On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:06:01 +0930
Iain Buchanan wrote:

> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 21:16 -0400, David Relson wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:23:51 +0930
> > Iain Buchanan wrote:
> > 
> > > David - at this point I'd try a couple of things.  Since you've
> > > upgraded your linux-headers, it's a good idea to recompile your
> > > system libc, as per the elog message.
> > > 
> > > Also, since you're getting version error messages, recompile your
> > > kernel and reboot into it.  Just to make sure, as you've just done
> > > headers and libc (may be a long shot, but may as well rule it
> > > out).
> > > 
> > > Then unload all vm* modules and recompile them also.  (Say no to
> > > all vmware-config questions first, then second time around say
> > > yes!).  If it doesn't work, downgrade to a previous version of
> > > modules and try them. I use vmware-modules-1.0.0.11-r1 because
> > > that's the only version that works with workstation 4, which I
> > > have a license for.
> > > 
> > > Finally, if this all still fails, try with an earlier kernel and
> > > see if it magically works.  Then you know it's probably a new
> > > kernal feature thats bugging you!
> > > 
> > > I hope you have a few spare clock cycles for all this compiling :)
> > 
> > Hi Iain,
> > 
> > I've been using 'uname -r' and its reporting '2.6.25-gentoo-r4'
> > matches the module path,
> > i.e. /lib/modules/2.6.25-gentoo-r4/misc/vmnet.ko, in the "invalid
> > module" message.  I'm as certain as can be that there's no mismatch
> > here.
> 
> don't be so sure!  Do you know that you won't get the same message if,
> for example, you used different compilers for the kernel and the
> module? In my experience, this message can appear when the actual
> kernel number is ok, but it's been compiled differently...
> 
> > Also, I've removed all vm* packages and reinstalled vmware-server
> > (and whatever it pulls in, i.e. vmware-modules).  This was done
> > after removing all vmware entries from /etc/portage/package*, so
> > the vm* packages are all stable versions -- no ~amd64 versions.
> > 
> > Haven't tried rebuilding glibc ...
> > 
> > Instead I've installed the latest stable amd64 versions of 2.6.24
> > sources and headers.  The kernel is now being built.  I should know
> > before too long whether this helps.
> 
> good! Let's see what happens...

I've reverted to 2.6.24, emerged vmware-modules, run vmware-config.pl
and am pleased to report that the vmware-modules are loading without
complaint and that vmware-server is running.

I did _not_ disable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS or rebuild glibc.

Regards,

David
-- 
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to