Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 17/09/2014 07:46, Hans de Graaff wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts. >> Not so much for ~20 or so. Plus puppet's language and configs get large >> and hard to keep track of - lots and lots of

[gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-16 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts. > Not so much for ~20 or so. Plus puppet's language and configs get large > and hard to keep track of - lots and lots of directory trees with many > things mentioning othe

[gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef

2014-09-16 Thread James
Alec Ten Harmsel alectenharmsel.com> writes: > We use bcfg2, and all I can say is to stay away. XML abuse runs rampant > in bcfg2. From what I've heard from other professional sysadmins, Puppet > is the favorite, but that's mostly conjecture. Hi Alec! > > Anyone here used ansible > > What are