Am 16.06.2013 02:25, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Norman,
Sorry for the delayed response
What do you mean by replication?
Oh I was referring to the replication of the entire NFS server with virtual
drive images etc.. to other machines for fail over, maybe load balancing.
Kind Regards,
Hello Norman,
Sorry for the delayed response
What do you mean by replication?
Oh I was referring to the replication of the entire NFS server with virtual
drive images etc.. to other machines for fail over, maybe load balancing.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Anyone using Hadoop for managing virtual machines and/or drives.
Kind Regards,
Nick.
Hello Norman,
Thank you so much for your response, and that is an interesting setup.
we open up pools of up to 20 hosts which all mount the same NFS
share which holds sparse file images as virtual hdds of the
VM.
How are these sprase file images initially built for each VM's virtual hdd? And
Am 13.06.2013 14:31, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Norman,
Thank you so much for your response, and that is an interesting setup.
we open up pools of up to 20 hosts which all mount the same NFS
share which holds sparse file images as virtual hdds of the
VM.
How are these sprase file
On 12.06.2013 06:57, Norman Rieß wrote:
Am 11.06.2013 16:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they
compare to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber
san using IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind
Am 12.06.2013 08:33, schrieb Dan Johansson:
On 12.06.2013 06:57, Norman Rieß wrote:
Am 11.06.2013 16:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they
compare to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber
san using
Hello Nick,
the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
need a fibre channel SAN.
Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault tolerance.
An example, you have an hicup or a power failure
On 12/06/2013 16:20, Nick Khamis wrote:
It was my understanding that SAN whether implemented using iSCSI
or Fibre was essentially susceptible to the same type
of faults that lead to whatever failures?
Old cynic speaking here:
Yes, they both have the same weak point: humans.
In my experience
Hello,
I tend to disagree. A correctly designed SAN (using dual Fabric among
other things) is a lot more stable and has a lot better performance than
any NAS (NFS, CIFS, iSCSI) solution. One other thing that also needs to
be correctly configured to have a stable SAN infrastructure is the
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.comwrote:
Old cynic speaking here:
Yes, they both have the same weak point: humans.
In my experience the only storage technology that ever let me down badly
was a decrepit Arena locally-attached badly designed POS.
The
Am 12.06.2013 16:20, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Nick,
the question is, what are you doing with it and why do you think you
need a fibre channel SAN.
Our goal indeed is to get rid of the SAN infrastructure as it is
delicately to all kinds of failure with nearly zero fault
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they compare
to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber san using
IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind of luck people where having
using this approach, or any for that matter.
Kind
Am 11.06.2013 16:19, schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone,
Was wondering what people are running these days, and how do they
compare to the 10,000 dollar SAN boxes. We are looking to build a fiber
san using IET and glusterFS, and was wondering what kind of luck people
where having using this
14 matches
Mail list logo
