[gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Dan
Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. I get a mess: i686 -march=athlon -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread John Jolet
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 09:20, Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. I get a mess: i686 -march=athlon -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Christoph Gysin
John Jolet wrote: add -radius to your USE flags? How willl this help? $ grep IUSE /usr/portage/net-analyzer/ethereal/*.ebuild IUSE=adns gtk ipv6 snmp ssl kerberos Christoph -- echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr * !#:2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Dave Nebinger
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DINET6 -D_U_=__attribute__((unused)) -Wall -W -O -mcpu=i686 -march=athlon -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Dave Nebinger
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 11:06 am, Richard Fish wrote: In either case, the solution is the same: MAKEOPTS=j1 emerge ethereal. Sorry, but I can attest to -j(n 1) works locally for me. It is most likely not the issue. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Scott Tiret
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:20 +1000, Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. Try revdep-rebuild. If it is not available emerge gentoolkit and try again. You may have some missing links to the libraries. Good luck, -- Scott Tiret [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Dave Nebinger
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 11:56 am, Scott Tiret wrote: On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:20 +1000, Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. Try revdep-rebuild. If it is not available emerge gentoolkit and try again. You may have some missing links to the

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Douglas James Dunn
im not sure if this is relevant but is radius not some kind of client server protocol On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:20 +1000, Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. I get a mess: i686 -march=athlon -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -I/usr/local/include

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:20:28 +1000 Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. Please please do NOT hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread do NOT just reply to another message and change the subject. -- Nick Rout [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error -SOLVED - [blush...]

2005-10-18 Thread Dan
Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. SNIP useless error messages Why does it want a radius directory anyway? How do I fix this? I tried again with ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=x86. As always, it just emerges the same packages anyway, but I let it run

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Dan
Nick Rout wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:20:28 +1000 Dan wrote: Please help -- I can't emerge ethereal and I would really like to use it. Please please do NOT hijack threads. If you wish to start a new thread do NOT just reply to another message and change the subject. That's a

Re: [gentoo-user] Ethereal compile error

2005-10-18 Thread Nick Rout
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:12:39 +1000 Dan wrote: That's a little ironic -- I've been doing that on mailing lists for years, I noticed the effect myself right after I sent the message with thunderbird's threaded view. Noone has ever complained before, until now -- in other words, the