On Dec 13, 2011 12:25 a.m., Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:03 PM, James Broadhead
jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it happen to be a 2TB USB drive? I remember reading about
problems with some of those. It works in Windows with the factory
On 2011-12-13, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:03:32AM +, James Broadhead wrote
So on returning to this machine, I see that another USB disk that I
have connected to it is also having those messages printed about it.
This leads me to suspect that it's
On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
ext4: fill_buffer on unknown block BLOCKID out of range
Apologies; the correct message is:
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device sdb1
This appears 42 times immediately following
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James Broadhead
jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
ext4: fill_buffer on unknown block BLOCKID out of range
Apologies; the correct message is:
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block
Am 12.12.2011 21:33, schrieb James Broadhead:
On 12 December 2011 14:14, James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
ext4: fill_buffer on unknown block BLOCKID out of range
Apologies; the correct message is:
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device
I've looked at the kernel code that causes the error message. It
verifies that this is most likely a dead disk:
It would be worth running smartctl from smartmontools to see what it
knows of the disks status.
On 12 December 2011 20:55, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:33 PM, James Broadhead
jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
Apologies; the correct message is:
grow_buffers: requested out-of-range block 18446744072382021139 for device
sdb1
This appears 42
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 6:03 PM, James Broadhead
jamesbroadh...@gmail.com wrote:
Does it happen to be a 2TB USB drive? I remember reading about
problems with some of those. It works in Windows with the factory
partition/FAT tables because of tricks they do to the addressing that
works in
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:03:32AM +, James Broadhead wrote
So on returning to this machine, I see that another USB disk that I
have connected to it is also having those messages printed about it.
This leads me to suspect that it's either an ext4 bug or the situation
that you mentioned
9 matches
Mail list logo
