- Original Message -
From: Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Openoffice being replaced?
On 2011-07-29, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 PM, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
All I'm saying is that I want to stick with the Apache OOo in the long run,
not LibreOffice.
Grant's point (if I read it correctly) was that you were effectively
using LO, just with
On 2011-08-01, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
I would say switch to LibreOffice and don't look back. :)
I wouldn't. While LibreOffice may have some advances at the moment,
I'm still interested in following main-line OOo - now being setting
under Apache.
So you don't use the gentoo
On 2011-07-29, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Openoffice being replaced?
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 03:25:48PM -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
On my machine, it took this:
root@fireball / # genlop -t libreoffice
* app-office/libreoffice
Thu Jul 28 12:33:11 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.3.1
merge time: 1 hour, 9 minutes and 33 seconds.
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
But if you emerge something and it has to be fetched first, is that
counted in the time genlop shows or not? That is the question. I
don't think it is counted but I'm not sure.
That's what I thought, too, but then I simply tried to
On Friday 29 Jul 2011 13:07:35 YoYo Siska wrote:
Here is mine:
Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
Do those merge times include download time?
Mick wrote:
On Friday 29 Jul 2011 13:07:35 YoYo Siska wrote:
Here is mine:
Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
Do those merge times include download time? I
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
But if you emerge something and it has to be fetched first, is that
counted in the time genlop shows or not? That is the question. I
don't think it is counted but I'm not sure.
That's what
On 2011-07-28, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I didn't pay much attention.
and on at least two machines I'll have to move to binary.
A few
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-07-28, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I didn't pay much attention.
My build took about 3.3Gbs of
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2011-07-28, Mickmichaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
All sounds good, except that libreoffice requires acres of space to
emerge
Is it any worse that OOo was?
Both took hours, but beyond that, I
Paul Hartman wrote:
Here is mine:
Wed May 25 10:07:18 2011 app-office/libreoffice-3.3.2
merge time: 34 minutes and 10 seconds.
On my Intel Core i7 920 with 12GB of RAM using tmpfs. :)
Do those merge times include download time? I wonder...
I have wondered that too.
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonly blah first, then start the real work.
--
Rgds
Peter Linux Counter 5290,
Peter Humphrey writes:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonly blah first, then start the real work.
I have acron job
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonlyblah first, then start the real work.
But if you
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge
Dale writes:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge --fetchonlyblah first, then start the real work.
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 28 July 2011 21:48:15 Dale wrote:
I have wondered that too. The process is sort of started but it's not
actually compiling either. I wonder how we could know for sure?
Easy. emerge
19 matches
Mail list logo
