Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: > Dale writes: > >> What was supposed to be attached again? ;-) >> >> Dale > hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the > attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments > are allowed... > > Here is it is inline: > > ---

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Dale writes: > What was supposed to be attached again? ;-) > > Dale hehe... after noticing my `senior moment, I did repost to include the attachement ... I don't see it on the group, perhaps no attachments are allowed... Here is it is inline: --- --- ---=--- ---

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Harry Putnam writes: > For your information: Attached is message from the lxde devel gmane > group from Jonathan Thibault . Whoops forgot to attach Jonathan's message: >From nobody Wed Dec 17 12:33:39 2014 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonathan Thibault Newsgroups: gmane.comp.deskto

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Raffaele BELARDI writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: >> Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu >> item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem >> to imply. >> >> You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo. >> So do you see the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Dale
Harry Putnam wrote: > James writes: > >> Harry Putnam newsguy.com> writes: >> >> >>> James tampabay.rr.com> writes: lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] >>> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to >>> the question. >> >> OK, if t

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Harry Putnam
James writes: > Harry Putnam newsguy.com> writes: > > >> James tampabay.rr.com> writes: >> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] >> > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] >> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to >> the question. > > > OK, if that is true, who is answering

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Raffaele BELARDI
Harry Putnam wrote: > Its only on gentoo that I ran into this problem with the `run' menu > item, so I know for certain it is not a general breakage as you seem > to imply. > > You mentioned that you are using lxde... I'm assuming, on gentoo. > So do you see the same problem with the `run' item on

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-17 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > James writes: >> >> OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, which >> I am still using? I have lots of breakage on lxde; I do not bother >> fixing. I'm working on migrating to lxqt. Good luck with lxde. > > Not sure I fol

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread Harry Putnam
James writes: > Harry Putnam newsguy.com> writes: > > >> James tampabay.rr.com> writes: >> > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] >> > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] >> Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to >> the question. > > OK, if that is true, who is answering

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread James
Harry Putnam newsguy.com> writes: > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] > > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] > Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to > the question. OK, if that is true, who is answering your questions on lxde, whic

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread Harry Putnam
James writes: > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] > > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] Sounds like propaganda rather rather than any sort of answer to the question.

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread James
Michael Vetter uni-konstanz.de> writes: > > lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] > LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people > who also developed LXDE. [3] Yes, the tenor has changed over the months to keep the base of users in tact. But, if you read the 'tea leaves'

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread Michael Vetter
> lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] > > lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] > [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/ > [2] http://lxqt.org/ LXDE is still in development, LXQt is just a new project by some people who also developed LXDE. [3] > When pressing the all important

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread James
James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > You may want to read the entire bug there on the remaining > issues with lxqt-8. From what I gather there are problems > upgradeing an existing lxde setup; but installing lxqt 8.0 or > 1.0 as a fresh install is working for most. ymmv. Oops, Forgot the BGO ref

[gentoo-user] Re: new install using lxdeL no `run' cmd

2014-12-16 Thread James
Harry Putnam newsguy.com> writes: > After installing piles of X related pkgs including all the lxde pkgs: > Any ideas? lxde is deprecated, imho. [1] lxqt is the future of that lineage [2] [1] http://sourceforge.net/p/lxde/mailman/message/32927295/ [2] http://lxqt.org/ You may want to rea