Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-16 Thread Sergio Polini
Bo Ørsted Andresen: Look at the first section at the GWN from the 16. of January [1]. Also this (autouse) has recently been added to the release notes of portage 2.1 [2] (they forgot until now). Thanks! I didn't subscribe to the GWN. My fault ;-) Sergio -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-15 Thread Sergio Polini
Mick: As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your /etc/make.conf, or if you only

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-15 Thread Rumen Yotov
Sergio Polini wrote: Mick: As I understand it (I'm sure this has been covered in GWN, forums, etc.) USE flags which had been set automatically by certain packages are no longer valid universally. Therefore, either add those USE flags missing (e.g. ldap mozilla for OOo) in your

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-15 Thread Mick
On 15/06/06, Rumen Yotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is because of a new USE-flag -curl* which previously was ON. Means you'll have to reemerge xine-ui or enable 'curl' for xine-ui in package.use. Or add curl in your /etc/make.conf to apply it across all packages, or add:

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 15 June 2006 21:55, Sergio Polini wrote: I'm sure (I'ld like to be sure) that this change is documented somewhere, but I can't find where. I need documentation because I'm an advanced user of some packages (f.i., tetex), but a naive user of other ones (f.i., xine). So I can't

[gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Kristian Poul Herkild
Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: OUTPUT from emerge --pretend --update --deep --newuse world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating world dependencies... done! [ebuild R ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread b.n.
Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: OUTPUT from emerge --pretend --update --deep --newuse world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Try without the

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Mick
On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to Portage seems quite

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Teresa and Dale
Mick wrote: On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Kristian Poul Herkild
Mick wrote: On 11/06/06, Kristian Poul Herkild [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... after having updated to portage 2.1 which has become stable, I get this weird output from emerge and revdep-rebuild: [snip . . . ] Recompiling that much (especially OpenOffice) just because of an update to

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Kristian Poul Herkild
Teresa and Dale wrote: Well, I noticed that when I ran revdep-rebuild -p mine wanted to reemerge gcc too, so I let it. Then I went back and ran revdep-rebuild again and it still wants to reemerge gcc. I did the next thing I could think of and did a emerge -e system. When I ran

Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.1 weirdness

2006-06-11 Thread Richard Fish
On 6/11/06, Teresa and Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Same as the OP, why does it want to go in circles reemerging gcc?? :-/ http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org/msg34390.html -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list