Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:44:43 +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2013 14:11, Marc Joliet wrote: Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:59 +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Martin Vaeth
Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote: One of those questions stands out to me right now: the one on understandable error messages. As some recent posts to this ML demonstrate, it seems to be one area where portage is visibly falling (staying?) behind right now. They remind me of the type of error

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 06/11/2013 09:46, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You don't have to keep explaining subslots to me But not every reader knows the details - this is not a private conversation. Then please start your own thread on the matter and describe it all in the OP

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 06/11/2013 14:54, Martin Vaeth wrote: Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de wrote: One of those questions stands out to me right now: the one on understandable error messages. As some recent posts to this ML demonstrate, it seems to be one area where portage is visibly falling (staying?) behind right

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/11/2013 09:46, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You don't have to keep explaining subslots to me But not every reader knows the details - this is not a private conversation. Then please [...] describe it

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-06 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/11/2013 14:54, Martin Vaeth wrote: (I am guessing this only from the outputs which are posted): When portage detects that it cannot resolve something after backtracking, it dies. That by itself is good info. The conflict that portage

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You know what? I'm not convinced. What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal with a problem that is not the general case. I find it funny that perhaps you did not realize that you repeated the main argument *in favour

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Tuesday 05 Nov 2013 10:52:36 Martin Vaeth wrote: Note, however, in the long run: The process of transforming all packages to subslot dependencies is not yet complete. I guess it will take many years until it is: Up to some corner cases you can check whether the process is complete for your

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You know what? I'm not convinced. What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal with a problem that is not the general case. I find it funny that perhaps you did not realize

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:59 +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You know what? I'm not convinced. What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal with a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/11/2013 14:11, Marc Joliet wrote: Am Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:14:59 +0200 schrieb Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com: On 05/11/2013 11:52, Martin Vaeth wrote: Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You know what? I'm not convinced. What I'm seeing is a rather large towering

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Bruce Hill
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:44:43PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: I too see your viewpoint, as you see mine. There's nothing wrong with your logic within the narrow domain of making the code that implements this specific feature (subslots) work correctly per spec. Background: I'm a Linux

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: It seems to me that you didn't read the whole post fully, and have cherry-picked a part that you think bolsters your position. I do not think that I have a position here. Subslots solve some problem. If they cause inconveniences like portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/11/2013 17:21, Bruce Hill wrote: That is good practice, to say the least. Wish it would happen in Gentoo. But then again, may I ask, do you have as many devs and as many pkgs that must co-exist on so many differently configured machines? Not even close :-) What we lack in package

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/11/2013 20:06, Martin Vaeth wrote: I predict once a week fallout from sub-slots induced bugs that was intended to fix once a year problem. Let's see: Forgetting to bump a subslot means that the purpose of subslots for that package fails. A problem, but not worse than without subslots.

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-05 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: You don't have to keep explaining subslots to me But not every reader knows the details - this is not a private conversation. What I have maintained all along is that I don't see the solution as tested to be production-ready It has been in ~arch

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-03 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 17:38:00 -0700, walt wrote: I have no facts to device either way. snip but lets the user device when to do them. Neil, are you using a new auto-complete function of some kind? Yes, it's called sleep deprivation :( -- Neil Bothwick We can't solve problems by

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-03 Thread Martin Vaeth
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: No, no problem whatsoever. emerge @preserved -rebuild is my preferred method, I find it vastly superior to sub-slot operators which It is neither superior nor inferior. It is an unrelated mechanism which will have less to do once subslot

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-03 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/03/2013 08:07 PM, Martin Vaeth wrote: If you want my opinion on subslots: # grep EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS /etc/portage/make.conf EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--ignore-built-slot-operator-deps=y A different user interface would be preferrable: Something

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
You know what? I'm not convinced. What I'm seeing is a rather large towering edifice of complexity to deal with a problem that is not the general case. I'm seeing something that has all the hallmarks of a solution that whilst likely to be mathematically correct, is dreamed up by young

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-03 Thread Martin Vaeth
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--ignore-built-slot-operator-deps=y A different user interface would be preferrable [...] Could you open a bug report for portage and make a properly formulated proposal about this? Done. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490350

[gentoo-user] Re: do subslots improve user-experience?

2013-11-02 Thread walt
On 11/02/2013 02:26 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: I have no facts to device either way. snip but lets the user device when to do them. Neil, are you using a new auto-complete function of some kind?