[gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
meino.cra...@gmx.dewrote: > > Q: How can I direct the emerged NoScript to be > inserted into PaleMoon Profiles With correct USE-flags (BROWSER=palemoon) the ebuild installs noscript into the _system_ directory where palemoon looks for plugins. No user profiles are touched. I am not sure how user profiles and system directories interact if you have already installed a different (wrong) version of noscript in your user profiles. You might need to find a way to remove it...
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Martin Vaeth[17-01-17 02:49]: >> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >>> Martin Vaeth [17-01-16 18:22]: meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > I still cant use NoScript with PaleMoon. Check out the mv overlay: There is a slot working with palemoon. >>> Did that but cannot determine, what has changed... >> I don't understand the question. >> BROWSER=palemoon emerge www-plugins/noscript:0::mv >> and you should have installed a version of noscript >> which works with palemoon. >> >> > A! NOW I got it! > ...I thought on a total different way of haveing > another, implementation of palemoon itsself!!! > > Q: How can I direct the emerged NoScript to be > inserted into PaleMoon Profiles (and how to > choose the correct profile) instead of being > inserted into firefox's profiles? > Or is it "download that file" only and I have to > load it into Palemoon by hand? > > Cheers and thanks for your help in advance! > Meino > > I've never done this but read where someone else did a good while back. If you restart Palemoon, I think it just sees it and loads it. I'm not 100% sure on that but I think that's how it works. I've read that is how Firefox, Seamonkey does with LastPass too. One can use the addon part of the browser or emerge it with the same result. Hope that helps, if not, maybe Martin or someone else has a 100% sure method. Dale :-) :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
Martin Vaeth[17-01-17 02:49]: > meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > Martin Vaeth [17-01-16 18:22]: > >> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > >> > I still cant use NoScript with PaleMoon. > >> > >> Check out the mv overlay: There is a slot working with palemoon. > > > > Did that but cannot determine, what has changed... > > I don't understand the question. > BROWSER=palemoon emerge www-plugins/noscript:0::mv > and you should have installed a version of noscript > which works with palemoon. > > A! NOW I got it! ...I thought on a total different way of haveing another, implementation of palemoon itsself!!! Q: How can I direct the emerged NoScript to be inserted into PaleMoon Profiles (and how to choose the correct profile) instead of being inserted into firefox's profiles? Or is it "download that file" only and I have to load it into Palemoon by hand? Cheers and thanks for your help in advance! Meino
[gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
meino.cra...@gmx.dewrote: > Martin Vaeth [17-01-16 18:22]: >> meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >> > I still cant use NoScript with PaleMoon. >> >> Check out the mv overlay: There is a slot working with palemoon. > > Did that but cannot determine, what has changed... I don't understand the question. BROWSER=palemoon emerge www-plugins/noscript:0::mv and you should have installed a version of noscript which works with palemoon.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
Martin Vaeth[17-01-16 18:22]: > meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > > I still cant use NoScript with PaleMoon. > > Check out the mv overlay: There is a slot working with palemoon. > > Did that but cannot determine, what has changed... May be a complete dumb question...but what shoyld have changed in doing so? Cheers Meino
[gentoo-user] Re: Configuring Firefox for more privacy - an attempt (results)
meino.cra...@gmx.dewrote: > I still cant use NoScript with PaleMoon. Check out the mv overlay: There is a slot working with palemoon.