Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS make.conf variable being ignored?

On Fri, 2018-01-05 at 18:53 +, Grant Edwards wrote: > I haven't changed LINGUAS or L10N for ages, but I've noticed that > suddely other packages are being rebuild without linguas_en and > linguas_en_us. > > Is make.conf's LINGUAS variable no longer being expanded? Correct. See

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS make.conf variable being ignored?

On 01/05/2018 12:53 PM, Grant Edwards wrote: I tried to update today using my normal "emerge --sync; emerge -auvND world" sequence and it's failing when it gets to iso-codes: Emerging (1 of 1) app-text/iso-codes-3.75::gentoo * iso-codes-3.75.tar.xz BLAKE2B SHA512 size ;-) ...

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS make.conf variable being ignored?

I tried to update today using my normal "emerge --sync; emerge -auvND world" sequence and it's failing when it gets to iso-codes: >>> Emerging (1 of 1) app-text/iso-codes-3.75::gentoo * iso-codes-3.75.tar.xz BLAKE2B SHA512 size ;-) ...

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500, Dale wrote: > >>> The point of the news item is not to make it work now, it already >>> does. The advice is there to help you get your system into a state >>> where it won't stop working when the next stage of the switch occurs. >> I get

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Sat, 25 Jun 2016 09:57:57 -0500, Dale wrote: > > The point of the news item is not to make it work now, it already > > does. The advice is there to help you get your system into a state > > where it won't stop working when the next stage of the switch occurs. > I get that but that didn't make

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Mick wrote: > On Friday 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote: Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: >> I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to >> wasn't >> much

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was even >> more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point in reading >> it again so I went to the link, hoping it would be better. Well, not >>

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 -0500, Dale wrote: > I read the news item and was confused. I read it again and was even > more confused. After the third time, I didn't see any point in reading > it again so I went to the link, hoping it would be better. Well, not > really. So, I just started

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Friday 24 Jun 2016 18:47:11 Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote: > >> Peter Humphrey wrote: > >>> On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: > I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to > wasn't > much better either. In

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote: >> Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: >>> I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to wasn't much better either. In the end, I just fiddled with the setting until I

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Friday 24 Jun 2016 22:33:38 Alan McKinnon wrote: > ... all my posts in the last 30 minutes are redundant. Er... :-) -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On 24/06/2016 20:58, Dale wrote: Since Alan's post makes more sense to me than the docs, I added the L10N to make.conf and I got a clean output. So, that works. Mine is what Alan posted. I guess I'm ready for the future now.;-) And gmail helpfully delivered half my mail after me being out

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On 24/06/2016 22:09, Dale wrote: allan gottlieb wrote: On Fri, Jun 24 2016, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 24/06/2016 16:06, allan gottlieb wrote: Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to take. My

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On 24/06/2016 17:40, Dale wrote: Peter Humphrey wrote: On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to wasn't much better either. In the end, I just fiddled with the setting until I found a setting that didn't change what I already

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

allan gottlieb wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24 2016, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> On 24/06/2016 16:06, allan gottlieb wrote: >>> Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the >>> localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to >>> take. >>> >>> My systems are US

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/06/2016 16:06, allan gottlieb wrote: >> Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the >> localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to >> take. >> >> My systems are US English only >> >> /etc/portage/make.conf has >>

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Fri, Jun 24 2016, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 24/06/2016 16:06, allan gottlieb wrote: >> Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the >> localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to >> take. >> >> My systems are US English only >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: > >> I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to wasn't >> much better either. In the end, I just fiddled with the setting until I >> found a setting that didn't change what I already have, in other words, >>

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On 24/06/2016 16:06, allan gottlieb wrote: > Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the > localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to > take. > > My systems are US English only > > /etc/portage/make.conf has >LINGUAS="en" > > /etc/local.gen

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

On Friday 24 Jun 2016 09:54:35 Dale wrote: > I agree that the news item was confusing. The guide it linked to wasn't > much better either. In the end, I just fiddled with the setting until I > found a setting that didn't change what I already have, in other words, > I got a clean emerge -uvaDN

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

allan gottlieb wrote: > Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the > localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to > take. > > My systems are US English only > > /etc/portage/make.conf has >LINGUAS="en" > > /etc/local.gen has just comments plus >

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS, L10N, and local-gen

Having read the latest news article and rereading parts of the localization guide, it is not clear to me what action, if any, I need to take. My systems are US English only /etc/portage/make.conf has LINGUAS="en" /etc/local.gen has just comments plus en_US ISO-8859-1 en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Hi Francisco, On 2015-11-12 15:20, Francisco Ares wrote: > Is there a way for specifying particular "LINGUAS" for individual > packages? Sure there is. In fact, "LINGUAS=pt_BR" is just syntactical sugar for "USE=linguas_pt_BR". So for your specific case with tesseract, you would add a line to

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Hi, all. My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many applications now support native translations. And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no "pt_PT" (Portugal spoken Portuguese), for instance, neither any derivatives for other Portuguese speaking countries,

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS issue

Francisco Ares wrote: > Hi, all. > > My locale language is "pt_BR" (Brazilian Portuguese), and many > applications now support native translations. > > And there is the "pt" possible LINGUAS entry, and there is no "pt_PT" > (Portugal spoken Portuguese), for instance, neither

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

It's the official (as far as there is such a thing) place to store the list of gettext translations you want on your system, and most autotools-based builds and binary package managers also recognize it. I didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying! andrea

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS environment variable in make.conf. What has LINGUAS todo with make? I would expect

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Apparently, though unproven, at 13:48 on Thursday 19 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 19 August 2010 14:48, Elmar Hinz oss.el...@googlemail.com wrote: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Elmar Hinz oss.el...@googlemail.com writes: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS environment variable in make.conf.

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote: Elmar Hinz oss.el...@googlemail.com writes: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Even than, LINGUAS has rather to do with OpenOffice. Has it anything to do with portage at all? Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages which languages to include/support. When Portage

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 8/19/10, Elmar Hinz oss.el...@googlemail.com wrote: Even than, LINGUAS has rather to do with OpenOffice. Has it anything to do with portage at all? Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 8/19/10, Florian CROUZAT gen...@floriancrouzat.net wrote: On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote: Several packages, not just OpenOffice, can include/support different languages. Portage uses the value of LINGUAS to tell these packages which languages to include/support. I have

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:50:02 +0200, Elmar Hinz wrote about Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not portage specific. LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. It's used to control the compile-time inclusion of languages and/or locales for packages which have that kind of option (i.e. OpenOffice, KDE, Firefox and many others); as

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

No, I think you're mixing up compile-time and run-time values -- and also reading too much into the file names. make.conf should really rather be called portage.conf. That would make much more sense IMHO. :) As long as the source is the documentation, it should be possible by concept to

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

2010/8/19 Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net: On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not portage specific. LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. Really? Researching the web I understand it origins from gettext and portage has implemented it. If I understand right, it would

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 08/19/2010 05:37 AM, Florian CROUZAT wrote: On 19 août 2010, at 14:27, Graham Murray wrote: Elmar Hinz oss.el...@googlemail.com writes: 2010/8/18 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly:

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 08/19/2010 06:53 AM, Elmar Hinz wrote: 2010/8/19 Andrea Conti a...@alyf.net: On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not portage specific. LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. Really? Researching the web I understand it origins from gettext and portage has

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 8/19/2010 9:33 AM, Andrea Conti wrote: On the other hand LINGUAS is still a general variable AFAIK and not portage specific. LINGUAS is strictly portage-specific. It's used to control the compile-time inclusion of languages and/or locales for packages which have that kind of option (i.e.

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 8/19/2010 9:53 AM, Elmar Hinz wrote: But is the following generalization correct? * LINGUAS is the compile time setting (for multiple languages) * LANG is the runtime setting (for the current language). Yes, as long as you're aware that LINGUAS support is recommended, but optional. A

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS

The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS environment variable in make.conf. What has LINGUAS todo with make? I would expect it in rc.conf near the UNICODE setting. Al

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Apparently, though unproven, at 23:25 on Wednesday 18 August 2010, Elmar Hinz did opine thusly: The gentoo wiki suggests in different places to set the LINGUAS environment variable in make.conf. What has LINGUAS todo with make? I would expect it in rc.conf near the UNICODE setting. It

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Friday 23 May 2008, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:02:19 +0100, Mick wrote: Despite my LINGUAS settings I have noticed that kcontrol only shows US English under languages. Country Region allows me to select UK, but the only option that I have/can add under languages is US.

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Sat, 24 May 2008 07:17:35 +0100, Mick wrote: emerge kde-i18n Just as was ready to reply I already have I found out that I have not . . . Ha! I wonder if it should be a dependency of kdelibs if $LINGUAS is set to anything but en_US. -- Neil Bothwick We've all heard that a million

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

2008/5/22 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:13:44PM +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote: Does it matter in which order languages are emerged? Mplayer emerge says it uses the first one as the default language, and one firefox emerge showed all help menus etc in some non-English language.

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:02:19 +0100, Mick wrote: Despite my LINGUAS settings I have noticed that kcontrol only shows US English under languages. Country Region allows me to select UK, but the only option that I have/can add under languages is US. Spelling is en_US, although I would like to

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Monday 19 May 2008, Michał 'shpaq' Laszuk wrote: Dnia 2008-05-18, nie o godzinie 23:02 +0100, Graham Murray pisze: Michał 'shpaq' Laszuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The LINGUAS variable should be only en. en_US is a localization. In that case why do packages such as mozilla-firefox

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Mick wrote: Mine has been set to LINGUAS=en_GB el for many years now, but mplayer still shows up with scrambled characters on the terminal (aterm/rxvt). However, when rebuilt like: LINGUAS=en_US emerge -DV mplayer no more scrambled messages!

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Wednesday 21 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:26:58AM +0100, Mick wrote: Mine has been set to LINGUAS=en_GB el for many years now, but mplayer still shows up with scrambled characters on the terminal (aterm/rxvt). However, when rebuilt like:

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 03:13:44PM +0100, Uwe Thiem wrote: Does it matter in which order languages are emerged? Mplayer emerge says it uses the first one as the default language, and one firefox emerge showed all help menus etc in some non-English language. Wheteher anything else cares, I do

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:28:07 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LINGUAS is a system-wide setting, it does not make choices for individual users, but it does control their range of choice. Well, nice theory :-) but mplayer emerge says this -- LOG: setup For MPlayer's language

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On 19 May 2008, at 00:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... I have had bad luck with LINGUAS. I tried setting it to all the languages I knew of -- LINGUAS=en_US af ar az bg bn br bs ca cs cy da de el en_GB eo es et eu fa fi fr fy ga gl he hi hr hu is it ja km ko lt lv mk mn ms nb nds nl nn

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

Dnia 2008-05-18, nie o godzinie 23:02 +0100, Graham Murray pisze: Michał 'shpaq' Laszuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The LINGUAS variable should be only en. en_US is a localization. In that case why do packages such as mozilla-firefox support (amongst others) linguas_en, linguas_en_GB and

[gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

I only need English support, but USan English is preferred. I have in make.conf LINGUAS=en_US en thinking that if an app supports en_US that will be used since it's first. Is that the way it works? I guess this is just a trivia question -- I don't even know if there are apps which could use

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

Dnia 2008-05-18, nie o godzinie 15:07 -0500, »Q« pisze: ng that if an app supports en_US that will be used since it's first. Is that the way it works? The LINGUAS variable should be only en. en_US is a localization. -- Nie istnieje bariera nieskończenie ostateczna, Nie istnieje nic, co nie

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

Michał 'shpaq' Laszuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The LINGUAS variable should be only en. en_US is a localization. In that case why do packages such as mozilla-firefox support (amongst others) linguas_en, linguas_en_GB and linguas_en_US? They use the LINGUAS variable to select which localised

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:02:07PM +0100, Graham Murray wrote: Micha?? 'shpaq' Laszuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The LINGUAS variable should be only en. en_US is a localization. In that case why do packages such as mozilla-firefox support (amongst others) linguas_en, linguas_en_GB and

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:02:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is LINGUAS supposed to do? Tell portage which languages you want support for when building an application. It does not set the default language for that application, which is either handled by the locale environment variables or

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:22:45AM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:02:25 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is LINGUAS supposed to do? Tell portage which languages you want support for when building an application. It does not set the default language for that

Re: [gentoo-user] $LINGUAS question

On Sonntag, 18. Mai 2008, »Q« wrote: I only need English support, but USan English is preferred. I have in make.conf LINGUAS=en_US en thinking that if an app supports en_US that will be used since it's first. Is that the way it works? no. It installs the en_US and en language files. Set

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 7/29/06, Michael George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The docs I found on gentoo localization indicate that I can set LINGUAS in make.conf and build for just the languages I desire. I set it to: LINGUAS=en_US but all that does is prepend en_US to the beginning of the string above. Thanks to all

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Michael George schrieb: I am building OOo 2.0.3 and I happened to notice in the verbose emerge output that there is a long list of languages listed in the LINGUAS variable: LINGUAS=-af% -ar% -be_BY% -bg% -bn% -bs% -ca% -cs% -cy% -da% -de% -el% -en% -en_GB% -en_US% -en_ZA% -es% -et% -fa% -fi%

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

On 7/29/06, Michael George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The docs I found on gentoo localization indicate that I can set LINGUAS in make.conf and build for just the languages I desire. I set it to: LINGUAS=en_US but all that does is prepend en_US to the beginning of the string above. Look closer;

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Michael George wrote: LINGUAS=-af% -ar% -be_BY% -bg% -bn% -bs% -ca% -cs% -cy% -da% -de% -el% -en% -en_GB% -en_US% -en_ZA% -es% -et% -fa% -fi% -fr% -gu_IN% -he% -hi_IN% -hr% -hu% -it% -ja% -km% -ko% -lt% -mk% -nb% -nl% -nn% -nr% -ns% -pa_IN% -pl% -pt% -pt_BR% -ru% -rw% -sh_YU% -sk% -sl%

Re: [gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Michael George schrieb: On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: Michael George schrieb: I am building OOo 2.0.3 and I happened to notice in the verbose emerge output that there is a long list of languages listed in the LINGUAS variable: LINGUAS=-af% -ar% -be_BY% -bg%

[gentoo-user] LINGUAS

Matthias Bethke wrote: on Wednesday, 2006-04-05 at 14:50:29, you wrote: Just put LINGUAS=fr en. I'm unsure whether en-us is recognized. The Localization Guide isn't very clear about the syntax of these, nor how to get a list of available codes. I guess the basic ones are the two-letter