Florian Gamböck floga.de> writes:
> Actually there was a quite longish news item about that. "New portage
> plug-in sync system" from 2015-02-02. There was also a link to the said
> Wiki page.
Yes I did and it did not work as noted. However, I did not have a default
mask set correctly on perm
Am 25.06.2015 um 17:55 schrieb James:
Ah. You are my new hero, dude!
I'm glad I could help. :-)
All that googling and news items; I guess I missed this doc...
Actually there was a quite longish news item about that. "New portage
plug-in sync system" from 2015-02-02. There was also a link t
Florian Gamböck floga.de> writes:
> You should take a look at
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Portage/Sync#layman-updater_Method.
AWESOME!
> TLDR: Install (as in "accept keyword") a newer version of Layman (at
> least 2.2.16), add the "sync-plugin-portage" USE-Flag, and maybe double
Jc García gmail.com> writes:
> I hope you find this useful.
Yes I did.
Sure sounds like an excellent topic for one of our devs to post
to planet.gentoo.org about an example of how diversified configurations for
our current migratory status on source codes from a wide variety of
places could
On 02/22/2015 03:26 AM, lee wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras writes:
>
>> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
>> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to
>> the rest of the world, please :-P
>
> Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the
Nikos Chantziaras writes:
> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to
> the rest of the world, please :-P
Why should "low" mean "high"? The rest of the world usually considers
"high" as high and "l
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On a side note, someone should inform the portage devs that higher
> priorities should equal lower numbers. Don't do it the opposite way to the
> rest of the world, please :-P
That "someone" could be you. Send mail to
gentoo-portage-...@
On 13/02/15 20:52, James wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
"repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me [...]
Does this system effect "epatch user", as in where the patches
are pl
On 13/02/15 22:16, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:29:07 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system. I now have a
file /etc/portage/repos.conf/local.conf:
[Local]
location = /usr/local/portage
auto-sync = no
And removed
Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
> I migrated my portage config to the new repos.conf system.
"repos.conf system" is very cool; thanks for posting about it;
but it's brand new to me, so I cannot really give you advise. I
did find this, in case you had not seen it yet:
http://wiki.gentoo.or
10 matches
Mail list logo
