Am Sun, 17 Sep 2017 08:20:50 -0500
schrieb Dan Douglas :
> On 09/17/2017 04:17 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:20:45 -0500
> > schrieb Dan Douglas :
> >
> >> On 09/16/2017 07:06 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> [...]
> [...]
> >> [...]
>
On 09/17/2017 04:17 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:20:45 -0500
> schrieb Dan Douglas :
>
>> On 09/16/2017 07:06 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>> Am Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:28:49 -0400
>>> schrieb Rich Freeman :
>>>
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM,
Am Sun, 17 Sep 2017 01:20:45 -0500
schrieb Dan Douglas :
> On 09/16/2017 07:06 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:28:49 -0400
> > schrieb Rich Freeman :
> >
> >> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Kai Krakow
> >> wrote:
>
On 09/16/2017 07:06 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:28:49 -0400
> schrieb Rich Freeman :
>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Kai Krakow
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> At least in btrfs there's also a caveat that the original extents
>>> may not actually
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Sep 2017 10:05:21 -0700
> schrieb Rich Freeman :
>
>>
>> My main concern with xfs/ext4 is that neither provides on-disk
>> checksums or protection against the raid write hole.
>
> Btrfs suffers
Am Sat, 16 Sep 2017 10:05:21 -0700
schrieb Rich Freeman :
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Kai Krakow
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I'm running across 3x 1TB here on my desktop, with mraid1
> > and draid 0. Combined with bcache it gives confident
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>
> Actually, I'm running across 3x 1TB here on my desktop, with mraid1 and
> draid 0. Combined with bcache it gives confident performance.
>
Not entirely sure I'd use the word "confident" to describe a
filesystem where the
Am Sat, 16 Sep 2017 09:39:33 -0400
schrieb Rich Freeman :
> On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Kai Krakow
> wrote:
> >
> > But I guess that btrfs doesn't use 10G sized extents? And I also
> > guess, this is where autodefrag jumps in.
> >
>
> It definitely
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>
> But I guess that btrfs doesn't use 10G sized extents? And I also guess,
> this is where autodefrag jumps in.
>
It definitely doesn't use 10G extents considering the chunks are only
1GB. (For those who aren't aware,
Am Fri, 15 Sep 2017 14:28:49 -0400
schrieb Rich Freeman :
> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Kai Krakow
> wrote:
> >
> > At least in btrfs there's also a caveat that the original extents
> > may not actually be split and the split extents share parts of the
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Kai Krakow wrote:
>
> At least in btrfs there's also a caveat that the original extents may
> not actually be split and the split extents share parts of the
> original extent. That means, if you delete the original later, the copy
> will
Am Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:46:27 +0200
schrieb Helmut Jarausch :
> Hi,
>
> sorry, this question is not Gentoo specific - but I know there are
> many very knowledgeable people on this list.
>
> I'd like to "hard-link" a file X to Y - i.e. there is no additional
> space on disk
12 matches
Mail list logo