On 11/04/2017 00:28, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 10 Apr 2017 12:26:38 Dale wrote:
>
>> I have Gkrellm on my parking desktop. That's the desktop I'm usually on
>> when I'm not doing anything. At a glance, I can see what the CPUs are
>> doing, memory, disks, fans and a whole host of other
On Monday 10 Apr 2017 12:26:38 Dale wrote:
> I have Gkrellm on my parking desktop. That's the desktop I'm usually on
> when I'm not doing anything. At a glance, I can see what the CPUs are
> doing, memory, disks, fans and a whole host of other things. I can't see
> me going without Gkrellm.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 00:58, Kai Krakow wrote:
>>> Oh, and have a look at gkrellm and its plugins. It might have all you
>>> want already and then some :)
>> No, I hate that. See above. Too overwhelmin, too distracting, and
>> either it steals screen real estate or isn't visible
On 10/04/2017 00:58, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> Oh, and have a look at gkrellm and its plugins. It might have all you
>> want already and then some :)
> No, I hate that. See above. Too overwhelmin, too distracting, and
> either it steals screen real estate or isn't visible anyways and thus
> no need to
Am Mon, 10 Apr 2017 18:17:36 +0200
schrieb Helmut Jarausch :
> And here is what I get (I have summed up all 'visible' memory that
> top would have shown)
> And please, compare this to what I see as memory usage.
Did you put the 'virtual' column into your calculation?
If yes,
Am Sun, 9 Apr 2017 23:40:15 +0200
schrieb David Haller :
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
> >Am Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:09:23 +0200
> >schrieb David Haller :
> >
> >> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> Tell us, why
Hello,
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
>Am Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:09:23 +0200
>schrieb David Haller :
>
>> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
>> >For me, it was a runaway upower process some months ago. I'm using
>> >systemd, so I fixed it easily with the following
Am Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:09:23 +0200
schrieb David Haller :
> On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
> >For me, it was a runaway upower process some months ago. I'm using
> >systemd, so I fixed it easily with the following drop-in:
>
> Tell us, why exactly would one need upower
Hello,
On Sun, 09 Apr 2017, Kai Krakow wrote:
>For me, it was a runaway upower process some months ago. I'm using
>systemd, so I fixed it easily with the following drop-in:
Tell us, why exactly would one need upower again, anyway?
-dnh
--
Love your enemies: they'll go crazy trying to figure
Am Sat, 8 Apr 2017 23:55:29 +0200
schrieb Alan McKinnon :
> > Adding up all terms except 'tot' I get 5.6G where are the remaining
> > 2G? And why is shmem 0.85G - I have even seen a value of 4G for
> > shmem although all tempfs filesystems
> > were nearly empty.
>
>
Am Sat, 08 Apr 2017 21:33:20 +0200
schrieb Helmut Jarausch :
> Hi,
>
> since a few days my system eats up memory, uses SWAP space and gets
> slow.
> It might depend on xorg-server, but I don't know why.
>
> On a nearly idle system (except xorg-server and some XTerms) I
11 matches
Mail list logo