui
 
 Should I delete them?

Do you run them yourself? If not, they don't belong in world. The first
could be particularly troublesome as it is masked for QT4.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

If Satan ever loses his hair, there'll be hell toupee.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-21 Thread Mick
On Thursday 22 October 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:53:54 +0100, Mick wrote:
  Hmm ... I seem to have these three in my world file (not sure about the
  OP):
 
  x11-libs/qt
  x11-libs/qt-core
  x11-libs/qt-gui
 
  Should I delete them?

 Do you run them yourself? If not, they don't belong in world. The first
 could be particularly troublesome as it is masked for QT4.

Thanks.  It seems that I have forgotten to add -1 to emerge once too many and 
keep finding stuff that shouldn't be in world.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-18 Thread econti

Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:

Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti:
  
Now, to emerge akonadi-server, kcontrol I should downgrade all the qt-* 
to the 4.5.1 version.



Says who? You can only tell what want's the downgrade when you add -t. 
akonadi-server needs some qt packages with a version =4.5.0 and kcontrol is 
a KDE 3.5 package which won't pull in QT 4 at all.
  

Attached the output of emerge -tp akonadi-server. :-(
Bye
emilio

localhost ~ # emerge -pt akonadi-server

These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild  N] app-office/akonadi-server-1.2.1  USE=mysql -sqlite
[nomerge  ] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2
[ebuild UD]   x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
[ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-sql-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
[ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1 [4.5.2-r2] USE=dbus* gtkstyle%*
[ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
[ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
[ebuild UD]  x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
[blocks B ]  x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 is blocking 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2-r2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1-r 
(x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1-r is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.1-r 
(x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.1-r is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1-r 
is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1-r is 
blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.1-r is 
blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2 is blocking 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2-r2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1-r 
is blocking x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2 is 
blocking x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2-r2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1, 
x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1-r 
(x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1-r is blocking x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2 is blocking 
x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2 is blocking 
x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2-r2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, 
x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1, 
x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-sql-4.5.1-r is 
blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1-r 
(x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1-r is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.1-r 
is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)
[blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2 (x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.2 
is blocking x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.2-r2, x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.2-r1, 
x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.5.2, 
x11-libs/qt-svg-4.5.2, x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.2)

 * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
 * installed at the same time on the same system.

  ('installed', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1', 

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-18 Thread Nagatoro
On Sunday 18 October 2009 18.54.54 econti wrote:
 Dirk Heinrichs ha scritto:
  Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti:
  Now, to emerge akonadi-server, kcontrol I should downgrade all the qt-*
  to the 4.5.1 version.
 
  Says who? You can only tell what want's the downgrade when you add -t.
  akonadi-server needs some qt packages with a version =4.5.0 and
  kcontrol is a KDE 3.5 package which won't pull in QT 4 at all.
 
 Attached the output of emerge -tp akonadi-server. :-(

Don't know for sure but could it be that you have qt packages from two 
different versions installed?
(try running eix -Ic ^qt- and see if all versions match)

/Naga



Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-18 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag 18 Oktober 2009 18:54:54 schrieb econti:
 [ebuild  N] app-office/akonadi-server-1.2.1  USE=mysql -sqlite
 [nomerge  ] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2
 [ebuild UD]   x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
 [ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-sql-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
 [ebuild UD]x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1 [4.5.2-r2] USE=dbus* gtkstyle%*
 [ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
 [ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1 [4.5.2]
 [ebuild UD]  x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1 [4.5.2]

Hmm, looks like your installed version of qt-dbus is responsible for the 
wanted downgrade. Strange.

Could you diff the installed .ebuild for x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2 
(/var/db/pkg/x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.2/qt-dbus-4.5.2.ebuild) with the one in your 
portage tree and re-install the package if they're different?

Then, there are two other things which make me wonder:

 [blocks B ] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1-r (x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.5.1-
 r is blocking x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-script-4.5.1,
 x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-core-4.5.1, x11-libs/qt-gui-4.5.1)

Those -r versions emerge is talking about. Any chance you have installed 
qt packages (or some apps which need them) from an overlay?

 ('installed', '/', 'x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.5.2-r1', 'nomerge') pulled in by
x11-libs/qt-webkit required by world

2) Do you have qt packages listed in your world file? They're usually pulled in 
as dependencies of other packages, so they shouldn't appear there.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Confusion

2009-10-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Samstag 17 Oktober 2009 17:54:49 schrieb econti:
 Now, to emerge akonadi-server, kcontrol I should downgrade all the qt-* 
 to the 4.5.1 version.

Says who? You can only tell what want's the downgrade when you add -t. 
akonadi-server needs some qt packages with a version =4.5.0 and kcontrol is 
a KDE 3.5 package which won't pull in QT 4 at all.

 Then to mask all the new kde4 packages, qt-*-4.5.2 
 and xulrunner. Is it right?

How do come to this conclusion? Run your emerge command again with -t and 
you'll see clearer.

Bye...

Dirk


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.