Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-23 Thread Marco
[...]  You can try Wicd which is  a great network manager, until you are more familiar with gentoo/wifi configuration.  I have the same chip, with wpa2, wicd handless this without problems. This is cool! For the moment this is perfectly ok for me! Thanks for the tips!

[gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-22 Thread Marco
Hi all, I am trying to get my wireless adapter (Intel 3945ABG) running. following the instructions on http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Iwlwifi I compiled the kernel accordingly. Now the howto states: For kernel 2.6.27 and later, use the second slot(version 228.57.2.21) which needs to be unmasked

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-22 Thread Florian Philipp
Marco schrieb: Hi all, I am trying to get my wireless adapter (Intel 3945ABG) running. following the instructions on http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Iwlwifi I compiled the kernel accordingly. Now the howto states: For kernel 2.6.27 and later, use the second slot(version 228.57.2.21)

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-22 Thread Marco
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net wrote: Marco schrieb: [...] You somehow mixed iwl4965 and iwl3945. Version 228.57.2.21 belongs to iwl4965. If you really want iwl3945, you don't need to unmask/keyword anything. I'm on 2.6.28 with version

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-22 Thread Florian Philipp
Marco schrieb: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net wrote: Marco schrieb: [...] You somehow mixed iwl4965 and iwl3945. Version 228.57.2.21 belongs to iwl4965. If you really want iwl3945, you don't need to unmask/keyword anything. I'm on 2.6.28

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 2.6.27 and iwl3945-ucode

2009-04-22 Thread Alejandro
2009/4/22 Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net Marco schrieb: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Florian Philipp li...@f_philipp.fastmail.net wrote: Marco schrieb: [...] You somehow mixed iwl4965 and iwl3945. Version 228.57.2.21 belongs to iwl4965. If you really want