On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:45:46 +0800
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote:
> >> I do understand that getting something stable and working then
> >> wanting to keep it that way. I'm just wondering what h
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote:
>> I do understand that getting something stable and working then wanting
>> to keep it that way. I'm just wondering what his mileage may be in the
>> long run.
>
> I can only imagine what will
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:56:47 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 22:40:54 Michael Higgins wrote:
> > Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for
> > a while, yet allow package-rN updates...
>
> This doesn't seem to be a built-in feature of portage afte
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:40:54 -0700
Michael Higgins wrote:
> Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a
> while, yet allow package-rN updates...
>
> I spent most of the last couple of days killing two bugs that were a
> serious drag on my laptop, involving kacpid hogging
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:46:57 +0100, Sebastian Günther wrote:
> > qatom $(qlist -ICv) | awk '{print ">"$1"/"$2"-"$3"~"}'
> What i was wondering: Is there a reason why you split the qlist output
> into atoms, just to put it together the same way qlist has spitted it
> out?
>
> qlist -ICv | awk '
* Neil Bothwick (n...@digimed.co.uk) [12.03.09 10:49]:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:56:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > The atom syntax you want is ~ which means any -rN version
> > (including -r0) of the base version.
>
> I've only even seen the ~ used at the start of an atom, I didn't know it
>
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:55:32 -0400, Sean wrote:
> I don't think there's a real good way to accomplish this, but the
> approach I would take is to setup a local portage tree that the system
> syncs from. You could then cherry pick the ebuild updates that go into
> that local, and now customized, po
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Sean wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 13:40 -0700, Michael Higgins wrote:
>> Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a while,
>> yet allow package-rN updates...
>
> I don't think there's a real good way to accomplish this, but the
> appr
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 13:40 -0700, Michael Higgins wrote:
> Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a while,
> yet allow package-rN updates...
I don't think there's a real good way to accomplish this, but the
approach I would take is to setup a local portage tree that
Michael Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:51:05 +
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>
>> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:13:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>
Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is
going to bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be
up
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:51:05 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:13:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > > Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is
> > > going to bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be
> > > updated fairly regular. I been around Ge
On Thursday 12 March 2009 21:43:32 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> It didn't occur to me that when putting
> the tilde at the wrong end, you were talking out of the wrong end :)
I seem to be doing that a lot lately. You should have seen Tuesdays' blunder:
mysql> UPDATE passwds set passwd=, status="NEW", u
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:52:16 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I've only even seen the ~ used at the start of an atom, I didn't know
> > it could be used at the end too.
> You must be English. Only an Englishman could point out a blunder like
> that in such a subtle way as to make the other guy c
On Thursday 12 March 2009 11:48:48 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:56:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > The atom syntax you want is ~ which means any -rN version
> > (including -r0) of the base version.
>
> I've only even seen the ~ used at the start of an atom, I didn't know it
> co
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:13:30 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is going to
> > bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be updated fairly
> > regular. I been around Gentoo for years and I don't think I would
> > want to do this. I'm n
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:56:47 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> The atom syntax you want is ~ which means any -rN version
> (including -r0) of the base version.
I've only even seen the ~ used at the start of an atom, I didn't know it
could be used at the end too.
> You could grab a complete list of y
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote:
>
>
>> Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is going to
>> bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be updated fairly
>> regular. I been around Gentoo for years and I don't think I would want
>> to
On Thursday 12 March 2009 10:07:03 Dale wrote:
> Could he just not sync and call it a day? I suspect this is going to
> bite him one day tho. We know Gentoo likes to be updated fairly
> regular. I been around Gentoo for years and I don't think I would want
> to do this. I'm not sure how much e
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 22:40:54 Michael Higgins wrote:
>
>> Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a while,
>> yet allow package-rN updates...
>>
>
> This doesn't seem to be a built-in feature of portage after a quick scan of
> the man
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 22:40:54 Michael Higgins wrote:
> Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a while,
> yet allow package-rN updates...
This doesn't seem to be a built-in feature of portage after a quick scan of
the man pages. But I can think of a method to do i
Don't know the proper term, but I want to stop version updates for a while, yet
allow package-rN updates...
I spent most of the last couple of days killing two bugs that were a serious
drag on my laptop, involving kacpid hogging the CPU on a resume, or bay swap,
and gnome panel freezing on > 7
21 matches
Mail list logo
