Re: [gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

Torsten Veller wrote: * kashani kashani-l...@badapple.net: 3. Doctored up portage.mask to mask the errant virtuals =virtual/perl-Digest-SHA-5.47 =virtual/perl-Test-Harness-3.17 Thought grumpy thoughts at developers who let packages into ~x86 with completely broken deps. Hard mask that crap

[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

* kashani kashani-l...@badapple.net: When building bugzilla-3.4.1-r1 which requires ~x86 I have to unmask a number of perl modules. Two of those modules, listed above, attempt to pull in perl-5.10.1 which isn't in portage. Hardmasking packages that require dependencies that don't exist

[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

* Michael Higgins li...@evolone.org: Please report the error on b.g.o., so the perl herd (or whoever is really doing the work now) can fix the problem. Also, #gentoo-perl is the only place to get any real help on these gentoo-perl issues... (devolution to IRC chat being yet another systemic

[gentoo-user] Re: trying to track down broken dependency

* kashani kashani-l...@badapple.net: 3. Doctored up portage.mask to mask the errant virtuals =virtual/perl-Digest-SHA-5.47 =virtual/perl-Test-Harness-3.17 Thought grumpy thoughts at developers who let packages into ~x86 with completely broken deps. Hard mask that crap next time. There are