Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-12 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:28 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick wrote: > > kde-base/knetworkconf > >selected: 4.4.5 > > protected: none > > omitted: none > > > > Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version. Has it been > > replaced by something

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-12 Thread Mick
On 12 May 2011 06:31, Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote: >> > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being >> > called up >> > >> > for removal: >> >   sys-apps/dmidecode >> > >> >      selected: 2

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-11 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 23:26:18 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote: > > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being > > called up > > > > for removal: > > sys-apps/dmidecode > > > > selected: 2.10 > > > > protected: none > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-11 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mick wrote: > kde-base/knetworkconf >    selected: 4.4.5 >   protected: none >     omitted: none > > Is asking to be removed, but there isn't a 4.6 version.  Has it been replaced > by something else? It was replaced by knetworkmanager

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-11 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/12/2011 12:28 AM, Mick wrote: Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called up for removal: sys-apps/dmidecode selected: 2.10 protected: none omitted: none I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forgot about it? Do you

[gentoo-user] Re: depclean after kde-4.6 upgrade

2011-05-11 Thread Mick
On Wednesday 11 May 2011 22:28:22 you wrote: > Having completed the upgrade I noticed that a few packages are being called > up for removal: > > sys-apps/dmidecode > selected: 2.10 >protected: none > omitted: none > > I can't think of it being a dependency - did I emerge it and forg