Bruce Hill wrote:
Too late, too tired, but do you have:
=sys-fs/udev-181
in /etc/portage/package.mask ?
Ehm... according to http://packages.gentoo.org/category/sys-fs?full_cat
udev-171-r9 is the only stable x86 version, and udev-181 doesn't exist
at all?!
-Matt (still using 171 because at
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:19:09AM -0600, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
Dustin C. Hatch admiralnemo at gmail.com writes:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
=sys-fs/udev-181
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:23 AM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
snip
Does this look normal?
James
Does anything when you are running unstable (~amd64) and then trying
to push it toward stable? That's always been difficult and dare I say
unsupported.
OK, I only run stable so I have
On 1/4/2013 10:23, James wrote:
Dustin C. Hatch admiralnemo at gmail.com writes:
The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not
virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both
the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e.
`rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot
afterward is probably a good idea as well.
I'm interested in what may crash, do you mean
On 1/4/2013 14:31, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600
Dustin C. Hatch admiraln...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e.
`rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot
afterward is probably a good idea as well.
I'm
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long night, when you have to answer your own posts.
Now I get:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 02:54:31AM +, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long
On 1/3/2013 20:54, James wrote:
James wireless at tampabay.rr.com writes:
So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to
udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196...
(ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.)
Long night, when you have to answer your
10 matches
Mail list logo
