Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A friend of mine does this for his production servers:
1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
2/ disables loadable modules completely
This is probably not suitable for some use cases...(new
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be better
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
2/ disables loadable modules completely
But Why? What's the benefit?
Well, disabling loadable modules is
On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:21:17 +0200
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1/ builds the known needed things into the kernel
2/ disables loadable modules
On Tuesday 15 May 2007, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re:
[gentoo-user] Managing my kernel':
On Tue, 15 May 2007 09:21:17 +0200
Etaoin Shrdlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 03:57, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be better
to build
On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm
Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might
On Mon, 14 May 2007 18:09:37 +0200
Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Montag, 14. Mai 2007, Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my
kernel. I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I
only enable things as I need them. I
On Tue, 15 May 2007 00:37:57 +0200, Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
Gentoo is actually all about keeping all of the stuff as minimal as
possible ;)
Gentoo is all about doing what you want, not what other people think you
should do. It doesn't matter whether you want all modules, all in-kernel,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:16:04 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 00:37:57 +0200, Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
Gentoo is actually all about keeping all of the stuff as minimal as
possible ;)
Gentoo is all about doing what you want, not what other people
Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my kernel.
I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I only
enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from the
kernel at all.
Is there a better way to go? I'm starting to think it might be
On Tue, 15 May 2007 12:33:22 +1200
Mark Kirkwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
I've been puzzling a bit lately over the best way to manage my
kernel. I've always tried to keep it as minimal as possible, and I
only enable things as I need them. I also don't build modules from
the
13 matches
Mail list logo
