Hi michael,
on Friday, 2006-09-08 at 08:44:05, you wrote:
I hope my experience is better than yours. I'm in the middle of this process
on a live system, been building since Monday (it's an old 600MHz box)
I just upgraded one Pentium-M laptop; went fine save for a few hitches
like Richard
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Am Freitag, 8. September 2006 05:07 schrieb ext Grant:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
It's not a question of improvement, but of consistency, especially for C++
sw like KDE. The GCC upgrade guide doesn't tell you to do so just for the
sake
2006/9/8, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
If you want
Boris Fersing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
If you want to prevent compilation issues, applications
On 9/7/06, Erik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant wrote:
Does gcc-4.1 offer enough of an improvement to warrant remerging the
whole system?
No, just remerge the packages that need to be remerged. Then emerge the
rest with gcc-4.1 when updates come.
Why do you advise people to ignore the
And if you want to prevent compilation issues, applications crash,
you'd better not follow the Gentoo GCC Upgrade Guide [1]
and do not upgrade gcc at all... :-(
Sorry for this sarcasm, but I am fighting with gcc-upgrade
for more than week. If I knew there would be so many issues,
I'd have
Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
[Timothy A. Holmes]
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far
I would call this discussion Re-installing the system with gcc-4.1
That's what I'm doing now after more than one week of struggle ! ;-)
On 9/8/06, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy A. Holmes wrote: [Timothy A. Holmes] I am leaving my office in a moment to put the
2006.1 disk in a server to
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far and it took me 5 days and nearly cost me
my laptop --
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a server to
start a fresh build (it's a standby server and I can afford to have it
off line for a day or 2) specifically to avoid having to do the gcc4
upgrade. Ive done one so far and it
For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
After unmerging the package,
/etc/env.d/05compiler
file was not deleted. As a result, enviroment variables were invalid.
After deleting the file (and 'env-update' and 'source /etc/profile')
switching to 4.1.1 was seamless
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
For me the main problem was an error in 'eselect-compiler' ebuild file.
eselect-compiler is now hard-masked, so that shouldn't be a problem any
more.
To add some balance, I've upgraded four machines, on three different
architectures, to
-Original Message-
From: Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:25 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
I am leaving my office in a moment to put the 2006.1 disk in a
server to
start
It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
this portage error.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 18:59, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 18:37:55 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
For me
Good one, Jean-Marc!
I hope my experience is better than yours. I'm in the middle of this process
on a live system, been building since Monday (it's an old 600MHz box)
If you can read this email, my system is still running
Michael
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Jean-Marc Beaune wrote:
I would call
, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 10:25 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
I am leaving my office in a moment
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to $DEITY, my mailer picked the tagline!
It is masked *now*, but it wasn't masked *before*, and unmerging was
not clean. I'm not the only who have lost plenty of time because of
this portage error.
Yes, I specified that it's
I'm agree absolutely, I have switched to 4.1.1 already :-) Probably, it is
not a bad idea to add a note about this trap somewhere in the official guide.
=== On Friday 08 September 2006 20:05, Neil Bothwick wrote: ===
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
Honest to
On Friday 08 September 2006 17:12, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
Most of my problems came in the stage of the revdep-rebuild things
simply wouldn't build. I finally solved it by un-installing as many of
the offending packages as I could, multiple emerge --sync and about 10
attempts at
Teacher
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14
-Original Message-
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:02 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
indicated -
That
-Original Message-
From: Bo Ørsted Andresen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:36 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
On Friday 08 September 2006 19:09, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide
On Friday 08 September 2006 20:07, Timothy A. Holmes wrote:
The guide that I followed is:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml
Under section 3 Upgrading from GCC-3.3 to 3.4 or greater
[SNIP]
This particular rebuild was going from 3.3 to 4.0 so revdep-rebuild was
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've followed the GCC upgrade guide before without problems, but now
I'm scared. Is all the trouble because of how Gentoo works or how GCC
works? What is the trouble like? Packages that won't compile, or
different things breaking in the system?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Richard Fish
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:50 PM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Remerge the system with gcc-4.1?
On 9/8/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
On 9/8/06, Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a system that I apparently built using the wrong stage 3
Make.conf has chost as i386 but it's a Pentium 4 box
Im just about to start the emerge eav system
Should I wait and /or fix something b4 I proceed?
You'll need to resolve
Michael Crute wrote:
Methinks there is just a bit of FUD swirling around. I can't speak to
GCC 4.1 (may do it this afternoon) but the last time I did a GCC
upgrade (following the documentation) I had absolutely no problems
whatsoever. If you are really worried tar up your system as a backup
28 matches
Mail list logo
