I've had this come up a few times over the last few weeks. Every time
I've done the command the emerge has failed somewhere along the way.
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
Granted, I have no way of knowing whether
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
It allows the affected packages to continue working until the rebuild is
done. With the 'old' revdep-rebuild, a program using a library whose
version
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
breakage in the first place.
--
Neil Bothwick
Use the Force, Luke,
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com writes:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
It allows the affected packages to continue working until the rebuild is
On Donnerstag 08 Januar 2009, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
breakage in the
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
@preserved-rebuild aren't necessarily to be followed, or at least not
worried about if they fail as whatever program needs the libraries
still has the old versions?
They should
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't
rebuilding since the emerge step fails.
It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer libraries.
What to do? Just sit and wait until someone updates something
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
@preserved-rebuild aren't necessarily to be followed, or at least not
worried about if they fail as
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:53:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
OK, so the programs aren't broken but in my case the libs aren't
rebuilding since the emerge step fails.
It's the programs that need to be rebuilt, against the newer
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:51:32 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
I guess then that the constant messages about doing an emerge
@preserved-rebuild aren't
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild want
to do different things. revdep-rebuild is rebuilding nss which may or
may not fail. @preserved-rebuild wanted to rebuild eveolution which
did
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and revdep-rebuild want
to do different things. revdep-rebuild is rebuilding nss which may or
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:07 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
Right now I'm seeing that @preserved-rebuild and
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by /usr/lib64/nss/libnss3.so.11,
not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: libsoftokn3.so.11, needed by
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Ausmus
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Mark Knecht
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:36 AM, James Ausmus
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 05:47:15PM +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:20:00 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Is this adding some value that I don't understand? What does it do
that using revdep-rebuild doesn't?
revdep-rebuild fixes broken packages, @preserved-libs prevents the
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
NIP
a ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*?
lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
/usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
/usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.12
lightning ~ #
Aha! And which of the versioned .so's
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
NIP
a ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*?
lightning ~ # ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*
/usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so /usr/lib/nss/libnss3.so.11
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:21 PM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:02 PM, James Ausmus james.aus...@gmail.com
wrote:
NIP
a ls /usr/lib/nss/libnss3*?
lightning ~ # ls
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I actually did an emerge -ef world already just to ensure everything
is here. I'm considering the emerge -C nss, remove any links left over
by hand, and then emerging evolution again and letting it pull it in
and
25 matches
Mail list logo
