Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:23:23 + (UTC), Grant Edwards wrote: Build time is coming down I see. The first time I build OOo (on a 686 amd) it took 12 hours. Now I get similar to you - 2h14 On some of my machines it still takes 12+ hours. OOo 3 builds faster than 2.4. 1h40 vs 2h45 on my desktop, but took slightly longer on my Eee 10h45 :( -- Neil Bothwick Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 081019 Grant Edwards wrote: On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 GB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). The first time I build OOo (on a 686 amd) it took 12 hours. Now I get similar to you - 2h14 On some of my machines it still takes 12+ hours. On my back-up machine (AMD 2500+ , memory 1 GB : 2003), 2.4.1 took 5 hr . My everyday box (Core 2 Duo 2650 , memory 2 GB (faster FSB) : 2007), OO 2.4.1 took 2 h 14 m , so 3.0.0 is a bit more time-consuming; the download is much more: 346 MB against c 200 MB (that doesn't include the wretched Xulrunner: 75 MB15 m to compile). I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed 3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using). On my system (Core 2 Duo E6600, overclocked to 3GHz) my OOo times were: Tue Aug 19 20:47:26 2008 app-office/openoffice-2.4.1 merge time: 2 hours, 43 minutes and 43 seconds. Fri Oct 17 21:22:31 2008 app-office/openoffice-3.0.0 merge time: 1 hour, 33 minutes and 40 seconds. So the 3.0.0 compile is definitely faster by a lot for me. In 2.4.1 I was able to use my 4 gig /dev/shm for my portage_tmpdir, but for 3.0.0 i had to comment out and use disk for temporary files. Maybe it could have been even faster. Thanks, Paul
[gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 MB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). It opened my usual spreadsheets word-processing files correctly, but the toolbar needs attention tomorrow. Download is 346 MB . Build time is coming down I see. The first time I build OOo (on a 686 amd) it took 12 hours. Now I get similar to you - 2h14 On some of my machines it still takes 12+ hours. -- Grant
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
081019 Grant Edwards wrote: On 2008-10-19, Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 07:25:28 Philip Webb wrote: OO 3.0.0 compiled successfully in 2 h 29 m on this Core2 Duo machine, but needed 5,3 GB temporary disk space (ok here, but others beware). The first time I build OOo (on a 686 amd) it took 12 hours. Now I get similar to you - 2h14 On some of my machines it still takes 12+ hours. On my back-up machine (AMD 2500+ , memory 1 GB : 2003), 2.4.1 took 5 hr . My everyday box (Core 2 Duo 2650 , memory 2 GB (faster FSB) : 2007), OO 2.4.1 took 2 h 14 m , so 3.0.0 is a bit more time-consuming; the download is much more: 346 MB against c 200 MB (that doesn't include the wretched Xulrunner: 75 MB15 m to compile). I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed 3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using). -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote: I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed 3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using). I have 4.5G free in /var and I've already run out of disk space TWICE trying to build OOo-3.0.0. I had to create a temporary logical volume and mount it at /var/tmp/portage/ just to get the thing to build. This is getting insane. Sun needs to have a good long hard look at this build process - 5G+ to build a package that totals 380M when installed is just a tad over the top in my book -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
Alan McKinnon schrieb: This is getting insane. Sun needs to have a good long hard look at this build process - 5G+ to build a package that totals 380M when installed is just a tad over the top in my book Someone once told me there is a library he needs for math and physics a the university. The library is only like 500kb but it takes more than 4gb to build it. This is insane. kh
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: progress everywhere !
081019 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Sunday 19 October 2008 18:48:37 Philip Webb wrote: I suspect there wb pleas for help from users who run out of disk space: earlier versions needed 3 GB , so this is a big jump, esp as I have 2 GB memory (I didn't check how much it was using). I have 4.5G free in /var and I've already run out of disk space TWICE trying to build OOo-3.0.0. I had to create a temporary logical volume and mount it at /var/tmp/portage/ just to get the thing to build. I have a 20 GB virtual hangar which I mount as /z , where I create ISOs also use for Portage builds as /z/tmp (this is set somewhere in make.conf ; I do use LVM). Ordinarily (eg now), c 2,7 GB are used, so there's plenty for OO. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
