Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:36:59 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I just added to make.conf > >> ABI_X86="32 64" > > > > You can do that, but it build a lot of 32 bit libraries that you don't > > need, significantly increasing build times. > > That is true, so how do you clean up

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 03/27/2017 02:10 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:30:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > grep -r udev /etc/portage /etc/portage/package.use:sys-fs/udev extras /etc/portage/package.use:=sys-fs/eudev-1.10-r2 abi_x86_32

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 18:30:12 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> grep -r udev /etc/portage > >> /etc/portage/package.use:sys-fs/udev extras > >> /etc/portage/package.use:=sys-fs/eudev-1.10-r2 abi_x86_32 > >> /etc/portage/package.use:>=virtual/libudev-215-r1 abi_x86_32 > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 03/26/2017 05:34 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 16:58:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >>> To repeat what I said before, a virtual and the package satisfying it >>> must have matching USE flags. If your flags for virtual/libudev and >>> eudev don't match, portage will

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 16:58:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > To repeat what I said before, a virtual and the package satisfying it > > must have matching USE flags. If your flags for virtual/libudev and > > eudev don't match, portage will try to install the default for > > libudev, which

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On March 25, 2017 8:36:01 PM GMT+01:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: >On 25/03/2017 16:37, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> On 03/25/2017 03:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 25/03/2017 09:49, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 03/25/2017 04:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:10:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >>> The full output of emerge, with the --tree option, would put these >>> messages in context. >>> sys-fs/eudev:0 (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo, ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

Thelma On 03/25/2017 04:31 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:10:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >>> The full output of emerge, with the --tree option, would put these >>> messages in context. >>> sys-fs/eudev:0 (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo,

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 03/25/2017 01:36 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 25/03/2017 16:37, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: [snip] >> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy >> ">=sys-libs/ncurses-5.2-r2:0/5=[unicode]" have been masked. >> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your >> request: >> -

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:10:25 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > The full output of emerge, with the --tree option, would put these > > messages in context. > > > >> sys-fs/eudev:0 > >> > >> (sys-fs/eudev-3.1.5:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled > >> in by (no parents that

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 25/03/2017 16:37, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: On 03/25/2017 03:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 25/03/2017 09:49, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: Those are not blockers. The part of emerge output above this, the bit you snipped out,

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 25/03/2017 16:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: Thelma On 03/25/2017 03:08 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:49:58 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 03/25/2017 03:00 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 25/03/2017 09:49, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: > > Those are not blockers. > > The part of emerge output above this, the bit you snipped out, shows > *what* portage wants to do. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

Thelma On 03/25/2017 03:08 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:49:58 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: >> >> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been >> pulled !!! into the dependency

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 01:49:58 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been > pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: The full ootput of emerge,

Re: [gentoo-user] Few blockers left

On 25/03/2017 09:49, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: Those are not blockers. The part of emerge output above this, the bit you snipped out, shows *what* portage wants to do. The bits below show you *why* it's doing that - usually why

[gentoo-user] Few blockers left

I'm upgrading my last system and have few blockers left: !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: x11-libs/libxcb:0 (x11-libs/libxcb-1.12:0/1.12::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by