On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:05:20 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > My usual routine for doing a global update is
> >
> > emerge -avuND world
> > conf-update
> > emerge -av @preserved-rebuild
> > revdep-rebuild -p -i (then without -p if something is found)
> > emerge -a --depclean
> > view portage logs and
On Feb 8, 2012 2:38 AM, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>
> > On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 00:11:26 +0700
Pandu Poluan wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
> >
> > Yes, it should be OK as long as you run
> > etc
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
Postfix daemons now live under /usr/libexec/postfix
(not under /usr/lib{,64)/postfix).
I'm curious - is there a good reason for this change?
On 2012-02-07 2:36 AM, Eray Aslan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
Yes, it should be OK as long as you run
etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar after the upgrade.
I was concerned about this at
On Feb 7, 2012 2:39 PM, "Eray Aslan" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> > S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
>
> Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar
> after the upgrade. Postfix daemons now
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:51:51PM +0100, Andrea Conti wrote:
> Luckily the error messages are informative enough... but let's say that
> a word of caution in the emerge message would have been welcomed.
There is a warning printed if you emerged without the berkdb flag when
you upgraded from
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 01:58:33PM +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> S... I'm still on 2.8.7. Is it safe to upgrade to 2.9.0-r1 ?
Yes, it should be OK as long as you run etc-update/dispatch-conf/similar
after the upgrade. Postfix daemons now live under /usr/libexec/postfix
(not under /usr/lib{,64)
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 01:05, Paul Hartman
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> wrote:
>> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
>> wrote:
>>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemm
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:05:38 schrieb Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> wrote:
> > Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
> >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schri
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> wrote:
>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Hel
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
> wrote:
>> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helm
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:47:45 schrieb Michael Mol:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger
wrote:
> > Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> >> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> beware of installing postfix-2.
> BTW postfix 2.9.0 also fails to emerge if USE="vda" because it tried
> to apply the patch for 2.8.5. (patch for 2.9.0 has not yet been
> released)
And it also fails to start if have maps in hash format and emerge with
USE=-berkdb.
Luckily the error messages are informative enough... but let's s
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
>> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have
Am 06.02.2012 18:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
>> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
>
>
> postfix 2.9.0 wor
Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012, 12:06:41 schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
postfix 2.9.0 works fine for me.
But I also run cfg-update after the update and
Am 06.02.2012 16:42, schrieb Paul Hartman:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
>> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
>> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
>
> Maybe a side-effect of bug 40191
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
> When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
> installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
Maybe a side-effect of bug 401911
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401911
BTW po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.02.2012 12:06, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beware of installing postfix-2.9.0 When started it tries to access
> /usr/lib/postfix but files have been installed into
> /usr/libexec/postfix
>
> And after re-emerging postfix-2.8.8 I couldn't d
Hi,
beware of installing postfix-2.9.0
When started it tries to access /usr/lib/postfix but files have been
installed into /usr/libexec/postfix
And after re-emerging postfix-2.8.8 I couldn't do
/etc/init.d/postfix restart
since openrc was thinking it's still running.
Since it was urgent I rebo
21 matches
Mail list logo
