[gentoo-user] Re: --jobs is ignored for unmerging?

2014-02-21 Thread eroen
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:14:00 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: I recently needed to unmerge Netbeans and KDE from a machine. So removed the top-level packages of those, and then ran: emerge -a --depclean --jobs 20 However, --jobs is being ignored. So I'm sitting there,

[gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:55:38 -0600 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Under the newest portage with x86~, if I run `emerge -vuD world' should I see something besides: Jobs 0 of 71 complete, 1 running [...] Shouldn't there be more jobs

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: This is a brand new install, and I've changed very little.  I've done nothing consciously to effect how many jobs are to be run. In that case I think it is working normally. It won't run more than 1 job unless you ask it to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:46:15 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: If its only going to do the jobs one by one, then why cover the -v output? So that you can see at a glance where emerge is up to. 15 of 71 tells me far more than gcc output flashing by too fast to read, so I have to use an external

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Claudio Roberto França Pereira
-v has nothing to do with quiet-build. You want to use --quiet-build=N. Also, emerge parallelization depends on the -j (--jobs) option, you should use emerge --jobs N other_options atoms. In your case, a -j7 should do the trick.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: Alan McKinnonalan.mckin...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:55:38 -0600 Harry Putnamrea...@newsguy.com wrote: Under the newest portage with x86~, if I run `emerge -vuD world' should I see something besides: Jobs 0 of 71 complete, 1 running [...] Shouldn't

[gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: This is a brand new install, and I've changed very little.  I've done nothing consciously to effect how many jobs are to be run. In that case I think it is working

[gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Harry Putnam
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Under the newest portage with x86~, if I run `emerge -vuD world' should I see something besides: Jobs 0 of 71 complete, 1 running [...] Shouldn't there be more jobs

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Dec 8, 2011 7:21 AM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes: On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote: This is a brand new install, and I've changed very little. I've done nothing consciously to effect how

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: --jobs

2011-12-07 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:09:39 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: I followed another thread recently about this, and I understood the new behavior is set this way because emerge will be running more than 1 job and that would be a mess to put into one terminal... hence the line showing jobs. No, the